Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Brat Camp

Redcliffer

<< < (6/37) > >>

Anonymous:
Thanks for the commentary. From the research I've done, it looks like a lot of these programs are having an identity crisis.  They don't know which category they fall into, and don't understand how the Interstate Compact applies to them.  In this case, it's a bit of a hint that their application packet includes the IC form.  If this is not complied with properly is it a Federal offense?

We are desperate.  My husband hasn't eaten in three days, and I could pack my clothes in the bags under his eyes.  Finally, a relative of the mother emailed us some photos of the child, taken last week at Redcliff.  He looked so skinny, sunken in, dirty, and hot.  I couldn't stand it.  I haven't stopped crying since. I don't know how his mother sleeps at night. I just can't comprehend how she could do something like this to her own child, when he just plain doesn't deserve it. She needs to trade places with him. They made him smile for the picture, I know his fake smile. His face didn't even look the same.   It broke my heart, and my husband was crushed.  

We hadn't given any thought to a lawsuit. At least, not against Redcliff. We felt they had just made some really bad choices in accepting the child, when there were red flags all over the application.  They were very slow to respond to questions or requests, and at some point, they quit responding at all. We've been immersed in trying to find a way to get him out, dealing with a crazy Family Court system (which was apparently a total waste of time, effort and money, since they NOW say it has to be a court order from UTAH).  We have so much documentation, we're running out of room to store it all.  Until recently, they seemed to be okay with sharing information. But they still chose to ignore the findings of the psychological evaluation which stated this was contraindicated. But now, things are changing.  And not for the better.  Now they are basically saying the fact that the parents have JOINT legal custody means NOTHING.  They are treating my husband like an intruder in his son's life.  Now they are telling us things that just don't even sound LEGAL, but refuse to confirm it in writing.  Usually if someone won't stand behind a statement in writing, they are afraid of something.  We have been allocated 15 minutes per week to get progress reports from his counselor, and that's been our lifeline.  I'm afraid they will take that away from us now.  That would be like a stake through my husband's heart.  

I did get one chuckle today.  The guy at Redcliff said he has a young son, and he's going to put his son through the "program" when he's older, just for the great experience of it all.  My fantasy would be to open my own wilderness therapy camp in NH, have an unrelated third party sign a consent form and pay to enroll HIS INNOCENT SON in it, have a couple of paid strangers abduct his son without his knowledge, and remove him from his home and bring him to ME.  I could show his child a really good, character-building wilderness experience.  I would let him eat plain oatmeal every morning, and if he was really good, I might give him a chance to earn some sugar or spices (no kidding, they actually DO this).  We'd hike all day in extreme temperatures, stop somewhere and dig a latrine, and sleep under a tarp. I'd hire a licensed social worker to visit the child once a week and talk to him.  I would give him a 15 minute report on his son's progress once a week, but he could not see his son or speak to him for 30 - 60+ days. He could send his son letters, but his son's letters back to him would be routed through his worst enemy to decide IF he should receive them.  He'd just have to take MY WORD for it that his son is safe and doing just fine.  I wonder how he would feel.  Would he be angry?  Would he be hurt, knowing he couldn't help his child?  I honestly don't know.  He's just a businessman.  Do businessmen cry?  Maybe they only cry when they lose money.

I'm sorry.  I'm just blowing off steam.  And I'm sleep-deprived.  We'll be spending the weekend hashing this out, and trying to figure out the next step.  This just can't go on much longer.  My husband is not going to survive this if we can't do something effective very soon.  

Thanks for the support!  WE NEED IT!!!!

Deborah:
***They are treating my husband like an intruder in his son's life.***

I can so relate to this. It's only words until you have lived it. It was the most surreal experience I've ever had. Phone rings on Monday morning and a total stranger informs me that my son has been enrolled in their program, would be there 18 months (extended to 22), and laid out the rules of communication for the next few months. Oh, and of course, hopes that I will be supportive, because that is what's in my son's best interest.
My head was swirling. I couldn't think.
When I could finally formulate a sentence I asked him if it was a psychiatric hospital. No. Who had dx'd my son ODD? THEY had, based on his father's complaints. How convenient!
Overnight I lost total contact with my son. His letters were choreographed and talked of his 'therapeutic' goals. It was someone else's words. Not my son's. And not positive or comforting. When the calls finally began they were monitored. He was able to tell me how confused he was, but most complaints were interrupted- manipulation. He couldn't figure out what they expected of him. He was in a highly distressed state.
Toward the end I rarely received my calls. I was forbidden from calling the facility. All calls had to go through their corp attorney. This because I reported them to state aurhorities for operating without a license.
When I finally saw him for the first time in 3 months he looked like a refugee. Thin, grey as a lizard, dirrhea for 3 days. Had been on restriction the better part of the prior month, subsisting on dry cereal, white bread and cheese sandwiches for lunch and dinner... provided he didn't loose a meal as punishment. We cried a lot during the visit. I promised him I'd do everything I could to get him out. My heart ached to see what they had done to him and I shuttered to think what he'd be like after 2 years. It was truly unbelievable. You can read more of the details in the HLA thread.
To this day I have never received a single document I requested from my son's file.
I'm so sorry that ya'll have to go through the same thing. Hopefully it will only be a couple of months and not years.
Keep us posted.
Oh! What was the rationale for needing a court order from Utah. Sorry if I missed the explanation. Does a Utah court have jurisdiction over the divorce decree?

