Fornits

Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => The Troubled Teen Industry => Topic started by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 03:35:00 PM

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 03:35:00 PM
Let me help the owner or moderator of this mess:

1- Carey is a horribly despicable person for accepting money from WWASP.  There is no excuse for what she's done.  If she feared the subpoena power of WWASP, then why not wait until it was issued and then act in accordance with the Court Order, or try to fight the subpoena?

That she accepted money from the organization abusing children, and afterwards cloaked her misdeed in fear of the law is an extremely clear message that Carey has no integrity whatsoever and that she is now, in addition to being a bad mother, a complete coward.

2- The moderator (Antigen?) is clearly smoking grass while posting her position of sympathy to Carey's position.  Antigen, you seem to be a survivor.  I'm curious to know how you can take the position that these organizations are bad, and then defend someone, in any way, who just profited financially by accepting money from it and, at the same time, helped to further WWASP's mission of torturing children?

3- Froderick13.  You're right about everything.  The problem here is that you are trying to shock everyone into seeing it your way, or maybe this is just you, though I doubt it from how clearly intelligent you are underneath the rhetoric.  Anyhow, the problem about this board that you need to come to terms with is that its moderator, owner or whatever has virtually no control over it.  She let's it run absolutely out of control.  She pretends to be neutral, yet she becomes hostile when someone goes from just bitching behind his or her keyboard to provoking some worthwhile thought.  It's funny to no end, but very unhelpful to the cause of shutting down WWASP and its partners.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 03:43:00 PM
Quote
The problem here is that you are trying to shock everyone into seeing it your way, or maybe this is just you, though I doubt it from how clearly intelligent you are underneath the rhetoric.

Thank you, and I guess that it's a little of both.  :grin:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: ehm on December 14, 2003, 03:47:00 PM
I thought Carey was against wwasp?

Was this a settlement? Can someone fill me in a little on this please?

Don't worry about temptation--as you grow older, it starts avoiding you.  
-- Old Farmer's Almanac

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 04:22:00 PM
Carey is AC/DC on the subject, but oh how she likes WWASP's money!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 04:26:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 12:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"

Let me help the owner or moderator of this mess:



1- Carey is a horribly despicable person for accepting money from WWASP.  There is no excuse for what she's done.  If she feared the subpoena power of WWASP, then why not wait until it was issued and then act in accordance with the Court Order, or try to fight the subpoena?



That she accepted money from the organization abusing children, and afterwards cloaked her misdeed in fear of the law is an extremely clear message that Carey has no integrity whatsoever and that she is now, in addition to being a bad mother, a complete coward.

The anon poster is obviously hitting the crack pipe. We've established that the anon eye witness who ran to the keyboard to alert us all about the deposition and that it has nothing to do with PURE had to be one of Sue Scheff, her lawyer, a WWASP lawyer or some invisible person.  

In other words, unless it was Carey herself (which seems unlikely), this news comes from people who make their living by taking payments from these programs. But they're not just delivering data that might be gotten by other means. They deliver real, live human beings, by force and without due process.

Worse yet? Just like Lon Woodbury pretending to be an industry watchdog, they cloak their misdeeds in the pretense of rescuing children from abusive programs! Then they bully and abuse anyone who questions them or their high holy cause and accuse us all of trying to prevent kids from being saved from abusive programs.  ::noway:: It would be funny if only it weren't so damned sad!

Now, all you piranhas who come out whenever you think you smell some Carey blood insist that it's all about the money, no way in hell WWASP ever threatened Carey like they do everyone else and that the only explanation is a list of presumed character flaws in Carey. But it's pretty obvious to anyone who's given a little time and attention to this brawl that there's a whole lot more going on here.  


Quote

2- The moderator (Antigen?) is clearly smoking grass while posting her position of sympathy to Carey's position.  Antigen, you seem to be a survivor.  I'm curious to know how you can take the position that these organizations are bad, and then defend someone, in any way, who just profited financially by accepting money from it and, at the same time, helped to further WWASP's mission of torturing children?

And I might ask you the same.

Quote

3- Froderick13.  You're right about everything.  The problem here is that you are trying to shock everyone into seeing it your way, or maybe this is just you, though I doubt it from how clearly intelligent you are underneath the rhetoric.  Anyhow, the problem about this board that you need to come to terms with is that its moderator, owner or whatever has virtually no control over it.  She let's it run absolutely out of control.  She pretends to be neutral, yet she becomes hostile when someone goes from just bitching behind his or her keyboard to provoking some worthwhile thought.  It's funny to no end, but very unhelpful to the cause of shutting down WWASP and its partners.



"


Ok, now that's funny, even though it is pretty sad. Frod's a good guy. And you're right, he's extremely intelligent. But nobody's always right.

As to the moderator of this forum, please take a quick look at the topic list. This forum is moderated by Nobody. It is an unmoderated forum. Once again, I have total dominion over machines and software, not over you.

See, you just want to shut down WWASP. I want to shut down the practice of kidnapping kids and subjecting them to powerful and dangerous thought reform programs altogether, no matter what brand name they're operating under.

Indeed, I am a survivor of both The Seed and Straight and I narrowly escaped a stint at LIFE. As such, I'm unimpressed with the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" philosophy.

But, since you've decided to start posting again, care to answer some of my questions? You could start with telling me who wants to know all this about my thoughts and motivations. From there, I hope you'll finally get around to demonstrating how, exactly, PURE is any different from WWASP.

But probably not.  

Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other.
--James Madison

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 04:48:00 PM
Let me see if I understand you. Your Encounter Group format is a defense for hosting free-for-alls, that make the survivors of these atrocities look our of control and helps to prove that Behavior Modification is not necessary and you're just an innocent bystander, who does not use technology to censure people - hmmm.

And you know I'm "posting again" how?

If you so clever, who am I?

By the way, why insult Froderik13.  I acknowledged that his base argument is right.  That's funny how?

Carey took money, when she could have given the information to WWASP involuntarily and for free.  After that, Miss "why would anyone be interested in my thoughts", there is nothing else!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: ehm on December 14, 2003, 05:10:00 PM
Why is Carey taking money a huge deal? Why do it for free, if you could get paid? We're not talking about sex here... :roll:  I feel sorry for Carey. Hell, from the way it sounds, she's had a sharp, long drag through the mud already. Give her a break!!!

Why don't you focus on something productive instead of a flame war!

How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate, they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to.
George Orwell, 1984

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 05:18:00 PM
Her taking money has become a "huge deal" only because it's like working in a porno-shop and not admitting you work for mobsters who use the money to harm society and its members.

Now, I didn't say Carey isn't shrewd, she is, for taking the money, but it's not morally right.  You can't say I'm against this person or that organization and then get in bed with them or it (sorry Carey).

My focus isn't Carey, believe it or not, it's the manner in which this board works against the cause of closing "Behavior Modification" schools.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 05:21:00 PM
Right on, Morli.  From your lips to these flamers ears.  Enough is enough.  

 :roll:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 05:23:00 PM
Carey took money?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 05:31:00 PM
Morli, you're a God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 05:33:00 PM
12,500 dollars  :sad:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 06:00:00 PM
Just would like to paticipate that is all ::drummer::  ::read::
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 06:21:00 PM
No, you clearly don't understand at all. The "encounter group" format you see is entirely in your imagination. This is just a web forum. You might say it's based loosley on a Usenet format if, anything.

I'm not trying to prove anything. I have my views on the behavior mod methods broadly used in the troubled parents industry. But I have enough faith in my convictions that I think the truth can stand by itself without any strong arming from me.

Here are some of the things I will censor without hesitation: credible threats against an individual; private information, such as SS#'s or private email; kiddie porn or beastiality (thankfully, haven't had to deal with that yet in these forums!).

W/ some hesitation, and after every other means have failed, I will censor spam and flooding because one man's spam is another man's demonstration. It's always a subjective call, so I hate to risk shutting someone down just because I missed their point. But that's about it.

I prefer it if people don't burn up a lot of disk space and bandwidth on personal attacks and obscenity. But one man's obscenity is another man's poetry. Again, I'd rather presume innocence and err on the side of liberty.

