Author Topic: Former student  (Read 3968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2005, 09:46:00 AM »
intentions, purpose? To make money!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2005, 11:02:00 AM »
Any other former students out there who have a story to share?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2005, 09:44:00 AM »
Any news on the criminal trial?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2005, 03:30:00 PM »
What are the charges again?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2005, 04:07:00 PM »
Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with child abuse/hazing, 7 counts against 4 children.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2005, 07:16:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-09-29 13:07:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with child abuse/hazing, 7 counts against 4 children."


Thanks, can you explain what "hazing" means (in this case)?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #21 on: September 29, 2005, 09:43:00 PM »
You'd have to ask Cheryl Sudweeks
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2005, 08:14:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-09-29 16:16:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-09-29 13:07:00, Anonymous wrote:


"Cheryl Sudweeks was charged with child abuse/hazing, 7 counts against 4 children."




Thanks, can you explain what "hazing" means (in this case)?"
Utah Hazing Law
ยง 76-5-107.5.  Prohibition of "hazing" -- Definitions -- Penalties


   (1) A person is guilty of hazing if that person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly commits an act or causes another to commit an act that:

   (a) (i) endangers the mental or physical health or safety of another; or

      (ii) involves any brutality of a physical nature such as whipping, beating, branding, calisthenics, bruising, electric shocking, placing of a harmful substance on the body, or exposure to the elements; or

      (iii) involves consumption of any food, liquor, drug, or other substance or any other physical activity that endangers the mental or physical health and safety of an individual; or

      (iv) involves any activity that would subject the individual to extreme mental stress, such as sleep deprivation, extended isolation from social contact, or conduct that subjects another to extreme embarrassment, shame, or humiliation; or

      (v) involves cruelty to any animal as provided in Section 76-9-301; and

   (b) (i) is for the purpose of initiation, admission into, affiliation with, holding office in, or as a condition for continued membership in any organization; or

      (ii) if the actor knew that the victim is a member of or candidate for membership with a school team or school organization to which the actor belongs or did belong within the preceding two years.

(2) It is not a defense to prosecution of hazing that a person under 21, against whom the hazing was directed, consented to or acquiesced in the hazing activity.

(3) An actor who hazes another is guilty of a:

   (a) class C misdemeanor if the conduct violates Section 76-9-301;

   (b) class B misdemeanor if there are no aggravating circumstances;

   (c) class A misdemeanor if the act involves the operation or other use of a motor vehicle;

   (d) third degree felony if the act involves the use of a dangerous weapon as defined in Section 76-1-601;

   (e) third degree felony if the hazing results in serious bodily injury to a person; or

   (f) second degree felony if hazing under Subsection (3)(e) involves the use of a dangerous weapon as defined in Section 76-1-601.

(4) A person who in good faith reports or participates in reporting of an alleged hazing is not subject to any civil or criminal liability regarding the reporting.

(5) (a) This section does not apply to military training or other official military activities.

   (b) Military conduct is governed by Title 39, Chapter 6, Utah Code of Military Justice.

(6) (a) A prosecution under this section does not bar a prosecution of the actor for:

      (i) any other offense for which the actor may be liable as a party for conduct committed by the person hazed; or

      (ii) any offense, caused in the course of the hazing, that the actor commits against the person who is hazed.

   (b) Under Subsection (6)(a)(i) a person may be separately punished, both for the hazing offense and the conduct committed by the person hazed.

   (c) Under Subsection (6)(a)(ii) a person may not be punished both for hazing and for the other offense, but shall be punished for the offense carrying the greater maximum penalty.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2005, 11:00:00 PM »
Thank you DJ.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #24 on: October 05, 2005, 05:54:00 AM »
Wonder which of these Cheryl Sudweeks is charged with? sure doesn't sound too good. Think she will cop a plea?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #25 on: October 05, 2005, 11:59:00 AM »
Don't think the County Attorney will accept anything but a full-blown trial.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #26 on: October 05, 2005, 12:06:00 PM »
Point well taken. Why would the County Attorney accept a plea bargain? The investigation is still active, and the charges may continue to pile on!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #27 on: October 05, 2005, 05:28:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-10-05 09:06:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Point well taken. Why would the County Attorney accept a plea bargain? The investigation is still active, and the charges may continue to pile on!"


Skyline Journey was allowed to remain open nearly a year while appealing the revoction of their license after the horrible death of Ian August. They later lost their appeal and shut down only to reopen later under a different name (Distant Drums?).

Personally, I think programs that are under investigation should be temporarily closed down until there is a resolution.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2005, 11:29:00 PM »
Agree 100% that a program should be shut down while the owner is being tried for child abuse in criminal court. One would think that a "referral company" like PURE that claims to care about the welfare of children would not continue to send kids to Whitmore while the owners are being investigated for child abuse too. But guess Sue Scheff is more concerned about her "friendship" with the Sudweeks and $$$$ and the safety of children!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Former student
« Reply #29 on: October 06, 2005, 08:52:00 PM »
Understand the "enrollment" at Whitmore is down to about 14 kids now, and a November "graduation" is planned. Whoever heard of a graduation in November????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »