Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Brat Camp
SAY HELLO TO OUR STRUGGLING TEENS TROLL
Anonymous:
Assuming in fact that this is not the number for the "Karen" from ST, whoever posted it in that context has 1) posted someone else's information
and 2)indicated that this "someone else" is "Karen" from ST---just by the context in which it was posted. The result could be that an innocent person who had nothing to do with this whole board would receive harrassing, distressing calls.
It doesn't make any difference if the names are the same, the ANON poster who did the posting (and even allowed it to remain after being told it was incorrect)has acted to cause another innocent person distress by falsely putting her number into the hands of those who may harrass her or god forbid harm her
Just read the California Dellapenta decision---it will make more sense to you then maybe
Anonymous:
If you are getting that from an online telephone directory, first or all the person does not choose to list on those. as someone else said it isn't exactly an unusual name. I did n't find a name and address by just doing google
Anonymous:
Doesnt sound like this poster is indicating its Karen does it?
--- Quote ---Im guessing by your hotmail email address, your real name is something close to KAREN AUSTIN?
Only one yield when I searched YAHOO people for this. I wonder if this is actually KARENS phone numbers??
(***) ***-1517
--- End quote ---
Sure are lots of ??? question marks there.
Sorry your arguments keep falling apart though.
:wave:
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2005-08-03 12:52:00, Anonymous wrote:
"If you are getting that from an online telephone directory, first or all the person does not choose to list on those. as someone else said it isn't exactly an unusual name. I did n't find a name and address by just doing google"
--- End quote ---
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=ka ... gle+Search
Anonymous:
--- Quote --- Gary Dellapenta, 50, a Los Angeles security guard, pleaded guilty last April to charges that he attempted to use the Internet to solicit the rape of a female acquaintance.
Dellapenta admitted that he posed as his victim -- a woman who had spurned him -- in sex-themed Internet chat rooms by placing personal ads in the woman's name. A slew of men answered the lurid ads, and Dellapenta sent them e-mail messages in reply, claiming that the woman fantasized about being raped.
In the e-mails, he included the woman's name, physical description, address and telephone number. He concluded the messages with tips on how to bypass the woman's home security system.
Six men came to the 28-year-old woman's home saying they wanted to rape her. Dellapenta was ultimately sentenced to six years in a California state prison. The conviction was a victory for law enforcement, but one that required an enormous amount of manpower.
Collaborating in Dellapenta's arrest were the FBI, the Los Angeles District Attorney and Sheriff offices and even the victim's father, who learned of Dellapenta's identity by responding to the chat room messages himself.
Many cyberstalkers remain at large, however, because most municipalities don't have the necessary expertise and manpower.
--- End quote ---
You are comaring that, to this?
Please, tell me you are kidding.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version