I know you're posting again because it's just so highly unlikely that some different person would happen to get the same IP address as you and hold so consistently to the same views as you do. But I wouldn't know any more about you without legal proceedings (which, as far as I know, are not anywhere near warranted) or criminal hacking, which is just something I don't do.

Finally,
Quote
Carey took money, when she could have given the information to WWASP involuntarily and for free. After that, Miss "why would anyone be interested in my thoughts", there is nothing else!


Again, clearly you're not taking my meaning. I didn't ask why anyone would be interested in my thoughts. Why do you put that in quotes asif I'd said that? Are you being intentionally misleading here? What I asked, and you haven't answered, is who wants to know?

Don't get me wrong, you're as welcome as anyone to post anonymously. But you sure have a lot of questions and few answers. But if you expect me to take you seriously, it would help if I knew who I was talking to. That's just the way it is. You know everything in the world about me, true or not, and all I know about you is what you post here. And, aside from your opinion of some other relative stranger, that ain't much info, ya' know?

To your mind there may be nothing else but your smoking gun indictment. But I see a whole lot more going on here. Are you making money off the ed CON business? Are your kids in a program now or have they graduated one? Do you now or have you ever worked or proselytize for WWASP? What is your interest in this matter, anyway? See, without your telling me these things, I have no way of knowing, except to guess. But at least I acknowledge that I'm guessing and don't jump to confusions.

Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves. When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.  -- My First Summer in the Sierra , 1911, page 110.
John Muir

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 06:30:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 14:23:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Carey took money?"


Yes, Carey took $12,500 from WWASP for the contents of her hard drive. She says they gave her a la plata o el plomo ultimatum; take the money or wait for a subpoena. That seems plausible as that just the kind of tone they usually take when they want something out of sombody. Mobsters indeed!

What you won't hear from the defendants in the suit is that they take money from the troubled parent industry every day. That's what they do for a living.

Just check out their website. http://helpyourteens.com (http://helpyourteens.com) All they'll tell you about how they make their money is that it doesn't come from the parents. Other ppl who seem fairly credible have said that they make their money in bounties paid by the programs to which they refer troubled parents. They also won't volunteer any information about which programs they refer these troubled parents to. But they do give the names of the two "escort" services they recomend. It's right at the foot of their front page. Can't miss it.

If you think yourself too wise to involve
yourself in government, you will be governed
by those too foolish to govern.  
--Plato

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 06:56:00 PM
The way I see it is that WWASP and PURE are the flip sides of the same coin, and Carey is just another victim of the teen help industry, like we all were/are.

The players here WWASP and PURE, and those other people attacking individuals here are just playing right into their game and deflecting the conversation away from important and topical issues.

So, those of you that are fond of attacking people here, I hope you are also fond of being used by people that for all intents and purposes resemble the people who fucked up your own childhood.  Here you are 10, 20, and 30 years later, using language and techniques you learned in group to attack other victims. This has become one big fucked up come down session, and like the old days, it has no meaning and no value except to belittle and humiliate people.  How weak and how pathetic.

Tell me, how far have you really come? Why are you still stuck acting like you are still an oldcomer with a questionable set of unsociable skills used to attack others?

To me, this whole discussion has been unproductive and irritating. Those responsible should be ashamed of themselves and re-evaluate their behavior.

 

Every man has a property in his own person.
This nobody has any right to but himself.
The labor of his body and the work of his
 hands are properly his.


--John Locke

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: ehm on December 14, 2003, 06:57:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 14:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Morli, you're a God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"


I like whoever wrote this.  ::bigsmilebounce::  :grin:

That's Goddess...hehehe  :wink:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 07:12:00 PM
GregFL seems to think he is some sort of analyst and that he is better than everyone else posting on this board.  That is Greg's theme.  Greg, I for one am pretty glad you're irritated, because you're just about the most boring person I have ever come accross!

What a doofus!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 07:23:00 PM
Antigen,

I get it, you think I'm Sue Sheff. No, no, no.  Oh my gosh, No.  That may be the greatest insult you have written all evening.  If Sue is doing what all of these businesses do that charge parents to get them to the torture houses, she's just as bad as WWASP.  So, I hope we've gotten that out of the way.

You and I don't see any of this the same way, which is fine, it's your forum.  But I don't think you're helping anyone here.

Bye!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 07:26:00 PM
Quote
By the way, why insult Froderik13. I acknowledged that his base argument is right. That's funny how?

Carey took money, when she could have given the information to WWASP involuntarily and for free. After that, Miss "why would anyone be interested in my thoughts", there is nothing else!

Not sure if this was already answered by antigen or not, but I don't think she touched on it. Thanks for sticking up for me, but I would have to disagree about one thing here. She could have given it up for free? Well, I agree with Morli in as much as why do that if you can get $. BUT, the question really is: Why did she get OFFERED the money for it to begin with? Did she go to them wanting 100,000 and get talked down? They might not have had any knowledge that Carey had anything to hand over if SHE hadn't gone to them in the first place. What really happened? Who should we really believe here?

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-14 16:28 ]
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 07:34:00 PM
She testified in the deposition that she went to them.  But on the money, I just want to clarify one thing, are you saying that you'd risk making trouble for a large group of injured parents and take $12,500.00, if you were in the same boat as them and they were confiding in you?  Or would you tell WWASP, go ahead and get your subpoena.  I'd do the "go get your subpoena" plan.  I don't like to be told what to do, especially when it's going to clearly hurt others and help the monsters win law suits just to shut-up people trying to speak out against them.

C'mon Froderik, you'd do the right thing!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 07:39:00 PM
Does you question here, Froderick, justify your behavior...your deeply offensive and insulting words?  Your discussing Carey's body parts in a highly disrepectfull and juvenile manner? Your alignment with a racist and someone who threatens people? Your threatening and offensive comments to people who have tried to bring a halt to this nonsense?

Really, Froderick, just how do you think this behavior affects your credibility... And in the bigger scheme of things, affects the credibility of this entire website and those that have worked many hours and even years to bring some credibility to this topic and to get people to understand what happened to us as children? Do you think your behavior furthers our cause?

Do you care?  

I do...and I am highly dissapointed in what has been occuring here and am at a lost in understanding your behavior.

I think you owe many people here an apology.

...and in all indictments for libels the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

(Jury nullification. It's not just a good idea, it's the law!)
Declaration of Rights, PA Constitution

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 07:39:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 15:56:00, GregFL wrote:

"The way I see it is that WWASP and PURE are the flip sides of the same coin, and Carey is just another victim of the teen help industry, like we all were/are.



The players here WWASP and PURE, and those other people attacking individuals here are just playing right into their game and deflecting the conversation away from important and topical issues.



So, those of you that are fond of attacking people here, I hope you are also fond of being used by people that for all intents and purposes resemble the people who fucked up your own childhood.  Here you are 10, 20, and 30 years later, using language and techniques you learned in group to attack other victims. This has become one big fucked up come down session, and like the old days, it has no meaning and no value except to belittle and humiliate people.  How weak and how pathetic.



Tell me, how far have you really come? Why are you still stuck acting like you are still an oldcomer with a questionable set of unsociable skills used to attack others?



To me, this whole discussion has been unproductive and irritating. Those responsible should be ashamed of themselves and re-evaluate their behavior.



 

Every man has a property in his own person.
This nobody has any right to but himself.
The labor of his body and the work of his
 hands are properly his.


--John Locke

"


No Anon, Greg is right on the money.  You just don't want to hear the truth because that would mean facing up to the reality that you and certain others have not progressed, but rather, regressed, and that is a terrible waste of yours and everybody else's time and energy.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: ehm on December 14, 2003, 07:39:00 PM
Drag back though the court system again? I'm sure all Carey wanted was to be left alone to live her life. She's been through enough.

No thanks!!!

I believe that human beings arrive on this Earth wanting to know absolutely everything, and the best thing we can do as parents is to get out of the way -- just be there to let them know what opportunities are there
-- Dorothy Werner, media liaison for the National Homeschool Association

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 07:52:00 PM
Sorry Greg.

