Does Deborah's Anti-Psychiatry posts help anyone?

[001010]

On 2005-06-27 12:39:00, Deborah wrote:

"001010,

You missed the point. Easy to do since the topic was derailed from 'Sex Survey' to 'Sex Education'.



The issue was that 6th graders participated in a Sex 'Survey' without their parents knowledge or consent.

If it is appropriate for kids to be educated on the nitty-gritty specifics of sex in school, it certainly should be done with more thought than giving them a survey to ascertain when they last had sex, gave a blow job, had anal sex, and if they wore a condom.

That is not 'education'. That is information gathering, and for who's benefit?

Further, the parents were not allowed to view the survey, for fear they might 'misinterpret' the questions. I guess the district assumes their 11 year olds comprehend the subject matter better than their parents.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:





[ This Message was edited by: Deborah on 2005-06-27 12:41 ]"

You're right.

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.

--Thomas Jefferson

[Paul]

On 2005-06-27 19:20:00, Deborah wrote:

"

Argue the 'expert' opinions I post."

Ginger told me to post my items once, that is it.

What is up with you posting essentially the same
topic over and over again by these 'expert' resources?

Once is enough.

How about going by Gingers request too?

[Deborah]

Dude, take it up with Ginger.
Your desperation to silence the 'opposition' (truth) is too obvious.
What's taking up unnecessary bandwidth and derailing the discussion is posts necessary to contradict your erroneous assumptions and allegations.

[Paul]

On 2005-06-30 19:48:00, Deborah wrote:

"

Dude, take it up with Ginger.

Your desperation to silence the 'opposition' (truth) is too obvious.

What's taking up unnecessary bandwidth and derailing the discussion is posts necessary to contradict your erroneous assumptions and allegations.

"

I never said to silence it. I offer people the
best referral that I can. Find me the post where
I said to be silent, show me.

I don't invalidate the 25 million that are satisfied with their psychiatric care, you do, why?

How did you say it: silence the 'opposition' (truth). I am not in some sort of sport, are you?
There are no sides, these are poeople's lives.

There are choices, let people make them.

I help people that ask questions. If I know of a referral I offer it. I don't criticize or influence their choices. Why is it so necessary for you?

I did take it up with Ginger. She said post it
once and that is it. You on the other hand ...

---

BTW - you asked that person you preferred to hear
here own experience with medications, and which one. Are you going to provide us with the same courtesy?

Which medications have you taken?

What is your involvement with individuals with mental illness? I know in the paste you said none to this question. Has it changed?

Have you been with a symptomatic mentally ill patient since I last asked you?

[Deborah]

Who ?IS? Paul? Curious?
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... m=9#114154

[Anonymous]

Deb, perhaps you need some of Pauls's meds so you stop harrasing him!

[Anonymous]

Paul, I have some questions for you.

1: Paul, a regular around here.

Why?

2: For those who don't understand my position, on all subjects: Understand the law and your rights.

I do. I don't understand you, or your insatiable need to condem, and castigate others.

Make sure you have the freedom of choice.

I do. I don't understand your desire to remove others freedoms, by attacking and castigating them. You don't appear to follow your own rules. Perhaps you'd care to explain.

Seek and receive unbiased information and
know the source of information.

Your information comes from where? How am I to be sure it's unbiased? From your style of posting, and your incessant need to condemn others, it seems everything you say is biased, and tainted. Care to address this inconsistency?

[Paul]

On 2005-07-02 06:59:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Paul, I have some questions for you.

Your information comes from where? How am I to be sure it's unbiased? From your style of posting, and your incessant need to condemn others, it seems everything you say is biased, and tainted. Care to address this inconsistency?"

Well, let's see here anonymous, when I post click the link to see where it came from.

I condem others? Really.

Asking others not to invalidate any treatment they chose for mental illness ... are you sure that is condemming.

I think everything I say is linear, and clear.
Do you read what I post with foggy glasses on or something? It is not that complicated.

Like I said, I believe there is a comprehension problem not a content problem.

[Antigen]

Oh of course, Paul! We're all wrong, mistaken, too stupid to understand your exquisite postulations. It's all so clear now! We're all mentally ill and in need of your services. Why, if you could only get us all on drugs, then we'd all agree w/ your brilliant assessments and conclusions.

 :roll:

I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.
--Frank Lloyd Wright, American architect

[Anonymous]

Why, if you could only get us all on drugs, then we'd all agree w/ your brilliant assessments and conclusions.
"

Nah, Ginger, I've pretty much done every drug I can get my hands on, and I still think he's a fucking idiot.

[Antigen]

Well then, you must be taking the wrong drugs! Try some SSRIs or some regent quality amphetamines. If those don't help you come to admire and respect everything that proceedeth from the frantic keyboard of our resident helper, never fear! Maybe you're just psychotic and we have a whole line of antipsychotic drugs to try out on you. Failing that, you might try staring into a fluorescent light for while. That'll help you see more clearly. Be patient! It's a matter of trial and error...

A man is accepted into a church for what he believes and he is turned out for what he knows.
Anonymity Anonymous
return undef() if /coercion/i;