Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Liscensure Questions
abc123:
--- Quote ---I hope you will entertain more questions.
One that's been discussed at great length is the license issue. Is HLA a traditional boarding school or a theraputic one?
Also why are students kept from communicating unrestricted with their parents? I can understand limiting who they speak with, but not what they say. I myself was often made to rewrite letters if they contained passages such as "this place sucks" or simply "I dont like it here".
As much as I understand your preference for not revealing your name or position. Would you be willing to choose a user name? It would make things easier with communicating.
Again I thank you for your respectful nature and hope that we can continue the civil nature of the conversation. "
--- End quote ---
Okay, Robert, I have given myself a user name. I am going to try to answer these two questions to the best of my ability, though I am not sure the answers will be suficient to you. I will take the easy one first.
Why are students limited on what they can say? I don't question what you were told when you were at HLA. That is not my place. I can only tell you what students are told now. Ironically, students are specifically told now that they CAN say that they don't like it here. What they are told they cannot do is be disrespectful or lie. For example, a student CAN say, "I am so pissed off at my counselor. He put me on restriction and I don't think he even cares about me." A student CANNOT say, "My fucking counselor is an asshole. He put on restrictions for bullshit and told me to piss off because he doesn't care what happens to me." Now, if a counselor actually said that to a student (which would be highly unlikely), the student has every right to go to an administrator and let them know what was going on and the administration would take care of it.
I hope this anwers your question on this.
The second question is a bit trickier. I have seen the debates rage on about this. Again, I will not get into a circular argument over this. I will let you know my perception from when I was there and let others take it however they wish.
The answer is that HLA is both traditional and therapeutic. Obviously, HLA is therapeutic. Noone could ever realistically claim that it is not. When HLA first sought out accreditation from the Souther Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) it sought to be accredited as a special needs school. When the SACS committee came visit HLA, THEY suggested that HLA change its application to that of a traditional school. They suggested this based on their observations. This is not something that HLA sought out. When this was suggested, HLA would have been crazy not to follow up on it. Being accredited as a traditional school would be a huge benefit to its students. It would mean that any credits they obtained would be able to transfer to any boarding school or college in the country without question. As you can imagine, this would be huge for the HLA students and would be a wonderful selling point for the school. I have never understood why people are upset with the school for taking this position. Perhaps it will help to know that it was at the suggestion of the SACS committee and not HLA seeking this out for themselves.
In terms of people considering HLA to be a RTC, I suppose I can see why people are upset because based on definitions given on this board it would seem to fall into that category (on paper). However, similar to the situation with SACS, when anyone who investigates HLA in terms of being an RTC comes to campus, they clearly see the difference between the two. There is no realistic comparison. If the state really wanted to regulate HLA, the more prudent thing to do would be to create a category between traditional school and RTC, because that is what HLA truly is. People who argue that point on this board are wasting their time. The reallity is that HLA is unique and the state is probably not going to spend the time and money developing a whole new set of criteria for a single school.
I hope this is of some benefit. These are the facts to the best of my knowledge based on my experiences while at HLA. I am sure that there will those who take what I have said that tear it up. That is fine. I am not going to get into a debate. They seem to only end up in name calling anyway, and I will not go there.
Take care.
209
RobertBruce:
Thank you again for your courtesy, and for selecting a user name.
May I ask you before I get into your responses how long ago you left HLA?
As to your comments again I appreciate you being the only HLA staffer who is willing to answer questions.
For the first one however I will have to disagree with you. While I was at HLA we were told similar to what you stated that we in our communications with our parents could not lie or be abusive. Apparently there is a great deal of grey area within that criteria. For example the statement, "This is a bad place for me" was deemed a lie, and the statement "I have every right to be angry at you for putting me here" is deemed abusive. I believe the students there are set up to fail when it comes to communicating with their parents. Not only are they limited in what they can say but the parents are told to expect their child to lie about the situation. So if in the event the child is able to communicate how they really feel about HLA or what their experience really is the parents has already decided not to believe them on the advice of the childs counselor.