Quote
Does you question here, Froderick, justify your behavior...your deeply offensive and insulting words? Your discussing Carey's body parts in a highly disrepectfull and juvenile manner? Your alignment with a racist and someone who threatens people? Your threatening and offensive comments to people who have tried to bring a halt to this nonsense?

You're a little off here. That woman pissed me off. Period. It wasn't about what she did, it was her behavior in the moment that did it for me. And man, I don't "align" myself with nobody. I was just sticking up for the guy. Yeah, I didn't think people were right in messing with him, even though...and that stuff was resolved peacefully in the end, believe it or not. If you don't believe me, go read the Elan forum. it won't kill you. I bite back when these anons start in on me. i won't apologize for that. I don't regret one bit of the nastiness to them. I do hopr that this doesn't put people off, BUT, I figure anyone with a pulse will understand (to some degree) my reactions.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 07:53:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 16:12:00, Anonymous wrote:

"GregFL seems to think he is some sort of analyst and that he is better than everyone else posting on this board.  That is Greg's theme.  Greg, I for one am pretty glad you're irritated, because you're just about the most boring person I have ever come accross!



What a doofus!"


(Sorry, the post below was in reply to the above quote by Anon, in response to his/her comments about Greg's posts.)
-------------------------------------------------

No Anon, Greg is right on the money. You just don't want to hear the truth because that would mean facing up to the reality that you and certain others have not progressed, but rather, regressed, and that is a terrible waste of yours and everybody else's time and energy.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 07:57:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 16:23:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Antigen,



I get it, you think I'm Sue Sheff. No, no, no.  Oh my gosh, No.  That may be the greatest insult you have written all evening.  If Sue is doing what all of these businesses do that charge parents to get them to the torture houses, she's just as bad as WWASP.  So, I hope we've gotten that out of the way.



You and I don't see any of this the same way, which is fine, it's your forum.  But I don't think you're helping anyone here.



Bye!"


No, actually I didn't think you were Sue. All those questions would apply to several ppl that I know of.

Whether it's my forum or not, it's still fine that we don't see things the same way. Like I said, I try very hard to keep some seperation between administration and participation. If you twist my arm and pimp slap me around enough and I come to the conclusion that I actually have a legal or moral obligation to censor something or ban someone, I'll do it. But I think it completely ruins any shot at intellectual integrity if someone's going behind the scenes trying to create the illusion that people who hold certain views just don't exist.

If it were your forum, would it not be fine for us to differ?

Now, just for the sake of an argument (or, dare I hope, a serious and civil discussion) let's put aside our differences on Carey's selling data to WWASP. Just one final word on that, if I may.

I don't think we're really that far appart on that anyway. I do believe there has already been significant collateral damage from that that Carey would not have wanted to inflict and that she just might (might) not believe is undeserved. That is based on her public statements here as well as a couple of private phone calls, wherein I've never caught her being inconsistent with the public statements. And I'm not entirely sure that she was really pushed into a corner. But it seems a bit more plausible to me than the idea that she's been a secret WWASP mole all along, just doing a damned good job at fooling everybody.

But aside from the data sale, have you ever read anything else she has to say? She had an insider's view of PURE and Trekers for a very long time and she's made some statements and asked some compelling questions about the whole ordeal. No one who would be in the know has ever addressed those questions as far as I know.

Here's one that I find just mind blowing. Apparently, when Carey was desperate to get her boys out of Dundee, she begged Amberly to just send a sworn affidavit that she could show the judge to make the case that the court should immediately order the boys out of Dundee and back to the States. I'm not real clear on the reasons she gave Carey for not doing this. It's probably there, but I'd have to go back and look. But Amberly refused to give these statements that might have helped her get her boys out of Dundee.

Then at the deopo, she found out (and posted publicly) that Amberly did make up a sworn affidavit after all at the time. She just wouldn't give it to Carey. Instead, she gave it to someone affiliated with PURE. Anyone, please feel free to jump in and correct me if I'm mistating any facts here.

So the court back in La set a hearing for some date in the future, leaving the boys in Costa till at least then. Next thing you know, here's Sue offering salvation at a heafty price. How much? That may be in the forums too, but I can't recall. But I thought it was 5 digits.

What she got for that price was the same damned escorts who normally kidnap kids from school or their beds to take them in to these programs. And they didn't even do any of the heavy lifting. All they did was show up and look mean and tough while Carey instructed Narvin to turn over her boys to her.

Couple of questions for you regarding that. First, did you read about any of that before just now? Do you believe it or not? Why or why not?

Now, assuming that it's wholely or partially true, what the hell are these people playing at? This, of course, would be mere speculation on our part. As I keep pointing out, no one who's in the know seems willing to volunteer any information about what's going on except to smear Carey. That alone stinks to high heaven.

To make certain that crime does not pay, the government should take it
over and try to run it

--G. Norman Collie

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: ehm on December 14, 2003, 08:03:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 16:52:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"Sorry Greg.



Quote
Does you question here, Froderick, justify your behavior...your deeply offensive and insulting words? Your discussing Carey's body parts in a highly disrepectfull and juvenile manner? Your alignment with a racist and someone who threatens people? Your threatening and offensive comments to people who have tried to bring a halt to this nonsense?

You're a little off here. That woman pissed me off. Period. It wasn't about what she did, it was her behavior in the moment that did it for me. And man, I don't "align" myself with nobody. I was just sticking up for the guy. Yeah, I didn't think people were right in messing with him, even though...and that stuff was resolved peacefully in the end, believe it or not. If you don't believe me, go read the Elan forum. it won't kill you. I bite back when these anons start in on me. i won't apologize for that. I don't regret one bit of the nastiness to them. I do hopr that this doesn't put people off, BUT, I figure anyone with a pulse will understand (to some degree) my reactions. "


This is what I was saying Froderik13. You really do owe Carey an apology. I'm sorry, but you have been completely out of line. I read your words, and think to myself, I hope he wouldn't talk to a woman like that in real life. It's actually frightning.


Save our planet; it's the only one with chocolate!

--Andi, domestic goddess

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 08:03:00 PM
I have read the Elan Forum Froderick, the entire thing. You see, It was Ginger and I that initiated contact with the Elan People several years ago and I have watched the forum with interest, hoping to someday establish a link between Art barker and Joe Ricci. I read the entire forum cover to cover and watched in bewilderment as you got involved and helped worsen an situation already out of control.

 I stand by my initial post. You owe a lot of people here an apology.


WHEN SPIDERS UNITE, THEY CAN TIE DOWN A LION  
-- Ethiopian Proverb

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:11:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 16:52:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"Sorry Greg.



Quote
Does you question here, Froderick, justify your behavior...your deeply offensive and insulting words? Your discussing Carey's body parts in a highly disrepectfull and juvenile manner? Your alignment with a racist and someone who threatens people? Your threatening and offensive comments to people who have tried to bring a halt to this nonsense?

You're a little off here. That woman pissed me off. Period. It wasn't about what she did, it was her behavior in the moment that did it for me. And man, I don't "align" myself with nobody. I was just sticking up for the guy. Yeah, I didn't think people were right in messing with him, even though...and that stuff was resolved peacefully in the end, believe it or not. If you don't believe me, go read the Elan forum. it won't kill you. I bite back when these anons start in on me. i won't apologize for that. I don't regret one bit of the nastiness to them. I do hopr that this doesn't put people off, BUT, I figure anyone with a pulse will understand (to some degree) my reactions. "


Frod, get over that woman pissing you off. What's done is done.  If you really want to get into it, stop swatting flies and take a bite out of the big enchilada (if you catch my meaning here). Go read the WWASPS v. PURE court documents and digest on the facts for awhile.  Who knows, it might just convince people you are sincere in getting to the truth, as opposed to beating a dead horse or worse, promoting Carey as the boogie-man to deflect attention away from the self-serving agenda of your alleged cohorts.

