« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Watching ISAC  (Read 1191 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« on: June 26, 2005, 09:17:00 PM »
Whoops, they got sued out of existence...sorry! (circa 2006)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2005, 09:44:00 PM »
Are you kidding me?  This lawsuit is only going to make ISAC more visible ... especially when they win in court.

Baaaawaaaahahahaaaa

Remember, WWASPS has been named in a direct action lawsuit. Seems to me they got bigger fish to fry than worry about little ole' ISAC.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2005, 09:47:00 PM »
WWASPS SUED
Posted: 2005-06-16 13:35:00  

Earlier this month, 26 plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in a California court against WWASPS and its associated facilities, including Spring Creek. According to the 92-page complaint filed by California attorneys Edward Masry (of Erin Brockovich fame) and Henry Bushkin, Spring Creek is accused of negligence, negligent child abuse, breach of contract, fraud, assault and battery, false imprisonment, intentional inflection of emotional distress, negligent medical care, breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy to commit breach of contract.

One of the plaintiffs, former Spring Creek student Gregory Gomez, alleges he was subjected to threats, intimidation, invasion of privacy, mental abuse and random punishment. The complaint states that Gomez?s mother was led to believe her son was benefiting from his experience at Spring Creek while he was being abused. Gomez also alleges he suffered bodily injury at the hands of Spring Creek staff members and was cut off from outside contact, thus unable to report the abuse.

Spring Creek officials would not comment on the case other than to say that they have not yet seen the lawsuit, which was filed May 27 in Los Angeles Superior Court.

http://www.everyweek.com/News/News.asp?no=4970
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2005, 09:57:00 PM »
Is this a poor attempt at deflection?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2005, 10:19:00 PM »
::alieneyesa::  ::bwahaha2::  ::soapbox::  ::unhappy::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::  ::fuckoff::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2005, 10:39:00 PM »
What's most interesting to me is the people who are so pleased to see ISAC being sued.
Now what does that tell us about them?
Why would these few, be so glad to see an effective advocacy group against institutional child abuse "sued out of existence"?
[Again:Dream on]
Could it be these few are not as concerned with the safety of kids in these programs, as they've for so long pretended?
Could it be that they are far, far more interested in how much money they can make?
They are just like the very ones who are suing ISAC, it seems to me.
Just exactly that same.
Why am I so surprised?
I (and everyone) know full well where you learned the trade.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2005, 11:32:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-26 18:57:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Is this a poor attempt at deflection?  "


No idiot .. it's to remind people that ISAC is not accused of abusing anybody.  They are the good guys.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2005, 11:34:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-06-26 19:39:00, BuzzKill wrote:

"What's most interesting to me is the people who are so pleased to see ISAC being sued.

Now what does that tell us about them?

Why would these few, be so glad to see an effective advocacy group against institutional child abuse "sued out of existence"?

[Again:Dream on]

Could it be these few are not as concerned with the safety of kids in these programs, as they've for so long pretended?

Could it be that they are far, far more interested in how much money they can make?

They are just like the very ones who are suing ISAC, it seems to me.

Just exactly that same.

Why am I so surprised?

I (and everyone) know full well where you learned the trade.











"


Well said BK.  These losers are a bunch of pure hypocrites, if ya ask me!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Watching ISAC
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2005, 02:13:00 AM »
Who stands to "win" if ISAC isn't around? WHO? Think everyone knows the answer to that. Think it just might be time to show some support, and make sure ISAC is here to stay!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »