Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore
cheryl's kids 4 life
Anonymous:
Sounds like somebody's getting all riled up about something in WHITMORE LAND. It is that time of year again. Didn't all this "trouble" break out in the good ole month of OCTOBER 2004? Anniversary time in WHITMORE LAND? What would this be, 3rd Anniversary? Celebration time, is it?
Anonymous:
Where's AMF? A poem seems in order.
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---"Plea in Abeyance" means Cheryl's "nolo contrendere" plea -- which is an agreement by the defendant that, in deed, the incidents charged happened -- would not be acted upon, unless Cheryl did not comform to the terms -- the terms being the same sentence she would have received if found guilty at trial.
"Nolo Contrendere" means "I do not wish to contend, fight or maintain a defense; it admits all facts stated in the indictment. The plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a plea of guilt for purposes of the criminal matter. It cannot be used as an admission of guilt in other matters."
By the way, unless you are a plaintiff in the civil case or Mark or Cheryl, you could not possibly know anything about it. And what you are stating, plain and simply, is untrue.
--- End quote ---
To the budding legal eagle who tried to teach us the law - another. . .failure.
"Nolo contendre" is Latin for "No Contest." The terms have NOTHING to do with the legal concept of a "plea in abeyance", which can be used in either guilty or "no contest" plea situations.
With respect to a "no contest" plea, the defendant does not "admit" the facts, rather the defendant simply agrees that he/she does not contest that the facts afford a reasonable basis for the court to accept the pleas. If not, the court could not legally accept the pleas.
And, nope - not Mark nor Cheryl, nor a plaintiff. But think what you want.
Anonymous:
Which Law book did you get your definition from, Leagal Eagle? Try again. Ylu translation of Latin to English is correct, what it mean as far as its implications in the law is not you've got it wrong -- Legal Eagle.
And you know nothing about the civil lawsuit. So, who are you trying to bullshit?
Anonymous:
Why did the Sudweeks close down Whitmore Academy?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version