:grin:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:16:00 PM
Antigen:

While we may disagree on Carey and the ganging up on Froderick13, there is no disagreement between us about Sue Sheff.  If Sue took money to liberate kids and added some huge surcharge as I did read, by the way, in other threads that is 100% wrong.  Sheff represents to the public at large that she is the savior of all troubled kids selflessly fighting against WWASP,  It's obvious that's bullshit.  If she's making money by inducing parents to send kids, already messed up, to torture farms she's WWASP with another name.  Here, we agree.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 08:17:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 16:34:00, Anonymous wrote:

"She testified in the deposition that she went to them.  But on the money, I just want to clarify one thing, are you saying that you'd risk making trouble for a large group of injured parents and take $12,500.00, if you were in the same boat as them and they were confiding in you?  Or would you tell WWASP, go ahead and get your subpoena.  I'd do the "go get your subpoena" plan.  I don't like to be told what to do, especially when it's going to clearly hurt others and help the monsters win law suits just to shut-up people trying to speak out against them.



C'mon Froderik, you'd do the right thing!"


I think Carey's made it very clear that she does not view herself as being in the same boat as the defendants in this case. She's said it over and over again; if you didn't do anything wrong, what are you worried about? Hell, if someone wanted to spend the time, you could search on the net and find reams and volumes of me poking holes big enough to drive a truck through in that argument in different context. But it seems she believes that she wasn't hurting anyone who didn't need a good hurting.

That just seems a whole lot more plausible than to believe that this woman has suddenly suffered a personality transplant and now wants to help WWASP do to others what they've done to her.

The defendants in this case include some of the Trekers. The Trekers hold that they have nothing to do with PURE or with WWASP v PURE. I have a hard time swollowing that. However, I do see a pretty plausible explanation for the discrepancy in their perceptions. They got took by the old "enemy of my enemy is my friend" scam. Since WWWASP hates PURE and PURE makes nice noise about heroically rescuing kids from WWASP, then anyone who questions PURE for any reason must be working for WWASP.

And the Trekers made it abundantly clear that they'd tossed Carey out of their boat anyway and then proceeded to carry out a very Program like smear campaign against her. I don't share the view that everyone on the list deserves what they get. However, I can easily see how someone would have a hard time seeing any difference between this group and WWASP, given what has transpired over the last 7 months.

If only there were evil people somewhere, insidiously committing evil
deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:21:00 PM
To the other anon.  Your name is what, Mary Tyler Moore or are you Alice in Wonderland, and you just fell into the rabbit hole?  Nobody here is owed an apology on Carey and I stand by my comments on Greg.  Greg thinks he's Prof. Kingsfield from the Paper Chase TV Series and that tone would annoy most people.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:27:00 PM
Here we go, we're going to disagree again.  If Carey did one thing to accelerate the process in getting WWASP to the people who made the comments against WWASP it's flat out wrong.

The "personality transplant" did not come by accident, but by way of the twelve and a half grand.

Any way you look at it, it's tainted money.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:27:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:16:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Antigen:



While we may disagree on Carey and the ganging up on Froderick13, there is no disagreement between us about Sue Sheff.  If Sue took money to liberate kids and added some huge surcharge as I did read, by the way, in other threads that is 100% wrong.  Sheff represents to the public at large that she is the savior of all troubled kids selflessly fighting against WWASP,  It's obvious that's bullshit.  If she's making money by inducing parents to send kids, already messed up, to torture farms she's WWASP with another name.  Here, we agree."


100% wrong and 1,000% MORALLY reprehensible. Downright skanky, in other words.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 08:40:00 PM
Well, at least your not expressing your dislike for me by cussing, swearing, and trying to be totally offensive, but honestly, can you have any conversation without attacking others? Can't you just discuss ideas?

And I am sure those that know me personally are getting quite a kick out of you comparing me to some professor and calling me a dufus and boring.  You obviously don't know me....

Come in the evening, or come in the morning; Come when you 're looked for, or come without warning.
-- Thomas O. Davis (1814-1845): The Welcome.

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:41:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:21:00, Anonymous wrote:

"To the other anon.  Your name is what, Mary Tyler Moore or are you Alice in Wonderland, and you just fell into the rabbit hole?  Nobody here is owed an apology on Carey and I stand by my comments on Greg.  Greg thinks he's Prof. Kingsfield from the Paper Chase TV Series and that tone would annoy most people.



"


Oh, grow up, insult is insult. Frod13 stepped way over the line of appropriateness. You not seeing this throws you in the, "not old enough/mature enough to know better" catagory.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:52:00 PM
Greg:
If it's OK to call you Greg.  Where I am coming from is that there is a massive amount of hypocrisy on this board.  Look at all the threads. People talk their mind and it gets dicey, and then the owner kicks in with her two cents, which usually is the rambling of someone who smokes weed, and then sides with whoever can't defend themselves.  It doesn't even matter whether they're right or wrong.  Her shield seems to get raised when she's been personally offended, and then you get a long, wordy reply, which depending on how much she's been smoking can be very nasty.

As far as you are concerned, I've read some of your posts and they come accross in such a way so as to suggest you're coming from some higher moral ground.  

The Carey issue is a special issue, which has been discussed here for a long, long time.  Until this week, nobdy truly knew what was going on.  I can't speak for anyone but myself and I have to say that what she did is a major disappointment and while Froderick13 upset some people, his underlying message was correct.

Lots worse has been said on this board and I have not ever seen an apology.  Why should he be the first?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 08:55:00 PM
Anon:

What I see, is that this board is not the Queen's Annual Garden Party and that the owner has utterly failed to establish what is or is not proper to post on this board.

No rules = no apologies.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 08:58:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:27:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Here we go, we're going to disagree again.  If Carey did one thing to accelerate the process in getting WWASP to the people who made the comments against WWASP it's flat out wrong.

So then you think that anyone who says anything bad about WWASP must be the good guys? I might have thought so too if I didn't remember Straight badmouthing The Seed, Art badmouthing Synanon, SAFE badmouthing Straight, etc, ad nauseum.

It just doesn't hold up in the real world.

Now I believe there are innocent ppl hurt by what Carey did. I don't know if she sees that or not. Hell, I don't even know for sure if I'm right about that. It just seems most likely to me to be true.

There's just so much we don't know here that I don't see how anyone can pass judgement with 100% certainty.

I don't even know to a dead certainty that the programs PURE refers to are as bad as WWASP. I know that at least some of them accept involuntary private placement, otherwise they wouldn't use transport services. And, as alluded to above, I've seen that song and dance so many times it's pretty hard to believe it's going to end differently this time. I could be wrong. Time will tell. But I'm ponying up my bet right here and now. I believe that PURE is just another ed CON. I'll eat it later if I'm wrong.

Quote

The "personality transplant" did not come by accident, but by way of the twelve and a half grand.



Any way you look at it, it's tainted money."


All of our money is tainted. Do you buy anything made in China? How do you know it's not made by child slaves? Do you own or have you ever given someone a diamond? You may well have paid to have someone's foot cut off to prevent their running away with some of the daily take from the mines. Like veal? Drive a car? Then you have some responsibility for some of the people who've killed or died over oil.

Is anyone on this planet pure as the driven snow and innocent as a lamb? Only young infants. That's why people are so drawn to them, I think.

Homeschool is self regulating. The school board is not going to have illiterate useless people living in their homes forever if they don't have a working education policy.

--Sisterbluerose

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:06:00 PM
Antigen,
In your parallel the diamond buyer or the buyer of something made in China doesn't know for certain that the item they're purchasing caused the expoitation of another.  With Carey, there is no doubt that she took money from WWASP which literally celebrates their reputation of torturing children.  Also, Carey knew there were people who might be harmed by what she was doing.  If you liker and what she did then I say fine, but wow is that messed up!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 09:09:00 PM
Sure you can call me Greg as long as you tell me your name. Tit for tat.


Moral high ground? that is just some fantasy of yours. I have well formed opinions that come from many hours of researching my topic. If you disagree, then that is your right and I would hope that you would express your disagreement. That is why I participate here, for discussion.


That is also the right of the owner of this forum, Ginger. She is also a participant and is very well informed and has solid opinions. You don't agree with them so you get personal..just as you did with me..a very weak and old debating tactic  called ad hominem that just plain doesn't work and makes a fool out of the person that is doing the attacking.

               The body of
        Benjamin Franklin, printer,
      (Like the cover of an old book,
            Its contents worn out,
    And scripts of it's lettering and gilding)
       Lies Here, food for worms!
     Yet the work itself shall not be lost,
For it will, as he believed, appear once more
                 In a new
         And more beautiful edition,
          Corrected and amended
                By it's Author!

