Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Seed Discussion Forum

as*****

<< < (3/14) > >>

GregFL:
anon 1, thanks for your reply.

Anon 2, it is clear what you are and have been trying to do here, divide us into two camps. It won't work. Nice try. Why don't you go back and list every attack against Ginger or Stripe that I also didn't respond too?

Am I to react to every post?  Am I supposed to be some  babysitter of every word posted on this site? Sorry, taint gonna.

happen Unless someone is posting vile content or a thread is getting out of control, I stay out of it unless I feel my PERSONAL opinion is justified. I am a participant here and my opinion is neither more valid or less valid than yours.

In the example you site above with Fuelaw, a very serious claim of abuse was alleged. It wasn't Vile content. My post was to preempt a bunch of "your a druggie loser" type posts and to keep a very unprecidented thread ON TOPIC. Also note I never took a position on the veracity of his statement on whether John U abused him or not. In the context of his claims some anger is understandable. Before JU ever posted one word here I told him to expect some anger and he said he Knew it would come and he still chose to post. Unfortunately, JU never answered the abuse claim but instead choose to just insult all lawyers in general.

Now Anon, go do your homework and try to poke some more holes in our online community. It has been your mission for  the last month, afterall, to disrupt and belittle this forum and to anonymously attack Ginger, Marc  and Stripe, eh?  Don't forget I see all your postings whether you post them under your handle or post them "anon". Wanna list my responses to your anon attacks? They don't exist.

You wanna talk about partiality? Go look in the mirror.

Anonymous:
Correction, I believe the abuse claim was specifically addressed in John U's very 1st message board post.

Thom:

--- Quote ---On 2005-09-20 07:43:00, GregFL wrote:

"lets all try to make an effort to speak with our handles...I think that will help.



"

--- End quote ---


I just tried speaking with my handle, but I got no response. :cry:

marcwordsmith:
This is truly remarkable. I've never seen a forum where anonymous posters get to sound off so much and are taken so seriously.

And now even Greg is saying that I "may have been over the top"?

All right then I'll explain myself. Probably a bad idea, but we'll see what happens . . .

Dear Anonymous, and Greg, and anyone else who thinks my "asshole" post to JU was "over the top" . . .

I wrote what I wrote in response to the following comments by John Underwood:

"I should also mention, specifically for those of you with crystal balls in your heads or just enamored with your own musings, at age 15, not a single one, NONE, of the aforementioned, (including myself), had ever used an illegal drug. Some had used alcohol, myself included, but most, nothing!"

Do you get that this was snide and condescending language, from a man who has a FUCKING UNMITIGATED NERVE to sneer at ANYONE on this website? Do you get the assinine, ludicrous insinuation--that because he and his friends hadn't used drugs yet at 15, and they all became heroin addicts, that means that the rest of us who were imprisoned in the Seed at 14 or 15 (or whatever) would probably have become heroin addicts too?

Do you get that when he talks about the "REAL PEOPLE" (the all-caps being his own) he knew, he just might be implying that our own experiences of abuse were insubstantial and negligible in comparison, not as "REAL" as the sufferings of his dear departed friends? Do you get that he's pulling out a sacred cow here, and trying to slap us around a bit with his sanctimonious grief?

Do you get that all this heavy handedness was rather Seed-like?

And do you get that his subsequent raving maniacal all-caps abusive post was the real John, shrieking in impotent fury, because people weren't buying his latest act?

Greg, I am disappointed in you, my friend.

I will acknowledge (though it's always dangerous to concede ANYTHING when you're around Seedlings) that I've been a little schizophrenic in terms of regretting some of my harsh language, apologizing for it, then being harsh again. Here's why that has happened. I have a belief system that says it's never really okay to speak unkindly. But that belief system is sorely tested by the likes of unrepentant abuser assholes like John Underwood. And so no more apologies. I make you that promise.

And Anonymous, for God's sake, use your name already. What's up with that? What are you afraid of?

Anonymous:
marcwordsmith is your real name?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page