On 2005-06-16 07:02:00, Anonymous wrote:
The worst part is that these kids are NOT going to be mistreated on camera. Millions of parents will get a false positive impression of BM programs, and will be all the more willing to consider using them.
Yes, this is very, very true. Anybody else catch the sick joke ABC played on their
Desperate Housewives audience?
Obviously, ABC is not the least bit interested in the truth of this matter. Big surprise!
Now, imagine this, radical as it may seem. What if we didn't have Big Brother (FCC) holding up a virtual blockade of the public airwaves? What if anyone who could hobble together a transmitter and some content could pick up a license for $150 or so, which would bind them to stick to their frequency and power limits and then broadcast whatever they wanted to? What if you didn't have to be a politically connected millionaire to get your side of any issue out there?
As it stands, freedom of the press belongs eclusively to those who own a press. Way back when, presses were expensive. Now it's a purely artificial scarcity.
I think it's funny as hell that the manor infotainment networks are now dedicating broadcast time to bloggers. Was anyone surprised when the bloggers started busting them out on their slipshod work?
I wonder if the onld hams are still campaigning to knock FCC out of the game?
I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants.
-- A. Whitney Brown
_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
Drug war POW
Seed `71 - `80
Straight, Sarasota
10/80 - 10/82
Anonymity Anonymousreturn undef() if /coercion/i;