Epitaph for himself.

--Benjamin Franklin 1706-1790

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:09:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:55:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Anon:



What I see, is that this board is not the Queen's Annual Garden Party and that the owner has utterly failed to establish what is or is not proper to post on this board.



No rules = no apologies."


I'm not your mommy. It's not my place to establish for you what is and is not proper to post on this board.

Why do you have such a hard time with that? You want to see what an unmoderated forum full of rough players looks like after a number of years? Here
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=alt.l ... n=us&hl=en (http://groups.google.com/groups?q=alt.law-enforcement&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&edition=us&hl=en)

Legalizing drugs is far from a panacea for all the distress caused by drugs, but it will eliminate most of the profit and corruption from the drug trade.

--Nobel laureate, Gary S. Becker

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:12:00 PM
As I said an hour or two ago, we don't agree.  I didn't realize you two are a tag team.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:16:00 PM
By the way Greg, the tactic as you called it seems to work fine, just look at the stats on this thread, it's more than this tired old board has seen in such a short period of time in quire awhile.  By the way, your last sentence got a little personal, so you're catching on.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:18:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:52:00, Anonymous wrote:

Her shield seems to get raised when she's been personally offended, and then you get a long, wordy reply, which depending on how much she's been smoking can be very nasty.


No, my shield is raised whenever sombody tries to press me into involuntary servitude or whenever I feel the need to stave off the ad hominems in order to get at answer that I want. Ask Nazi. No, wait! ask Artman111.

Actually, I tend to be more gentle, philisophical, maybe boring to you, when I've had a toke or two. If you're looking for an excuse to discard anything I have to say that doesn't fit your views, that's just as good an excuse as any, I suppose. But it won't stop other people from simply discussing the issues and passing on the ad hominems.

WHEN SPIDERS UNITE, THEY CAN TIE DOWN A LION  
-- Ethiopian Proverb

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 09:20:00 PM
You called me Greg again.  


What is your name??

That which does not kill you can make you stronger, but I really never needed to be this strong.



Scott Wagner

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:21:00 PM
Antigen,
I understand your position better than you think.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:22:00 PM
Eleanor Roosevelt is my name.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:30:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 18:06:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Antigen,

In your parallel the diamond buyer or the buyer of something made in China doesn't know for certain that the item they're purchasing caused the expoitation of another.  With Carey, there is no doubt that she took money from WWASP which literally celebrates their reputation of torturing children.  Also, Carey knew there were people who might be harmed by what she was doing.  If you liker and what she did then I say fine, but wow is that messed up!"


Ok, if you buy 100 things made in China, you can safely assume that some of them were made with slave labour. Oh, and btw, you know to a dead certainty that an American lost their job when the merchant quit buying American and started importing from China.

I don't see how Carey made any money for WWASP. She took some of their profit and redirected it to, one would assume, housing, feeding, clothing and making Christmas for her sons. If I had a chance to take a few grand from Melvin Sembler without hurting anyone who didn't need hurting I'd jump on it.

Now think about that for a moment, please. One of the big problems I've had right from the get go with legal proceedings against Programs is that there are so many relatively innocent victims involved and the truely guilty have a way of skating free while their faithful chumps take the beating.

Carey didn't know about this industry till she found out that her ex had sent her sons there, what? just over a year ago? I can easily understand how someone in her position might make a mistake in thinking that everyone involved is a bad guy. It is essentially the same reason, I believe, why you have concluded, on spare evidence, that she's a bad woman. You have to be mad at someone and the real culprits are beyond your immediate reach.

Long term, if we can resist the urge to jump to conclusions and attack the easier targets, we might get down to the truth of the matter so that the real bad guys can't run their scam anymore because everyone sees them coming.

That's what I'm all about here. "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys. There's only you and me and we just disagree."--Gerry Garcia

Now, put that in your pipe and smoke it ::rainbow::

The worst government is the most moral. One composed of cynics
is often very tolerant and human. But when fanatics are on top,
there is no limit to oppression.

--H.L. Mencken



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
   10/80 - 10/82
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
Anonymity Anonymous
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:34:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 18:21:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Antigen,

I understand your position better than you think."


Well cool then! Greg must be rubbing off on me. (Doh!)

Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.
-- Emo Phillips

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 09:34:00 PM
Well Eleanor, we have something in common..my aunt is named eleanor.

In any event, this is Ginger's ballgame. She runs this forum as she sees fit. If I was in her position, I would leave any post that discussed the issue and promptly delete any or all ad hominem attacks. Ginger and I don't see eye to eye on this, but I understand and deeply respect her position on the matter.

So Eleanor, or whatever your name is...here is my deal. I don't give a shit whether you like me or agree with me, but I won't play personal attack games with you. If you want to disagree with me, bring it on...I love a good disagrement. If you want to poke fun and personally attack people, I would suggest you take your toys and go play with someone else.

If only there were evil people somewhere, insidiously committing evil
deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:36:00 PM
Actually Antigen, I don't think you would have taken the money under the same circumstances.  It may be the only compliment I'll pay you all night.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:37:00 PM
Very clever Greg.  Sorry, you're back to full doofus status again!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:40:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 17:52:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Greg:

If it's OK to call you Greg.  Where I am coming from is that there is a massive amount of hypocrisy on this board.  Look at all the threads. People talk their mind and it gets dicey, and then the owner kicks in with her two cents, which usually is the rambling of someone who smokes weed, and then sides with whoever can't defend themselves.  It doesn't even matter whether they're right or wrong.  Her shield seems to get raised when she's been personally offended, and then you get a long, wordy reply, which depending on how much she's been smoking can be very nasty.



As far as you are concerned, I've read some of your posts and they come accross in such a way so as to suggest you're coming from some higher moral ground.  



The Carey issue is a special issue, which has been discussed here for a long, long time.  Until this week, nobdy truly knew what was going on.  I can't speak for anyone but myself and I have to say that what she did is a major disappointment and while Froderick13 upset some people, his underlying message was correct.



Lots worse has been said on this board and I have not ever seen an apology.  Why should he be the first?"


Look, Froderick didn't just upset some people. He upset each and every person who read his posts only to find out whatever message the guy was trying to get out, had been said before, ad nauseum.  Bottom line, the guy isn't just crude, he is delusional (remember the post where he equated himself with being christ-like??) and unless and until he tires of this game he is playing and packs it in, he'll be yanking our chain 24-7.  One thing that does offer some hope for the guy is to show him exactly what went down during the past couple of months with the WWASPS v. PURE civil action. The guys simply does not have a clue but sooner or later, he will have to wise up.  (Let's just hope it is sooner, rather than later!)   :rofl:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:47:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 18:36:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Actually Antigen, I don't think you would have taken the money under the same circumstances.  It may be the only compliment I'll pay you all night."


Well thanks for that. I don't know that I wouldn't because I'm not sure I know all of the circumstances. There are conflicting accounts of the story, muddled with a lot of assumptions at this point.

In a big way, this is very like an out of hand PTA meeting. And I have seen a PTA meeting come pretty close to a riot before! There are the veteran players with various alliances and there are the folk who recently came on the scene. All the passion and outrage comes from the new players, regardless of their chosen alliances. I'm a vet. I'm cynical and skeptical as hell. The one thing I've learned over the years is that, no matter how much you think you understand, there's always more.

I don't have The Solution® I think we need to put a lot more heads together before we come up with a way to win. But I'm damned sure a veteran at not losing.

Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps.
-- Emo Phillips

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 14, 2003, 09:47:00 PM
That's what I'm all about here. "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys. There's only you and me and we just disagree."--Gerry Garcia


Ginger, great quote...but I believe the author is Dave Mason.

When Plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in a society, they create for themselves in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.
--Fredric Bastiat

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:49:00 PM
Oh, and Greg, as I keep saying to my online game addicted adoptive son, my mud's better than your mud! :razz:

We'll just see who's method pans out. I must admit, though, you were right about Bingo! Amazing!

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 09:56:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 18:47:00, GregFL wrote:

I believe the author is Dave Mason.


