Author Topic: Signs and Symptoms  (Read 10794 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #60 on: June 29, 2005, 10:12:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-29 19:06:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

On 2005-06-27 16:48:00, Anonymous wrote:


"What behaviors precipitated sending the children to Whitmore?   :???: "




For the 3rd time.........can someone with good sense please answer this question?  Everyone has spent 3 days talking about everything else but this question.  Why don't you just create a different topic that applies to all you have been talking about here.  What you have replied with does not apply to the original topic!  Pay ATTENTION!



And, to the ANON poster who insists on replying with BPD information, restrain your obsession with Sue Scheff and Cheryl Sudweeks or post to a different topic.  Thank you.



Sincerely,



Still Looking for Answers  :???: "


Apparently, the program accepts kids on probation but I doubt you will get anymore information than that considering privacy laws.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #61 on: June 29, 2005, 11:52:00 PM »
To "Still Looking for Answers":

I would venture to say that perhaps children may end up at Whitmore as a result of behavioral problems at school or home.  Parents may be inept or do not have time to deal with the problems and are looking for a quick fix.  Just a thought.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #62 on: June 30, 2005, 12:29:00 AM »
To "Still Looking for Answers" ...

Statistically, I think the evidence shows that many kids end up at places like Whitmore not because their parents are inept, but because they are vulnerable, and as such, make easy targets for hard-selling referral agencies who convince them to act now before it's too late.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #63 on: June 30, 2005, 12:30:00 AM »
About "these new kids that just arrived."
Were these parents TOLD that the OWNERS of this FINE ACADEMICS ONLY BOARDING SCHOOL were under investigation for child abuse and fraud?
And that Mr. Stettler is asking LOTS of questions about just whether or NOT Whitmore needs to be licensed and regulated by his Agency?  Were these parents given FULL DISCLOSURE by these OWNERS and by the REFERRAL company, which it can be "assumed" is PURE?

Are any NEW parents being given FULL DISCLOSURE that Cheryl Sudweeks has been CHARGED with 7 counts of child abuse and that absolutely NO THERAPY is available to any kids being placed there?
Anyone believe the Sudweeks and the Referring consultant are being completely honest with these "new parents and kids?"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #64 on: June 30, 2005, 12:36:00 AM »
To the ANON who "ventures to say" that the parents may have been looking for a quick fix. You have no idea why any parent enrolled their child at Whitmore, or anything about their parenting skills. You seem to know even less about the teen help industry.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #65 on: June 30, 2005, 12:52:00 AM »
The previous posting stated that Whitmore apparently accepted students who are on probation. That can not possibly be correct. The contract clearly states that no students with a criminal record can be accepted at the Whitmore Academy! It is right there in the contract!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #66 on: June 30, 2005, 01:19:00 AM »
Quote

On 2005-06-29 19:06:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote


On 2005-06-27 16:48:00, Anonymous wrote:


"What behaviors precipitated sending the children to Whitmore?   :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #67 on: June 30, 2005, 01:30:00 AM »
Who's angry?
Bye bye......S
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #68 on: June 30, 2005, 02:50:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-29 22:30:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Who's angry?

Bye bye......S"


Oh..Obsessed One...please find a topic where you belong.  Your constant focus on Sue Scheff and Cheryl Sudweeks is, to say the least, BORING.  

Yes, we all probably agree there is a problem or two, or 7, at Whitmore and other RTC's, however, it appears you use this forum more for therapy than for solutions.

Call 1-800-INEEDTHERAPY to help with your apparent issues.

Nite. :roll:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Signs and Symptoms
« Reply #69 on: July 04, 2005, 12:30:00 PM »
Did you verify any of your "pat answers" about what types of kids are enrolled at Whitmore when you chatted with the QUEEN OF MEAN  ::bangin:: ?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164661
  • Karma: +2/-1
    • View Profile
Scheff's interview on 20/20
« Reply #70 on: August 19, 2007, 01:33:16 AM »
[quote="Guest"]is anyone on here that continues to ramble about Sue's daughter, know that she is deceased? If any of you have any respect or decency, you would not talk about her daughter in such ways. [/quote]

Sue Scheff made reference to this post on her interview on ABC 20/20.

It appears that Sue Scheff tried to give the impression on 20/20 that there were ongoing Fornits posts that "her daughter had died" in some attempt to defame, or harrass her in some way.

Wonder who this GUEST poster might be?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »