Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Rape at Hyde
Troll Control:
--- Quote ---On 2005-10-03 16:05:00, HydeFan wrote:
"Ok, I am not sure I can make this any clearer, but let me try one last time. The last sentence of your post correctly cut and past the "Circumstances" requiring a report to be filed.
CIRCUMSTANCES
When, while acting in a professional capacity, they know or have reasonable cause to suspect that a child has been or is likely to be abused or neglected.
WHAT YOU DIDN'T (SEEM TO) DO WAS CLICK ON THE BOX THAT SAID INCLUDE "Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect" (now would be the time to do that).
NOW LOOK AT THE DEFINITION OF "ABUSE AND NEGLECT"....it says....
"Abuse or neglect means a threat to a child?s health or welfare by physical injury or impairment, by a person responsible for the child."
BY A PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILD. The abuse or neglect must be BY A PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILD. Not "BY" other students.
To make this perfectly clear, everytime you see the words "abuse and neglect" add the words BY SOMEONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILD.
Is that "reasonably clear" enough?
Anyway, FWIW, I believe falsely stating someone else has committed a crime is defamation. I also don't think it would be too hard to find out your name after getting your IP address from the webhost in discovery.
As always, I stand ready to be wrong....but you (or someone like you) made the accusation that Hyde had acted criminally by not reporting a serious crime. You still haven't shown they had any such duty, and you definitely haven't shown that if they did, they didn't make their report.
As such that makes you a liar and someone willing to defame someone else to bolster their own position. As such, I can see why you may have had trouble at Hyde.
All that, and I'm the one drinking the cool-aid? Maybe, but at least I haven't told any lies here.
Why not admit you were wrong, that you thought there was a disclosure obligation, but really don't know for sure, and moreso, that you really had no basis to know if it did exist whether or not Hyde complied?
Either way, this is stupidity wrapped in lunacy. Rapes happen. Hopefully not to you me or anyone we love or care about, but they are a sad fact of life. That one may have happened at Hyde means very little, and I seriously doubt you were in a position to have any real incite in the appropriateness of how it was handled."
--- End quote ---
ok, here we go with the "defamation" lawsuit threats again. STFU with that BS. nothings going to happen.
HydeFan:
Once again, you missed the point.
First, it wasn't a threat, and I challenge you to find any words of threat in my post. Here's a definition to help you: A threat is a declaration of an intention to inflict harm. Go ahead now. Tell me where my threat is.
What I did do was state an opinion of the value of your (or your anonymous brethrens) posts, and what could happen as a result.
I am not Hyde, and I too don't think anything is likely to happen.
I was merely pointing out that the only crime I have real evidence of is what looks to me like defamation.
Defamation, by definition of course, would make you not only a liar, but a really serious liar.
And (IMHO) that's all anyone here needs to really know about you.
It discredits everything you say on these posts and reveals am apparent robust lack of integrity.
No wonder you don't like Hyde. You never really got it!
[ This Message was edited by: HydeFan on 2005-10-04 09:03 ]
HydeFan:
[ This Message was edited by: HydeFan on 2005-10-04 09:01 ]
Troll Control:
--- Quote ---On 2005-10-04 08:55:00, HydeFan wrote:
"Once again, you missed the point.
First, it wasn't a threat, and I challenge you to find any words of threat in my post. Here's a definition to help you: A threat is a declaration of an intention to inflict harm. Go ahead now. Tell me where my threat is.
What I did do was state an opinion of the value of your (or your anonymous brethrens) posts, and what could happen as a result.
I am not Hyde, and I too don't think anything is likely to happen.
I was merely pointing out that the only crime I have real evidence of is what looks to me like defamation.
Defamation, by definition of course, would make you not only a liar, but a really serious liar.
And (IMHO) that's all anyone here needs to really know about you.
It discredits everything you say on these posts and reveals am apparent robust lack of integrity.
No wonder you don't like Hyde. You never really got it!
[ This Message was edited by: HydeFan on 2005-10-04 09:03 ]"
--- End quote ---
I never went to Hyde you presumptuous jackass. Nobody likes a know-it-all. I'm sure you already know that though. If you actually had a life or friends you wouldn't be constantly trolling here, now would you?
Anonymous:
Hmmmm. You didn't go to Hyde? Are you a Hyde parent? My comments would apply equally then.
Otherwise, why post here? And why constantly the subject into personal attacks?
There are still two challenges on the able:
1. Show that Hyde had a legal obligation to report this alledged rape, and
2. Show that if they had this duty, that they didn't.
Otherwise, let's start a new stream and have a more meaningful discussion.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version