Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => The Troubled Teen Industry => Topic started by: Antigen on November 30, 2003, 01:57:00 PM
-
Here's their contact form:
http://www.ticotimes.net/contact_us.htm (http://www.ticotimes.net/contact_us.htm)
November 28, 2003
Dundee Case Still Worries U.S. Parents
By Tim Rogers
Tico Times Staff
SIX months after the closure of Dundee Ranch Academy, tough-love program owner Narvin Lichfield of Utah once again is a free man.
The restrictions on his freedom, imposed by a Costa Rican judge May 23 following Lichfieldâ??s brief arrest on allegations of childrenâ??s rights abuse, expired last Sunday and prosecutor Marielos Alfaro said she doesnâ??t see a need to request a six-month extension of his prohibition on leaving the country.
Lichfield, who is currently enrolled in Spanish classes as he plans to reopen his academy under a different name and a gentler, therapeutic model, insists he is not going to leave the country to avoid the on-going investigation.
"I am still confused what I was arrested for in the first place," Lichfield said with a laugh, adding that the truth soon will absolve him of abuse charges.
"The truth is the most important thing. Was it true that kids were abused? I admit, there were a lot of things that happened [at Dundee] that I didnâ??t know about, but I donâ??t think there really was [abuse]," Lichfield told The Tico Times this week.
MEANWHILE, a growing number of parents of former academy students in the United States are expressing concern that the investigation here into what happened at Dundee has been shelved, and that charges will not be pressed against Lichfield.
Distanced by a couple thousand miles, an unfamiliar judicial system and a language barrier, some of the U.S. parents say they are feeling powerless.
For several months, a group of 12 former Dundee students has been prepared to return to Costa Rica to testify to allegations of physical and emotional mistreatment suffered at the hands of former Dundee staff.
But no court date has been set by the prosecutor or the judge, and the parents are hesitant to fly their children down unannounced.
"I am concerned that when parents have tried to call the prosecutorâ??s office, they are told â??No English!â?? and hung up on," said Karen Burnett, mother of a former Dundee student.
Prosecutor Alfaro admits that no one in her office speaks English, but said that former students can come down to Costa Rica anytime to give their testimony. They will be received with "no problem," she said.
LOCATED on the remote grounds of a former eco-hotel about 15 kilometers from the Pacific-slope community of Orotina, Dundee Ranch Academy was an affiliate of the Utah-based WorldWide Association of Specialty Programs (WWASP). The non-therapeutic behavior-modification facility, home to 200 troubled teenagers mostly from the United States, was operated under the philosophy of "identify your incorrect behavior, and stop doing it," according to Lichfield.
But some of the methods Dundee staff members used to help wayward teens identify their "incorrect behavior" -- including solitary confinement, physical restraint and allegations of drug-induced sedation -- were blasted by critics as abusive (TT, Oct. 25, 2002; Jan. 17, March 14).
Last May, the mother of one Dundee student filed a complaint with the Atenas Prosecutorâ??s Office, where Prosecutor Fernando Vargas was substituting for the regular prosecutor who was on vacation. Vargas immediately asked Judge Gabriela SaborÃo to authorize a government intervention of Dundee.
The interventions, which occurred on May 20 and 22, spiraled out of control when Vargas tried to explain to the children their rights under Costa Rican law. Several dozen youth escaped from the campus, while others rioted and vandalized the facility.
Lichfield was detained for 24 hours before being released on conditional freedoms. He closed the academy May 24 and the students were whisked back to their parents in the United States or to other WWASP programs in the United States and Jamaica (TT, May 23, May 30).
THE Ombudsmanâ??s Office blasted the Child Welfare Agencyâ??s handling of the situation as "permissive and tolerant" of alleged abuse, and recommended that child welfare authorities develop new protocol for situations where children are at high risk (TT, Sept. 12).
Prosecutor Fernando Vargas, who was removed from Dundee case a week after the May raids when prosecutor Marielos Alfaro returned from vacation, also is raising a critical voice against Costa Ricaâ??s handling of the case.
In July, he filed a complaint with the Internal Judicial Inspectorâ??s Office against Judge SaborÃo, who he claims interfered with his ability to gather necessary evidence during the interventions, and acted inappropriately in a situation where children were asking for help.
SaborÃo denies any wrongdoing, but said she could not comment further because she is the subject of an ongoing internal investigation.
VARGAS also is critical of the current prosecutorâ??s handling of the case, which he claims is "passive" and not being conducted with the importance that it deserves. He claims he did more to advance the investigation in the week following the raid, than anything that has been done in the last six months.
Alfaro told The Tico Times that the investigation is still open, and denied it is not being given its due importance. She said her office is still waiting for confiscated documents to be translated into Spanish, as well as other proof from the Judicial Investigative Police (OIJ).
Alfaro explained that she is the only prosecutor in Atenas and is handling about 500 ongoing cases, many older than the Dundee case. She stressed that all cases are given equal importance, and that the Dundee matter will be resolved in due time.
Vargas argues the case would be moved along faster if there was more public and media pressure. He blames the relatively mild public reaction to the Dundee situation on a general perception that the issue is a "gringo problem."
If the students had been Costa Ricans, the publicâ??s reaction and the prosecutionâ??s handling of case would be much different, Vargas charged.
"There is a perception that these problems were brought here; that they are not ours," Vargas said. "And there is resentment: why do we have to deal with it when the U.S. knew about [WWASP] for years?"
WWASP, which currently has 10-affiliated programs in the United States and abroad, has operated in the U.S. for more than a decade. Dundee was the fourth WWASP program to close after being investigated for rights violations.
Earlier this month, U.S. congressman George Miller wrote to U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft and requested a federal probe of WWASP (TT, Nov. 7). Millerâ??s office has not yet received a reply, according to a congressional aid.