Although I can understand that a student may make up some outragous claim simply as a way of getting out of HLA, occasionaly they tell the truth as well. Every story has two sides but parents arent able to hear either one. I feel that perhaps a solution would be if the child is flat out lying and says that says...."Dear Mom this week I was gang raped and my counselor claimed it was theraputic." Now hopefully this is a lie, such a thing should not be allowed to be mailed out. However say a child says..."Dear Mom, in reals this week my counselors ganged up on me and bullied me the entire three hours trying to get me to cop guilt to something I didnt do." Now normally such a letter would not go out. Why not let it go out but with the counselors version of things along with it? That way the parent can get both versions and decide for themselves?
I just still feel if HLA has nothing to hide they would allow the child to communicate with the parents without fear of reprisal.
Now onto the next question. There has been a great deal of discussion regarding the accredidation mostly from the pro HLA people. We on the opposite side have never really questioned the issue. Our concern lies with how HLA represents itself on the state level. The evidence to date shows that HLA claims to be a traditional boarding school to ORS, yet advertises as a theraputic school to the rest of the world. I can accept that HLA is not truly either a theraputic or traditional, however why not be forthright about it with the state and at least follow the regs for a theraputic boarding school since it certianlly contains those elements?
Okay let me know about those, also I'd like to if you are still willing to discuss the rationing of food and the use of forced labor as a punishment.
abc123:
I will get to the other questions later...
But in regards to rationing of food and forced labor, I will respond.
Food Rationing- At one time there was such a thing as "restrictions meals". This consisted of cheese sandwiches and soup, with water to drink. This was discontinued some time ago, though I am not sure when. Now at HLA restrictions eat the same dinner as the rest of the students body with the exception of dessert. They eat in the lodge, prior to the time the rest of the student body eats. At lunch time there is absolutely no difference in those students on restrictions and those off of restrictions.
Forced Labor- Yes. Students do hard work while on restrictions. This is a double edged sword at times. I hear people complain that HLA is using kids to imporve their campus. I also hear complaints from students who have done mind numbing work such as moving a pile of rocks from one place to another and then back again. The later should never happen at HLA, though I will not make the argument that it has never happened. What restrictions routinely do at HLA is work that is meant to be productive. This may be clearing the woods of fallen limbs, or cutting up fallen trees with a chainsaw and then turning it into fire wood. It may be spreading mulch to help the landscape look better. The point is, their work is supposed to be something that the kids can look back on and take pride in. It is definitely not a money saving issue. HLA also employees a professional landscaping service that is on campus all the time. HLA really wants the kids to take pride in their work.
209
abc123:
"For the first one however I will have to disagree with you. While I was at HLA we were told similar to what you stated that we in our communications with our parents could not lie or be abusive. Apparently there is a great deal of grey area within that criteria. For example the statement, "This is a bad place for me" was deemed a lie, and the statement "I have every right to be angry at you for putting me here" is deemed abusive. I believe the students there are set up to fail when it comes to communicating with their parents. Not only are they limited in what they can say but the parents are told to expect their child to lie about the situation. So if in the event the child is able to communicate how they really feel about HLA or what their experience really is the parents has already decided not to believe them on the advice of the childs counselor. "
You are right is saying that it is a grey area. My personal preference as a counselor, and many other counselors, was to do exactly as you stated. Let both sides be heard and trust that the parents can dicipher truth from fiction. Their comes a point, however, when all you are doing is arguing and defending and you have to say enough is enough and insist that everyone move on. Otherwise, the child (and often the parents) will stay in an arguement indefinitely not realizing that this is where they are comfortable. The reality is for them, that as long a they can keep arguing about the petty stuff, they don't have to face the real issues. It is the therapist job to help everyone cut through the BS and focus on the real issues at hand. Sometimes this means controling the conversation.
Please understand, I sympathize with your frustrating over this and I don't pretend to know what your personal experience was. Perhaps, you should have been allowed to express more of what you needed to say. Maybe not. I wasn't there. At least, I don't think I was there. :wink:
209
RobertBruce:
I appreciate your honesty on both issues.
As to the physical labor part, I dont have an issue with students being made to do landscaping or assorted work, I agree with you that it does instill a sense of pride. However when used in the punitive sense I feel it does almost no good, and since according to state regs for theraputic boarding schools, it is in fact illegal.
Ill hold off on any further discussion of that though until you get a chance to address that point.
I may have missed it but are you willing to state when you were at HLA?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version