I hope you will entertain more questions.
One that's been discussed at great length is the license issue. Is HLA a traditional boarding school or a theraputic one?
Also why are students kept from communicating unrestricted with their parents? I can understand limiting who they speak with, but not what they say. I myself was often made to rewrite letters if they contained passages such as "this place sucks" or simply "I dont like it here".
As much as I understand your preference for not revealing your name or position. Would you be willing to choose a user name? It would make things easier with communicating.
Again I thank you for your respectful nature and hope that we can continue the civil nature of the conversation. "
Okay, Robert, I have given myself a user name. I am going to try to answer these two questions to the best of my ability, though I am not sure the answers will be suficient to you. I will take the easy one first.
Why are students limited on what they can say? I don't question what you were told when you were at HLA. That is not my place. I can only tell you what students are told now. Ironically, students are specifically told now that they CAN say that they don't like it here. What they are told they cannot do is be disrespectful or lie. For example, a student CAN say, "I am so pissed off at my counselor. He put me on restriction and I don't think he even cares about me." A student CANNOT say, "My fucking counselor is an asshole. He put on restrictions for bullshit and told me to piss off because he doesn't care what happens to me." Now, if a counselor actually said that to a student (which would be highly unlikely), the student has every right to go to an administrator and let them know what was going on and the administration would take care of it.
I hope this anwers your question on this.
The second question is a bit trickier. I have seen the debates rage on about this. Again, I will not get into a circular argument over this. I will let you know my perception from when I was there and let others take it however they wish.
The answer is that HLA is both traditional and therapeutic. Obviously, HLA is therapeutic. Noone could ever realistically claim that it is not. When HLA first sought out accreditation from the Souther Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) it sought to be accredited as a special needs school. When the SACS committee came visit HLA, THEY suggested that HLA change its application to that of a traditional school. They suggested this based on their observations. This is not something that HLA sought out. When this was suggested, HLA would have been crazy not to follow up on it. Being accredited as a traditional school would be a huge benefit to its students. It would mean that any credits they obtained would be able to transfer to any boarding school or college in the country without question. As you can imagine, this would be huge for the HLA students and would be a wonderful selling point for the school. I have never understood why people are upset with the school for taking this position. Perhaps it will help to know that it was at the suggestion of the SACS committee and not HLA seeking this out for themselves.
In terms of people considering HLA to be a RTC, I suppose I can see why people are upset because based on definitions given on this board it would seem to fall into that category (on paper). However, similar to the situation with SACS, when anyone who investigates HLA in terms of being an RTC comes to campus, they clearly see the difference between the two. There is no realistic comparison. If the state really wanted to regulate HLA, the more prudent thing to do would be to create a category between traditional school and RTC, because that is what HLA truly is. People who argue that point on this board are wasting their time. The reallity is that HLA is unique and the state is probably not going to spend the time and money developing a whole new set of criteria for a single school.
I hope this is of some benefit. These are the facts to the best of my knowledge based on my experiences while at HLA. I am sure that there will those who take what I have said that tear it up. That is fine. I am not going to get into a debate. They seem to only end up in name calling anyway, and I will not go there.
Take care.
209