Damn you, Greg from Florida!!! You're probably right.

You should be allowed to do whatever you want with your own person and property, as long as you don't physically harm the person or property of a nonconsenting other.
Peter McWilliams - Ain't Nobody's Business If I Do

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:56:00 PM
I understand what you're saying and there is a valid point in what you say, but he's a GREAT noisemaker and considering the informality of the forum I would think it's easily something everyone can live with.  Not everyone can be a great wordsmith, and he is thought provoking (in a very good way).
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 09:59:00 PM
Antigen, I do know the facts and trust me, (figuratively, since you don't know me) I am a reasonably good judge of these things, based on what I've read, I have little doubt you would pass on the deal counteroffered to CB.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 10:00:00 PM
Just for clarification (that didn't read well). Antigen would not accept the deal offered to CB.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 10:00:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 18:40:00, Anonymous wrote:

and unless and until he tires of this game he is playing and packs it in, he'll be yanking our chain 24-7.


Done did it already, I think. Froderick is an alright guy. Just go back and read some of what he's had to say before the recent flame wars got going. You'll see.

I believe that human beings arrive on this Earth wanting to know absolutely everything, and the best thing we can do as parents is to get out of the way -- just be there to let them know what opportunities are there
-- Dorothy Werner, media liaison for the National Homeschool Association

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 10:17:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 19:00:00, Antigen wrote:

"
Quote

On 2003-12-14 18:40:00, Anonymous wrote:


and unless and until he tires of this game he is playing and packs it in, he'll be yanking our chain 24-7.




Done did it already, I think. Froderick is an alright guy. Just go back and read some of what he's had to say before the recent flame wars got going. You'll see.

I believe that human beings arrive on this Earth wanting to know absolutely everything, and the best thing we can do as parents is to get out of the way -- just be there to let them know what opportunities are there
-- Dorothy Werner, media liaison for the National Homeschool Association


"


Well, I'd be inclined to give the guy the benefit of the doubt (sans the really offensive and generally unwarranted personal attacks) but it does concern me that Froderick has wasted a great deal of time and energy on a red herring.  If the guy is as smart as you and others have said, then show me the money (just kidding).  What I mean, is give him the head's up on what's really going on in the WWASPS v. PURE song and dance so he can better judge who (if anybody) is the real villian.  Personally, I have no doubt the guy is capable of answering many of the questions posed to the "carey-sucks-club" (e.g. details about the preliminary injunction, names of the schools and programs, etc.) but if he is not willing to be objective, what's the point?  

I'm listening though ....

 :wink:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 10:33:00 PM
Quote
Bottom line, the guy isn't just crude, he is delusional (remember the post where he equated himself with being christ-like??) and unless and until he tires of this game he is playing and packs it in, he'll be yanking our chain 24-7.

I had to laugh when I read this. That's really funny - the fact that you took that comment seriously. And I know that I do have a tendency to flare up here and there (grin) but I wouldn't really call it a game. But that's allright, you all go on with things, I'll hang for a little bit..probably not for too long though, as I've got a few corpses I need to dispose of. I tried to raise them form the dead, but it didn't work out..so much for the "christ" thing..

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-14 19:35 ]
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 10:38:00 PM
Quote
This is what I was saying Froderik13. You really do owe Carey an apology. I'm sorry, but you have been completely out of line. I read your words, and think to myself, I hope he wouldn't talk to a woman like that in real life. It's actually frightning.

No way! You don't know her like I do..
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 10:48:00 PM
Quote
bewilderment as you got involved and helped worsen an situation already out of control.

Disagree with you here. I made peace with Black Gay Jew, lol. And what's going on there now? Have you looked lately? They're posting about Elan. The racist and that guy Coz are on speaking terms now, and I like to think that I had something to do with it.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 10:55:00 PM
I know, I'm in the way-back machine right now, well, a couple hours back anyway.

Quote
Carey as the boogie-man to deflect attention away from the self-serving agenda of your alleged cohorts.

I think you're advice was good anon, but this is what I'm trying to get. Is she a really "bogey-man" or is she a snitch? I don't like snitches...something seems funny about the fact that she ended up with all that dough, and TRIED to get $100.000. There must have been some GOOD PORN on that fuckin' hard drive, know what I mean, Vern? But I'm listening. I want someone to come out and say it in plain terms. why is Carey innocent. I know this is America, but I'm suspecting she's GUILTY until her actions make sense to me...Ohhh God...please, someone just tell me what the fuck is going on with that lady.
Or just stop talking to me...
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 10:57:00 PM
Quote
Oh, grow up, insult is insult. Frod13 stepped way over the line of appropriateness. You not seeing this throws you in the, "not old enough/mature enough to know better" catagory.

I got some insults for you you $%&&*$%#^%&#$%#$&$^ :rofl:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 10:57:00 PM
Carey, who'se Carey?    JUST KIDDING FROD
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 11:20:00 PM
Quote
Ginger: I don't see how Carey made any money for WWASP. She took some of their profit and redirected it to, one would assume, housing, feeding, clothing and making Christmas for her sons. If I had a chance to take a few grand from Melvin Sembler without hurting anyone who didn't need hurting I'd jump on it.

But what about what she gave them?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 11:24:00 PM
Quote
I can easily understand how someone in her position might make a mistake in thinking that everyone involved is a bad guy. It is essentially the same reason, I believe, why you have concluded, on spare evidence, that she's a bad woman

Spare evidence??
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 11:26:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:20:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"
Quote
Ginger: I don't see how Carey made any money for WWASP.

But what about what she gave them?

"


Well, so far she's said that she doesn't think any innocent person could be hurt by any of it and that she believed that WWASP would have gotten it anyway. Both claims are plausible. As no one can know the mind of another, I'll take her word for it and bet that she'll find out sooner or later that she was mistaken on both counts. And then maybe she'll also get an answer to her question about how parents can be so easily manipulated, tricked and cajolled into doing horrible things to their children while fully believing that they're the nobel martyrs.

But, of course, I could be wrong about a lot of things here. There's still a lot more rumor than substantiated fact floating around.

If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.
Anonymity Anonymous (http://fornits.com/anonanon)
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 11:28:00 PM
Quote
I understand what you're saying and there is a valid point in what you say, but he's a GREAT noisemaker and considering the informality of the forum I would think it's easily something everyone can live with. Not everyone can be a great wordsmith, and he is thought provoking (in a very good way).

Thanks, anon...whoever you are.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 11:29:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:24:00, Froderik13 wrote:



Spare evidence??


Yeah. Sort out the actual hard facts that you know from all the speculation about motives such, and I think you'll agree that we're running a horrible signal to noise ratio so far. It is getting much better just lately. But most of us are still largely in the dark.

If only there were evil people somewhere, insidiously committing evil
deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 11:30:00 PM
Not trying to bail on you here Ginger, but I've got to sign off...'night..
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 14, 2003, 11:31:00 PM
Ask not for which you shall never need not brought to the forefront of the pretentious misgivings due to the fact that the flyin rollin doughnut just passed not either in front nor afterwards behind the front end.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 11:37:00 PM
Frod, I see your point but what ever possessed these people to participate in sharing sensitive information on a listserve in the first place?  I mean, no listserve is 100% secure.  Second, none of this would be an issue if Carey had not been invited to join the LS.  Somebody made that decision and for better or for worse, that person and the other LS members have to deal with it.  Accusations that Carey was a mole from the git go don't hold much water without documentation (proof). Somewhere (this thread or another) you implied that nobody else knows what you know about this lady (Carey).  Well, perhaps you can enlighten the rest of us.  If not, then I trust you can understand why some of us prefer to reserve judgment until all the facts are on the table.  Which will probably be the 12th of Never.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 14, 2003, 11:38:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:28:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"
Quote
I understand what you're saying and there is a valid point in what you say, but he's a GREAT noisemaker and considering the informality of the forum I would think it's easily something everyone can live with. Not everyone can be a great wordsmith, and he is thought provoking (in a very good way).

Thanks, anon...whoever you are."


