On 2005-10-09 19:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Lying Liars
Posted: 2005-10-09 15:00:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Know what? It doesn't matter whether this particular incident occured or not. You, HydeFan, have stated pretty clearly that, even if it did happen, you're fine w/ protecting the rapist from prosecution.
Dear Non-Hyde Associated Person:
I notice that you never quoted me, but have said I stated "clearly" I am fine with protecting rapists from prosecution.
I triple-dog dare ya to fine anything even close to that.
Which you won't, because it doesn't exist.
In my wildest nightmare, I would never contenance rape.
You all seem so inflammed by your passions you all just keep making assertions without the facts. I didn't "clearly" state I was fine protecting a rapist from prosecution. Or half the other statements attributed to me.
I also haven't sworn or *for the most part* called people names (I think I used Liar, McFly, and probably a few others).....and I have carefully documented what was said and how I responded. I have done research on disclosure issues, and NIH (regarding another claim of "irrefutable proof" programs like Hyde don't work).
I am sure my arrogance my trigger visceral reactions from everyone that make them recollect Hyde. (I have to say, I can't give Hyde that much credit for my arrogance.) But why lose all reason and resort to making stuff up to try and win?
That's what kills me, and discredits all of the good legitimate work you are doing. Anyone coming to this site that already believes Hyde is bad may nod their head in agreement with you (like a recent x-parent), but I would have to think more reasoned thinkers would see how many on this site have been, if nothing else, reasonably slippery and deceptive.
Maybe not. I'm sure many of you will tell me not, but whether its you letter to Congress or any other effort, you will be tainted by a lack of truth telling, and that hurts your legitimate efforts.
Oh well, just some late night musings.