Ridge Creek: Program Effectiveness

[RobertBruce]

So again you arent even willing to acknowledge that it may just may suggest a hint of impropiety that Sen. Jackson gives HLA a commendation, and then one short year later here not just Buchi, but several members of his family and his attorney all decide to donate to her campaign.

And you dont find it odd that they were all first time donators? Never before taking an interest in her career, yet when she gives Buchi a commendation he's happy to help?

You cant even acknowledge the possibility that there might have been some backroom dealings?

[SHH Anon Classics]

Earlier someone said that the campaign contributions must have occured in 2004 and therefore the explanation that the commendation was bought. I posted the list proving that wasn't the case, and you still bitch and moan about impropriety because now they are first time contributors? No matter what anybody posts, some of you just won't see the truth. You want to see only what you want to believe and nothing else. I am sure there is a name for that, but nuts is the only thing that comes to mind right now.

[SHH Anon Classics]

The lights are on, but there's nobody home

 :silly:

[Anonymous]

robert dear, they have hold of the steering wheel again and are steering toward the ditch.
the length of time between the commendation and the contribution is a useless sidetracking debate. she wasn't running for SoS at that time. she didn't announce her bid until 18 Mar 05. Contributions began 30 Mar.
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/custom ... 005/03/17/

[RobertBruce]

On 2005-12-19 19:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Earlier someone said that the campaign contributions must have occured in 2004 and therefore the explanation that the commendation was bought. I posted the list proving that wasn't the case, and you still bitch and moan about impropriety because now they are first time contributors? No matter what anybody posts, some of you just won't see the truth. You want to see only what you want to believe and nothing else. I am sure there is a name for that, but nuts is the only thing that comes to mind right now. "

Okay all you had to say was "I am way to blinded by the brainwashing Ive been subjected to, and much to much a party loyalist to ever consider the possibility."

All you did by providing that list was open up to the suggestion that she may have given them the commendation as a way of gaining their support. Nothing more. You didnt prove anything, anymore than we have. The difference is you arent even to the possibility that something shady went on. Not that it in fact did but simply the possibility based on appearances. But you cant, youre incapable of doing so.

The reason of course being youre a puppet and your Papa Buch wouldnt like you thinking such thoughts, so you dont.

[RobertBruce]

On 2005-12-19 19:42:00, Anonymous wrote:

"

robert dear, they have hold of the steering wheel again and are steering toward the ditch.

the length of time between the commendation and the contribution is a useless sidetracking debate. she wasn't running for SoS at that time. she didn't announce her bid until 18 Mar 05. Contributions began 30 Mar.

http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/custom ... 005/03/17/







"

The length of time doesnt seem to matter. Im interested to see if they are willing to even acknowledge the possibility of a backroom deal. How tight are the puppet strings?

[Anonymous]

dude, you're hallucinating. no one said those were 2004 contributions. pay attention so you don't waste people's time and ginger's bandwidth with unnecessary blather.

[RobertBruce]

You said so yourself they were all first time contributers.

She had been a State Senator since what 98?

It doesnt suggest anything to you at all that they never offer any support to her UNTIL she gives them a commendation?

I guess I was right, no independent thought from you.

how sad for you.

[Anonymous]

***The length of time doesnt seem to matter. Im interested to see if they are willing to even acknowledge the possibility of a backroom deal. How tight are the puppet strings?

you are kidding aren't you? you and i and everyone else knows that they would never admit that. waste of time. this ain't no courtroom and they aren't under oath- not that that would matter. and even if they were, contributions aren't illegal. it's the damned irony of how it went down. rational people will draw their own conclusions.

[RobertBruce]

Oh I know they wont admit it.

I just wanted to highlight that. Make sure everyone knows what cowards they all are from Buchi on down. Unwilling to acknowledge the truth on any subject no matter how obvious.

So now it appears HLA is working to place a politician in its pocket. Hmmm I wonder to what end? Not that it appears Mrs. Jackson is going to win, but if she did and HLA tried to use that friendship towards its own crooked ends, I wonder if anyone else would find the story interesting.

[SHH Anon Classics]

It is Mr. Bruce who can't acknowledge the truth even when it is put right in front of him because it is against his agenda and what he wants others to believe.

[WestSideStud2430]

On 2005-12-20 04:37:00, Anonymous wrote:

"It is Mr. Bruce who can't acknowledge the truth even when it is put right in front of him because it is against his agenda and what he wants others to believe."

Who are you?!? Oh wait...anonymous...

[Troll Control]

On 2005-12-20 04:37:00, Anonymous wrote:

"It is Mr. Bruce who can't acknowledge the truth even when it is put right in front of him because it is against his agenda and what he wants others to believe."

Please respond to this truth:

"Last year, research by the National Institutes of Health found that while coercive, fear-inducing treatment programs have not proven effective and could aggravate delinquent behavior, more holistic, family-centered approaches have demonstrated positive results in at-risk youth. One federal legislative proposal, the Keeping Families Together Act, would lift restrictions on a special Medicaid waiver to help families use public funds to access community-based treatment."

Please explain how your RTC is helping when all the studies ever done show that RTC's don't work and "aggravate" the kids' problems.

[RobertBruce]

On 2005-12-20 04:37:00, Anonymous wrote:

"It is Mr. Bruce who can't acknowledge the truth even when it is put right in front of him because it is against his agenda and what he wants others to believe."

Is that a fact? What truth is it I wont acknowledge? Cite it specifically.

Meanwhile evade further on the question of if there is even a remote possibility I am right abotu the relationship between former Sen. Jackson and Buch.

[SHH Anon Classics]

The answer to your question is there is no impropriety going on with that relationship. If you have a problem with it, take it up with the State if you feel so strongly about it. Otherwise, it's just another paranoid delusion of yours.