THAT'S OK FRODERIK. JUST PAYING-OFF AN OLD DEBT.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 11:44:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 19:55:00, Froderik13 wrote:

why is Carey innocent



I think we're looking at this whole thing in very different ways. You seem to be looking for the guilty parties to punish and innocent parties to love and protect.

I think none of us are innocent, most are forgivable and even more of us are understandable.

If we can shed some light on how the whole scam works and how everybody loses, then people won't be so easily taken in by it. That's my whole aim.

Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose, and you allow him to make war at pleasure. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after having given him so much as you propose. If today he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him,--"I see no probability of the British invading us"; but he will say to you, "Be silent: I see it, if you don't."
--Abraham Lincoln

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 14, 2003, 11:49:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:31:00, Froderik13 wrote:

Not trying to bail on you here Ginger, but I've got to sign off...'night..

Me too. Long day today.

Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:31:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"Ask not for which you shall never need not brought to the forefront of the pretentious misgivings due to the fact that the flyin rollin doughnut just passed not either in front nor afterwards behind the front end.

"


ROFLMAO!!

If only there were evil people somewhere, insidiously committing evil
deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: GregFL on December 15, 2003, 12:04:00 AM
Quote
On 2003-12-14 20:44:00, Antigen wrote:

"
Quote

On 2003-12-14 19:55:00, Froderik13 wrote:


why is Carey innocent


I think we're looking at this whole thing in very different ways. You seem to be looking for the guilty parties to punish and innocent parties to love and protect.

I think none of us are innocent, most are forgivable and even more of us are understandable.


BINGO!

The government is much more interested in preserving the purity of its ideology than it is in allowing patients to get effective medicine.
-- Ethan B. Russo, neurologist at Western Montana Clinic

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Deborah on December 15, 2003, 12:04:00 AM
But what about what she gave them?*********

That is the million dollar question Frod. Does anyone REALLY know 'what she gave them'? Do you really know?
What was on her hard-drive that PURE does not want WWASP to have?
What good or harm will it do?
Can WWASP actually use that information?
What might she have deleted before she sent her hard drive?

No one but Carey knows the answer to these questions.
I share your frustration with Carey's avoidance of direct questions, but that doesn't make her the bitch from hell, yet. There may be a reason for her avoidance. Who knows? Time MIGHT tell. Will any of us ever know the whole truth of this saga? Doubtful.

Sometime when you're bored, go back and read this forum around May I think it was, hell might have been Aug. It was extremely frustrating. I finally stopped trying to make sense of it or draw any rational conclusions because day after day, the two opposing sides hurled stones at one another and spoke about issues that we (the public) couldn't follow. It's like an arguement from another forum transplanted itself here one day and all anyone could do was observe, cause they certainly couldn't participate.

You just happened to catch another wave of the ongoing public feud. I really wish Ginger had given them their own forum. (hint, hint) And I hope you'll consider eliminating or consolodating some of the numerous threads you started on Carey. Hey, notice that I'm not telling you what to do. It is a request- in consideration of parents/others who might come here looking for useful information on the industry and have to muddled through too many off-color (but some humerous!) posts.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 09:22:00 AM
Quote
nobody else knows what you know about this lady (Carey). Well, perhaps you can enlighten the rest of us. If not, then I trust you can understand why some of us prefer to reserve judgment until all the facts are on the table. Which will probably be the 12th of Never.

Clarification: Please take care to read what I write. Not trying to get pissy with you here, but it could save us a little time in the future. I ain't that wordy, so you can surely digest my posts pretty easily. Anyway, I said that nobody KNOWS HER like I do. Not: nobody else knows what I KNOW ABOUT HER. In other words, nobody else was there when that (censored) pissed me off enough to go ahead and start threads like "Carey's Rectum Probed" etc...
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 09:30:00 AM
Quote
I think we're looking at this whole thing in very different ways. You seem to be looking for the guilty parties to punish and innocent parties to love and protect.

I think none of us are innocent, most are forgivable and even more of us are understandable.

If we can shed some light on how the whole scam works and how everybody loses, then people won't be so easily taken in by it. That's my whole aim.

Well good! That's admirable. I'm not looking to punish anyone, though I must admit that I wouldn't mind taking a strap to Carey's backside and see if she still behaves like such a tar-baby!  :rofl: No, we're all guilty. Guilty as sin. But what about calling a spade a spade, or a snitch a snitch? I know that we're talking in circles here, and it looks like we may just have to agree to disagree. Fine by me. BTW, I like the Jerry quote,
or Dave Mason quote or whatever...

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-15 07:15 ]
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 10:15:00 AM
::hehehmm::
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 10:32:00 AM
Deb,

Dont you have the same things on your hard drive? Aren't you involved with pure?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 11:59:00 AM
Quote
Anyway, I said that nobody KNOWS HER like I do.


Frog, when did we ever meet?  How do you know me so well?  At one point you claim to not be involved with any of this.  You were not with Trekers or PURE and had no personal involvment.  Now you know me so well, you claim, how.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Carey on December 15, 2003, 12:00:00 PM
that was me Frog.  If you start up with your fowl mouth, don't expect me to respond to your comments.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 12:18:00 PM
Quote
Frog, when did we ever meet? How do you know me so well? At one point you claim to not be involved with any of this. You were not with Trekers or PURE and had no personal involvment. Now you know me so well, you claim, how.


I said that nobody KNOWS HER like I do. Not: nobody else knows what I KNOW ABOUT HER...

In other words, I was saying that noone else knew how frustrating it can be to try to converse with you, not that I had any "inside info." Do you understand?

That's all I meant by that comment. Sorry for the confusion.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 01:53:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-15 06:22:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"
Quote
nobody else knows what you know about this lady (Carey). Well, perhaps you can enlighten the rest of us. If not, then I trust you can understand why some of us prefer to reserve judgment until all the facts are on the table. Which will probably be the 12th of Never.

Clarification: Please take care to read what I write. Not trying to get pissy with you here, but it could save us a little time in the future. I ain't that wordy, so you can surely digest my posts pretty easily. Anyway, I said that nobody KNOWS HER like I do. Not: nobody else knows what I KNOW ABOUT HER. In other words, nobody else was there when that (censored) pissed me off enough to go ahead and start threads like "Carey's Rectum Probed" etc...

"


Alex, nothing excuses these foul mouthed, extended flame wars. You obviously know nothing about this woman, and are just burying yourself in a hole. You really need to let this go.

Bumping this thread? How utterly obnoxious!
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 01:57:00 PM
Oh, i see you FINALLY figured out how to edit without it show...
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 01:58:00 PM
ing.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 02:08:00 PM
I know, I'm a bastard, ain't I? And, I killed three birds:

1. I offended you, which I've been waiting to do.
2. I created a link to the post by anon, which I liked.
3. I bumped up the thread.

I apologize for #3. I promise not to do it again, unless someone posts on that thread.

Whatta ya know?
A pig in a plain brown wrapper
He wanna bring me down
I'll hit that corna
Lemme just warn ya
I'll bring ya ass down
make ya family mourn ya
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 15, 2003, 02:58:00 PM
Frod, correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe you've got some info I don't and some good reason for keeping it to yourself. But it seems to me that you don't really know Carey at all. All you have is what you've been told by people you trust(ed?). And so you believed it.

I don't know Carey all that well either. From what little I do know, I like that gal. Like everyone else on the planet, myself included, she's somtimes wrong about things. But I haven't seen any evidence at all of all these claims about her by anon posters. What I have seen in evidence is that she's got something to say that some other people don't want said and that these other people have shown their asses BIG time in an attempt to discredit her before anyone can find out her side of the story.

The most ironic thing about this whole bruhaha? The big smoking gun indictment is that Carey is a snitch! Well, what's a snitch? Depends on who you ask. Meriam Webster says a snitch is a tattletale.

By that definition, aren't we all snitches then? Aren't we all trying hard to tattletale on the troubled parent industry?

No, some of us apparently are not. Some of us seem to only want to tattletale on one company within the industry and to keep secrets for the rest of the industry.

But there are other definitions of the term snitch. Most people interpret the 9th Commandment in the Old Testament to mean "don't lie, ever, for any reason". But that's not what it says. It says "Thou shalt not bear false witnes against thy neighbor." To me, that doesn't say that we're supposed to go around telling everybody everything we know or think or feel. It says don't be a dirty, lying, vengefull snitch. Don't go around making shit up in order to get other people into trouble.

