Fornits
General Interest => Open Free for All => Topic started by: claremok on April 02, 2005, 10:51:00 PM
-
If his Doctor didn't give his Grandmother a paper bag with Zoloft samples
in it to give him, I wouldn't be writing this letter. I have never called anyone a liar
but I truly believe that Doctor Naumann lied.
I was just reading over the Doctor's testimony. He said and I quote " The only indications he had that Pittman might be depressed were a response to a question that he was having trouble sleeping." end of quote.
Will someone tell me why in heavens name was he put on Zoloft ????????
You don't put a child of twelve on Zoloft because he is having trouble sleeping.
That was criminal. He should be held responsible for his action.
He also said that the last time he saw him, two days before the killings" he looked fine"
You have a 12 year old on 50 mg of Zoloft and just coming off of Paxil and your saying
that he looked and seemed fine, If he was in the Doctors office, then the Doctor never looked at him. Of course we have no way of proving this, but common sense tells us
what condition Christopher Pittman was in, being on a mind altering drug. How can the
Doctor say that he looked fine?
Also, How can the Jury say that Christopher Pittman was guilty beyond a margin of
a doubt? Was his confession tapped or filmed? No. Had they taken a blood test? No. Was there an attorney there for him? No. Also, when the prosecutor stood up and aimed
that gun at that plastic head, the jurors saw a full grown man shooting them, not a
twelve year old.
What kind of a jury did he have when they sent out a note to the Judge
asking if this fifteen year old boy was being tried as an adult? Where were they for the two weeks of the trial?
And why was there so much damaging evidence against the drug company held from the Jury? They weren't told that the Attorney General from New York
had filed a law suit against the Paxil company in June of 2004.
Clare