Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore
Sue Scheff
Gmom:
What kind of "business" would recommend a place where the owner is accused of abusing kids? It would see that the logical and smart thing to do would be wait and see what is decided in the court.
Is P.U.R.E. just blindly believing the Sudweeks, without even looking at the evidence??? Seems to me, that if Sue is knowingly sending kids to Whitmore and Cheryl is found guilty, she is leaving herself open to all kinds of trouble. The fees she receives must be really high to take that kind of risk.
Anonymous:
I've always wondered:
When Sue Scheff removed her daughter from the big bad abusive WWASP school---what kinder,gentler, NICER, SAFER, school...the type that "BRINGS FAMILIES BACK TOGETHER" did Sue Scheff REFER HER OWN DAUGHTER TO????????
Because everybody KNOWS Sue Scheff WAS referring kids to these facilities then...WWASP schools included.
Anonymous:
Does Sue Scheff PURE have any legal/moral obligation to disclose to the parents that she and her organization referred to Whitmore Academy that Cheryl Sudweeks has been charge with 7 counts of child abuse?
Ms. Scheff should at least assume that the Sudweeks have not notified the parents of these criminal charges.
What is the "Educational Consultants" obligations to the parents who have children placed in a school and criminal charges are then brought against the owners?
Anonymous:
Good question!
Should Sue Scheff have disclosed to the parents of the kids she had referred THERE that the Sudweeks were under investigation for child abuse the moment she became aware?
Did Sue Scheff place herself under some type of liability by continuing to place children at the Whitmore knowing the Sudweeks were being investigated for child abuse, and not disclosing this fact to the parents ?
Anonymous:
Questions, but no answers....as usual
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version