On 2005-06-16 11:51:00, Paul wrote:
"I am 49, when I was in school there was a demand
from students to augment the curriculum with
more relevant classes.
I too am in the "forty something" category. I remember that our sex ed consisted of learning about body parts and their function. We learned the mechanics of reproduction (not necessarily the sex act, but rather that the sperm fertilized the egg kinda thing ::blushing:: ). And we were segregated into male/female groups. I attended with my mother. She was able to support me afterward and answer any questions that may arise. Fast forward 20 plus years to our children's experience.
Learn about anal, oral sex. (I don't think I knew about such things until my later high school years.... I know I was naive :smile: ) in the classroom setting. Learn how to properly use a condom by practicing on a banana in a mixed peer group. Talk about any sexual experience in mixed company. Etc, etc, etc.
It is not "sex education" per say that I am opposed to. Kids need to know about the mechanics, etc. And in todays world of disease, they need to know about AIDS, HPV, and teen pregnancy rates. I know that not all parents take it upon themselves to educate their children. I guess my beef is that in our school district it is a part of the "normal curriculum". I had to jump through hoops to get the district to waive the required high school course. My kids were more interested in academia and prepping for college than "learning" what has been a life long discourse in our home.
I don't blame the school district. It is a societal problem.