[ This Message was edited by: Deborah on 2005-08-12 21:38 ]

Anonymous:
Deborah, I can't even imagine what you've gone through!  What a horrific experience!  For us, it's only been three weeks (so far) but we feel like our hearts have been ripped out.  I hope you didn't go through that alone.  We are so grateful we have each other to lean on.  We keep reassuring each other that Redcliff has a good safety record, and that his son is (or WAS) physically strong and healthy.  But we are scared to death what this is doing to him emotionally.  He knows he is there because he has a deeply troubled narcissistic mother.  I've written his Redcliff counselor, who fully understands his situation now, and asked her if it's possible to teach him coping skills, and skills to manage or mitigate his mother's rages, before he goes home.  If he can't learn how to calm her down, he'll go home one day, and the next day he'll wake up to "escorts" again.  Redcliff has the written report saying his relationship with his mother leaves him in an almost chronic expectation of attack.  He is a victim, Redcliff Ascent knows this, and they are contributing to his continued victimization in my opinion.  

The Utah thing.  It doesn't make sense.  The jurisdiction over custody remains in the control of New Hampshire.  Utah has no jurisdiction over this that I can see. They refuse to put this in writing.  The last thing we got in writing was the "new and improved" list of requirements to be allowed to remove him (it changes all the time), which was faxed on 8/2, and it said an order from a court of competent jurisdiction.  This is somewhat nebulous, but NH has jurisdiction over the child's custody. Now they insist only Utah can compel them to release him...but again, they won't put this in writing.  They could easily choose to release this child.  They simply WON'T.

The bottom line is:  Redcliff decided to accept this child based on a highly questionable and incomplete application, his mother saying he was troubled, and a signature to charge the credit card of her 3rd ex-husband. They disregarded the findings of his evaluating psychologist.  At that point, they accepted responsibility for this.  Morally, at least (legally remains to be seen) they have no right to deny my husband access to his son.  But they very arrogantly state their "policies" allow them to do so.  I find it very hard to believe that any BUSINESS has the right to keep a parent from his child.  It's the moral equivalent of kidnapping.  None of this makes any sense.  

I know there are children who are so out of control, their parents feel they have no choice but to send them away.  I know they must AGONIZE over such a decision. They've sent their kids through intensive outpatient therapy, and worked hard to help them. But that's not the case here.  Aside from a couple of "family counseling" sessions, no other avenues were explored.  This was practically a FIRST COURSE OF ACTION.  It's like swatting a fly with a bulldozer.  He's a normal kid with an out-of-control mother.  She is hoping he will return to her fully submissive and malleable.
 :nworthy:  

I really have to wonder how many parents have gone through this.  This is not new to Redcliff, as they have a specific provision in their enrollment contract that addresses "WITHDRAWAL AS A RESULT OF A CUSTODY DISPUTE".  I only have a faxed copy of this, and the print is so tiny and messy, it's hard to read.  I'm trying to get a better copy. If any former Redcliff parents have a legible copy of this form, please let me know!!! But it looks like they charge an early termination fee of $750.00, and looks like there are no refunds of tuition...it's basically an agreement that they will accept NO liability for anything.  Well, all I can say is my husband DIDN'T SIGN their agreement.  Just as he DIDN'T SIGN their agreement to let them RESTRAIN his son, or prevent him from speaking to him, or seeing him, or bringing him home.  The more I write, the more incensed I become.

It seems they are leaving us no choice.  Unfortunately, legal action is slow, and the child will be out before we ever see a courtroom.  But.....JUST MAYBE we can do something to keep this from happening to another parent and another innocent child.  They CHOOSE to disregard the parent's rights, and the child's right to due process.  And they are GETTING AWAY WITH IT. They have to be stopped.

Troll Control:
Just a thought...

Since people are telling you things that they won't put in writing, are you recording your conversations?  It's perfectly legal as long as ONE party is aware of the taping.  Tapes like that can be powerful evidence.

I agree Family Court is complete BS.  They kick the can down the road for months until it's too late, but wouldn't have acted anyway, in a timely or other fashion.

I support the advice you were given earlier in this thread.  Retain an aggressive, experienced attorney and DON'T LET UP.

When it's all said and done, sue for compensatory and punitive damages and for legal fees.

Don't believe the lines that the program feeds you over where jurisdiction lies.  Retain an attorney who WANTS to help you figure things out.  Stonewalling, dissembling and outright prevarication are trademarks of the industry.  don't let them play this game with you.

Most of all, realize that the law IS on your side, but getting civil servants to act is not an easy task.  Light the fire under them.  Also be aware that your gratification lies far down the road.  You will have to stick it out.

These programs win by simply NOT LOSING.  The longer they drag it out, the more money they make before they have to return the goose that lays their golden eggs.

You're looking at your WATCH, they're looking at the CALENDAR.  

Good luck and stay strong...

Anonymous:
Again I say call the Child Welfare Agency in that state they must respond to reports of abuse and or neglect that is the Federal Law.  Also to deny mail to a child is not a parents option - it is a violation of their civil rights even people in prison get their mail.  Often times programs may open the mail for only purposes of checking for drugs etc, but it is truly a violation of their civil rights.  

Go get this child - go to the courts in Utah with an order from the Courts in NH and either they will honor it or will do their own.

Good luck.
Andrea
pfrr.org

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page