I'm thinking more of trade organization, that are supposed to abide by ethical standards that, particularly, in many instances, would not be cost effective.
As I see it, NATSAP is like say Nike and...Gap (I know there was a lawsuit- but doubtful they have changed their sweatshop ways) stating they will attempt to treat their workers ethically, but w/o 'teeth' to enforce and a clear conflict of interest, as I understand it,given that its not cost effective to do so. Given their industry and this industry, any industry, are very hesistant to hurt their bottom line...unless it's seen as thrwating future problems, eg. bad for their image and could result in loss of business...
So, as I see it, this is very much like the finincial cost involved in hiring qualified workers in this particular industry-or, in this instance the cost of becoming a qualified 'headmaster' who determines the course of the school, its' psuedo-therapeutic philosophy, and runs groups.
...I think John Mercer is just now getting his Phd after 'treating' hundreds of girls because he forsaw his interests threatened, and NOT becuase of any desire to create a more ethical environment by actually providing kids with REAL therapy.
I think he also know that the way he has treated many of us was wrong and is back-peddling. He also is well respected by NATSAP, all of this indicates to me that NATSAP is a Joke! easily swayed by some cowboy boot & hat wearing, ego driven, smooth talking... con man.