and the ones that ARE radical, and the ones very strongly opinionated about HLA, are not radicals becouse they are just angry at society and whatnot (the way most radicals are) but becouse they trusted someone and they got burned, and they feel a responsibility to inform other people in the same situation that they were in, that they also will get burned. some people like to communicate in a calm, respectful demeanor regardless of their emotions. HLA is very masterfull at this (particularly john mcmillon/function junction), which is why parents tend to listen to them more. but parents, please understand that when you hear some angry rhetoric, or some very emotional testimony, DONT DISMISS IT! just becouse someone is radical, or very emotional, even vulgar in the way they talk doesnt mean they are not telling the truth. in fact, usually it's the opositte. someone had to do something to them for them to get so angry!!!
And also remember that people posting on this site are not angry 14/15 year olds who are pissed of at their parents for sending them away. the majority of the "survivors" posting here are of college age or older, while many others are in fact parents and ex-employees.
now tell me, who would have more credibility, someone who's livelyhood depends on making parents think and believe good things about a program (i'm talking about HLA and their trolls [FJ/JR]) or someone who is not making any money whatsoever, yet is spending hours typing on a board on their own voulition, becouse either they have been victimized or becouse their concience wont let them sleep.
