Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Suzanne Gray - Mindless Troll and HLA Groupie
RobertBruce:
--- Quote ---On 2005-11-20 16:09:00, Anonymous wrote:
"There are two things you should consider Robert.
Hidden Lake Academy is not subject to HIPPA laws. They are not a medical facility.
Employees during the time she was there did not sign or agree to any sort of privacy agreement.
Unless you have some sort of hard evidence that she got that information from a file you cannot prove she obtained it illegally. What evidence do you have that she got that name from a file?
"
--- End quote ---
If they arent a medical facility then why do they accept medical insurance as payment?
Why also do they tell the ORS of GA they are a traditional boarding school, yet tell the parents/educational consultants they are a theraputic boarding school?
Also why do they stress confidentiality in reals among the students and claim doctor patient privledge with the counsolers?
"Employees during the time she was there did not sign or agree to any sort of privacy agreement. "
This makes absolute zero sense. No employee in a theraputic setting would be permited to discuss any information concerning any patient in any public forum whatsoever. This is not a new rule by any means, it has been part of standards and practices for the theraputic community for decades. Confidentiality is so closely guarded a doctor cannot reveal the details or even if a patient attended sessions unless ordered so by a court order, nor can they reveal information shared in closed doors unless the information concerns the patient has a desire to committ a felony or is planning on killing themselves.
Mrs. Gray broke this rule. There is no way around it.
"Unless you have some sort of hard evidence that she got that information from a file you cannot prove she obtained it illegally. What evidence do you have that she got that name from a file?"
The information did not need to nessecarily come from a file. Information she gained while employed there would also be a breach of confidentiality. However as it stands Mrs. Gray did either get the information from a file or another employee. She never knew the student in question. Apparently never even met him. Since that is the case where else could she have gotten the information?
RobertBruce:
--- Quote ---On 2005-11-20 16:11:00, Anonymous wrote:
"What consequences? Civil? criminal? what kind of law did she break? If she indeed broke one? Misdemeanor? Felony? "
--- End quote ---
Both civil and criminal actually. She broke confidentiality statuets. Thus she is subject to those penalties, as well the student Devin can sue her in civil court for revealing on a public forum that he attended there. I dont know whether this is a felony or a misdomeaner, I would imagien a misdomeaner. Perhaps Dan can answer that question better.
RobertBruce:
--- Quote ---On 2005-11-20 16:20:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Tim, Scott, Dan, Sarah, Allison. I'm sure I could spout off more names at random. Would I be subject to one law suit or several? Good luck in court as no last names were mentioned, nor a timeframe in which the student were there. Or another consideration might be that I read a book on baby names and decided to throw a few out there. Regardless, this is a stupid arguement because HLA does not fall under HIPPA. As for my relationship with Mrs. Gray, there isn't one. Boredom and my inquisitive nature at one point made me curious about your identity. However, the boredom quickly passed. "
--- End quote ---
I guess its a good thing for me then that Bullfrog did mention when Devin attended school there and for how long. :grin:
Answer my question about the insurance and why HLA claims they are two seperate things.
Also tell me boredom would cause you to pursue something you dont care about? Also explain to me again how you just happened to pop up right when she made mention of the situation, and how she knew about it if there is no relationship. Also if the boredom passed why are you back here?
SHH Anon Classics:
Robert you dont know whether or not I met this kid. I do. Whether or not the kid remembers me is besides the point. And I published no information that would allow anybody to figure out which kid in the united states named Devon went to HLA. Because I dont know any personal info of his. I personally happen to know several Devons, my son being one of them. And you also dont know if in fact the name came from a file. I already told you I didnt have access to those files I didnt physically put the report cards in them. Damn you are dense as hell. You have no proof I have done anything illegal or immoral because in fact, I have not. I remembered a kids name. Thats it. Let's say for example, I also remembered a kid named Brian. And a kid named Blaire. And a kid named Tiffany. And a kid named Tyler. So now what? They all sue me? How in the hell would anybody put anything personal with those first names? There must be thousands of kids with those names in the united states. Once again Robert, you are wrong. There is no case, civil, criminal, or otherwise. There are no consequences. And if you are as smart as you claim, you will see that my IP addresses (I actually have 3) are not in the state of Georgia so I am in no way employed by HLA. I haven't lived in Georgia in over 3 years. I remembered a name. So what. I am beginning to wonder if you don't have OCD, you seem absolutely fixated on this subject for no logical reason, unless, of course, you are in fact Devon. Hmmmmm makes one wonder doesn't it.
SHH Anon Classics:
This is in answer to your last post Robert. First of all, did I mention which months and years the kid went there? NO. I did say a number of months but that was a guess because I remembered that the kid wasn't there that long. So, this means what? Nothing, once again.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version