So... who are the big snitches around here? And why are they so paranoid about telling anyone who they are? Just for clarification, I do NOT view this as a legitimate and worthy use of anon posting. I view it as an abuse and I expect that most intelligent, sane readers will probably figure that out and just not give them undue credibility.

If quitting drugs means joining the war on terrorism, does this portend the fire bombing of Amsterdamn ?

--Felton Manifestation

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 03:08:00 PM
Is Carey up to no good again?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 03:11:00 PM
Quote
Frod, correct me if I'm wrong. Maybe you've got some info I don't and some good reason for keeping it to yourself. But it seems to me that you don't really know Carey at all. All you have is what you've been told by people you trust(ed?). And so you believed it.

I never said that I know her. Who knows, if I were to meet her in person, I might even find that I don't hate her (I doubt it, though.) But something stinks about what she did (according to what I read on this board, etc..) and I'd like to know what really happened. I may never find out, but we'll see...Until then, I guess I'll have to keep putting up with these anons, and they'll have to keep putting up with me...

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-15 12:13 ]
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 03:24:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-15 11:08:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"I know, I'm a bastard, ain't I? And, I killed three birds:



1. I offended you, which I've been waiting to do.

2. I created a link to the post by anon, which I liked.

3. I bumped up the thread.



I apologize for #3. I promise not to do it again, unless someone posts on that thread.



Whatta ya know?

A pig in a plain brown wrapper

He wanna bring me down

I'll hit that corna

Lemme just warn ya

I'll bring ya ass down

make ya family mourn ya"


Frod, I thought you wanted out of the "carey-sucks-club"?  What are you, a liar?  Yeah, that must be it.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 03:30:00 PM
Scary Carey?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 03:32:00 PM
Quote
Frod, I thought you wanted out of the "carey-sucks-club"? What are you, a liar? Yeah, that must be it

No, just changed my mind...care for a cup of tea?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 03:41:00 PM
That was me...and please trim the whitespace out of your quotes, if you don't mind, sir/ma'am...
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:02:00 PM
Quote
On 2003-12-15 12:32:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote
Frod, I thought you wanted out of the "carey-sucks-club"? What are you, a liar? Yeah, that must be it

No, just changed my mind...care for a cup of tea?"


To go with your bologna sandwich?  No thanks. But lemme know what time you go to bed, I always feel better (and safer) knowing you are catching some z's instead of playing with matches, you flamer, you.  But seriously Frog, this is just dumb.  Why not pick on PURE or somebody else.  Do some digging, I'm sure you'll come up with something at least as interesting as this b.s.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 04:06:00 PM
Ok Carey..I know it's you because you always call me "Frog."
No tea? How about some lemonade?  :lol:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:11:00 PM
You'll have to offer her $$$$
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:14:00 PM
Or just tell her you'll use a subpoena, but that might cost $100,000
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:17:00 PM
Ah Hah!!! You DO jump to conclusions, Frog.  It wasn't the object of your obession (Poor Carey) who posted that message a 'tall.  Just another ANON who knows a RED HERRING when they see one, though why anyone would take you seriously on any subject, is beyond me.  You make no sense.  You just blather on and on and on, sounding like the bull(ie)frog you clearly are.   :wstupid:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 04:23:00 PM
So far, she was the only one to call me "Frog." I make sense, asshole. One hell of a lot of sense...how about a cup of tea?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:32:00 PM
Quote from Frog:  "Im a chicken hawk"


Well, that a fact?  This term  means either

1) Someone who advocates war who once avoided military service, usually a politician.

or

2)an older homosexual that lusts after young boys.


Which definition do you prefer be applied to you?


As a public service, so you don't make a bigger ass out of yourself, here is one of the many things you are guilty of

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacie ... rring.html (http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html)

In fact, your homework, little boy, is to read this in its entirety.

http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/ske ... ments.html (http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/skeptic/arguments.html)

That way, one day when you grow up, you may find yourself welcome in a forum of adults.

Now, run along and grow up. The adults are trying to talk about serious issues over here, and if you insult the adults anymore, you may get sent to your room, a spanking, and no ice cream.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:34:00 PM
I see you deleted that post Frog...can't say that I blame you.



 :lol:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 04:50:00 PM
only seeing you post childish rap lyrics and then deleting them when you realize what you did.


Your a funny guy! :grin:  :lol:  :lol:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 15, 2003, 04:56:00 PM
Please don't take this the wrong way, Frog. It's offered in the spirit of friendship and mutual edification.

You liked the fallacy deconstruction page? Cool! I love it. I always use it whenever I find myself at a loss in debate just saying "but... but... that doesn't add up!" cause I can go down the list and identify the litterary term to describe the slight of mind. Here's the link, in case anyone wants it. http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ (http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/)

Quote
On 2003-12-15 13:23:00, Froderik13 wrote:

"So far, she was the only one to call me "Frog." I make sense, asshole. One hell of a lot of sense...how about a cup of tea?"


I'd peg that as confusing cause and effect.

  1. A and B regularly occur together.
  2. Therefore A is the cause of B.

When Carey posts, she often calls you Frog. That is true enough. But somone calling you Frog does not necessarily mean Carey is the one posting. Someone else might take on the term. I only used it above to illustrate the point. I'd rather call you Frod. Despite all that's gone on around here lately, I don't hate you. Certainly, you can be an asshole. So can I, so can I!  ::noway:: But that's not all there is to you.

If you think yourself too wise to involve
yourself in government, you will be governed
by those too foolish to govern.  
--Plato

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 05:27:00 PM
It may not be all there is to him, but lately, it has been the prevelant part of him.

Froderick, what is your purpose? Are you here to learn? To teach? To participate in a postive thing?

Or are you here to insult and degrade people?  Your choice. But you should know, the opinion people hold of you is slipping by the minute.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 05:37:00 PM
Ginger: It was an educated GUESS. In my mind I wasn't 100% SURE that it was Carey, but I went out on a limb anyway...
This is interesting, but I don't really see that there's that much of a point to it..

Anon: Did you see my posts that with the subtopic "Hotel Californits'?" Maybe not...I keep trying to check out, but I can't seem to leave...

[ This Message was edited by: Froderik13 on 2003-12-15 14:39 ]
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 15, 2003, 06:31:00 PM
"The jawbone of an ass is just as dangerous a weapon today as in Sampson's time."
--- Richard Nixon
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Froderik on December 15, 2003, 10:15:00 PM
Sex is dirty only when it's done right.
---Woody Allen

Reality is what refuses to go away when I stop believing in it.
---Philip K. Dick
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Deborah on December 16, 2003, 12:19:00 AM
Deb,
Dont you have the same things on your hard drive? Aren't you involved with pure?
************

Dream on sweetie.  Are you confused or just trying to confuse the readers here by planting a seed of doubt? Whatever possessed you?
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Antigen on December 16, 2003, 12:45:00 AM
Deb, that's a valid question, so long as you don't read any more into it than what's there.

Fact is, everyone who was subscribed to that list got a copy of every message sent to it for the duration of their subscription. Not only that, but if their ISP stores mail and keeps archived backups, then there are copies in all of those places, too.

The way I read the question was "Well, does that mean everybody's selling listmail to WWASP?" To which the obvious answer is "No".

Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following
pages, are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them
general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong,
gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises
at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom.  But the
tumult soon subsides.  Time makes more converts than reason.
Thomas Paine, Common Sense

Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Deborah on December 16, 2003, 07:57:00 AM
Fact is, everyone who was subscribed to that list got a copy of every message sent to it for the duration of their subscription.
***********

I read it as another Red Herring being toss out. I have never been subscribed to that list, nor do I have any affiliation with pure or trekkers. And, I doubt that there's anything on my hard drive that WWASP would be interested in.
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 16, 2003, 09:37:00 AM
Bullshit.  :grin:
Title: WHO THE HECK MODERATES THIS BLATHER?
Post by: Anonymous on December 16, 2003, 10:11:00 AM
Double Bull!!