- Students have a Right to Protection

Back to Article List

HEADLINE: STUDENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTECTION
BYLINE: Miller Newton
PUBLISHED: August 13, 1985", Tuesday; Page A-19 (ill.) (15 in.)
SECTION: OPINION
TYPE: OP-ED
NOTES: Dr. Miller Newton is president and clinical director of KIDS of Bergen County, a private, nonprofit organization based in River Edge that helps young people with drug and alcohol problems.
TEXT:

     The decision by the Becton Regional High School trustees to require students to take a drug and alcohol test is a strong stand on behalf of a drug-free environment in school. The action has stirred up a major controversy among teachers, school officials, and civil libertarians. The latter group sees the decision as a violation of students' rights. But I think that the issue in this case is: What kind of rights are we defending for students?

     The school board's position is to defend the kids' rights to a safe, non-threatening environment for the purposes of another fundamental right of the young in America, a public education.

     Our legal system embodies a number of protective rights for those beneath the age of majority. We protect them from abuse by adults, including their own parents. With child-labor laws we protect them from abuse in the work setting. We protect them from financial responsibility, meaning debt and civil-court liability, because they're not yet prepared to handle decisions in those areas.

     Given the basic principle that society has an obligation to protect minors from physical and psychological danger, the decision by Becton officials embodies protection for the basic right of growing up safely. But urine screening, which the board has ordered, is not a panacea. Those of us who have worked in the field know that a lot of teen-agers and young adults successfully pass the urine screen even though they're regular drug users.

Given the difficulty of urine sampling as a technique for providing a safe and drug-free environment, I suggest that not all students be tested but only those who show evidence of a problem. This would require training of all school personnel -- not only counselors, teachers, and administrators but also cafeteria, maintenance, and bus personnel -- to recognize the simple symptoms of intoxication by alcohol, marijuana, or other substances. Where there is evidence of possible intoxication, that individual would be required to have a urine screen immediately.

The same principles should apply here that apply to the Breathalyzer test in driving. The student would have the right to refuse the test, but that would mean automatic suspension from school -- just as there is automatic suspension of the driver's license for a motorist who refuses to take the Breathalyzer test.

Young people have a right to education as long as they're capable of taking advantage of that education. Not only is learning impossible for an intoxicated student, he interferes with others' rights to education in safety.

From my work with teen-agers who have drug problems, I know how heartbreaking it is to watch the struggle of young people who've struggled to become drug free, to see them go back to school and be exposed to the aroma of marijuana and to the pressure of their peers, and to watch them regress. I believe that kids who have a drug problem and have undergone treatment with the support of their families have the right to be protected from exposure to drugs in a publicly run institution. After all, drug use is a violation of city, state, and federal laws.

Teen-agers haven't developed mature decision-making processes, which is one of the major tasks of the adolescent developmental period. There's no way that they can make a good choice about drugs.

They're particularly vulnerable, physically and psychologically, to the drug high, because they lack the qualities in the psyche that resist addiction. Consequently the idea that kids ought to make free choices flies in the face of our knowledge about adolescence and our legal concept of protecting underage people from dangerous situations beyond their ability to cope.

<END>
CAPTIONS: Staff illustration by Rodrick Eyer
TERMS: STUDENT. RIGHT. DRUG. ALCOHOL. TEST. EDUCATION. SCHOOL. YOUTH
ORDER NUMBER: 974010
NOTICE: Copyright 1985 Bergen Record Corp.

Back to Article List