On 2005-12-15 18:51:00, aftenthurston wrote:
"SAT?? what is the purpose of that statement?
and how do you assume that your arguements are rational, whereas mine aren't? who, mr.bruce, do you think you are to determine what is rational and what is not?"
Perhaps you could ask one of your friends who is jealous of your idealism to explain to you the SAT remark.
My arguments are rational because they have a clear thought out process, a foundation and facts on which I can support them.
You on the other hand make shit up, assume things with no real basis, and then get upset when asked to back up your claim.
As far as who determines what....well we could argue the standards of society and whatnot...or divine law even, but really what does that have to do with the point made.
That being that you made a series of irrational pointless arguements that you cant back up.
Unless of course youd like to suprise me.