ALFARO vigorously denied the nationality of the alleged victims has anything to do with the prosecutionâ??s handling of the case.
"Whether they are gringos, Nicas or whoever, the law applies to all cases and each is given equal importance," she said.
Vargas claims the Dundee case is one of the most important in the country, and that Costa Rica, with its moral authority and progressive laws to protect childrenâ??s rights, is the perfect venue to put WWASP on trial.
"If Dundee falls in Costa Rica, then WWASP falls in the rest of the world, but if Dundee doesnâ??t fall, WWASP will only get stronger," Vargas said.
LICHFIELD, meanwhile, said that in the last six months he has injected $600,000 into his new academy, which he hopes to open by Jan. 1 on the same Orotina campus. He said the new academy will not be affiliated with WWASP because of the "negative attached to it."
Lichfield said he will be a consultant to the new academy, and will not be part of the ownership group, which will headed by former director Francisco Bustos and new director Herald Dabel, a Spanish professor from South Carolina.
The controversial "High Impact" boot-camp compound that Lichfield was building on the Dundee campus has since been converted into a recreational center with a weight room and movie theater, Lichfield said.
CHILD Welfare Minister RosalÃa Gil has told The Tico Times she will not allow Dundee to reopen here.
Lichfield, however, said he will use the $2 million in estimated damages to Dundee as leverage to convince authorities to allow him to reopen an appropriate facility that the "Costa Rican government is comfortable with."
Lichfield, who said he donated $10,000 to campaign of President Abel Pacheco, claims he has appealed to the President for help, but added Pacheco probably "doesnâ??t want to touch us with a 10-foot poll."
For now, Lichfield wants to put the past behind him and "get back to what we do, and thatâ??s help kids."
What a distressing contrast there is between the radiant intelligence of the child and the feeble mentality of the average adult.
-- Sigmund Freud
-
"He said the new academy will not be affiliated with WWASP"
Who is Narvin's brother???
-
He also said, "that in the last six months he has injected $600,000 into his new academy, which he hopes to open by Jan. 1" and "he will be a consultant to the new academy, and will not be part of the ownership group, which will headed by former director Francisco Bustos and new director Herald Dabel, a Spanish professor from South Carolina."
Hmmm, he doesn't "own" it but he put 600K clams into it? Anyone else questioning that?
If he's not the/an "owner", why is he investing HIS money, and why is HE planning to reopen the facility?
-
OMG...WWASP made the Tico Time's political cartoon for this week: http://www.ticotimes.net/cartoon.htm (http://www.ticotimes.net/cartoon.htm)
-
Check it out,
RYAN FRAIDENBURGH TALKS ABOUT HIS EXPERIENCE ON NATIONAL TV:
21c (CTV, Canada) | INSIDE EDITION (syndicated US)
http://coldwaterthemovie.com/movie.html (http://coldwaterthemovie.com/movie.html)
When did these air?for nothing can keep it right but their own vigilant and distrustful superintendence.
--Thomas Jefferson
-
Litchfield says,"He said the new academy will not be affiliated with WWASP because of the "negative attached to it."
That's funny! WWASP is not the negative in this camp! WWASP doesn't want Dundee (or whatever it will be) affiliated with them!
-
Bullshit!
WWASP pretends Dundee is the problem, Dundee pretends WWASP is the problem and, with a wink and a nod, the TOUGHLOVE hategroup goes on recruiting, with the full blessing and support of our law enforcement, regulators and juvenile justice agencies.
C'Mon, people! It's not asif we haven't seen this song and dance before. I tried for years to live according to everyone else's morality.
I tried to live like everyone else, to be like everyone else.
I said the right things even when I felt and thought quite differently.
And the result is a catastrophe.
---Albert Camus
-
Look at this:
http://www.dundeeranch.org/ (http://www.dundeeranch.org/)
Dundee shut down how many months ago, and there's no mention of the fact on their site. If you click the "Or Please fill out the following form" link at the foot of the page, it takes you to.... none other than
https://data.teenhelp.us/index.php?domain_ref=sft.com (https://data.teenhelp.us/index.php?domain_ref=sft.com)
teenhelp.us shows lich@infowest.com
as an admin, tech, organization and billing contact. What a wonderfully multitalented guy good ol'e Lich is, eh?
sft.com belongs to an organization called SFT Investments Ltd. w/ offices on Dixie Highway in Oakland Park, FL and on Grand Cayman Island.
Interesting shit, huh? Should we keep an eye out for another re-enactment in the Caymans? Or is that just where they're hiding some money? And where do you think teenhelp is sending referals from the DRA ad?
Do you support drug prohibition because it finances criminals at home or because it finances terrorists abroad?
--Anonymous
-
As long as parents are not held accountable AND as long as parents are willing to pay the big bucks the programs will never go away.
-
his lawyer (http://www.shearman.com/lawyers/counsel/gerasimovich.html) ...
"SFT Asset Holding Inc., an affiliate of CITCO Corporate Services Inc., in its sale of First National Bank of Aruba to The Royal Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Limited."
So then Citgo is somehow invested in the troubled parent fleecing industry?
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... miamithem' (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/040303082X/circlofmiamithem') target='_new'>H. G. Wells
-
On 2003-12-01 18:18:00, Anonymous wrote:
"As long as parents are not held accountable AND as long as parents are willing to pay the big bucks the programs will never go away. "
No, you don't get it. No parent ever escapes accountability. None. Not one. Even those who come to their senses and make every honorable effort to patch things up with their kids. They will never, ever, ever errase the harm done to their own children, grandchildren and extended families by this betrayal.
Now, if we can get a good many of them to shake it off in time to file before the statute of limitations expires, we might make some serious legal headway and save their families some heartache. If we can't, then there's really no sense indicting and punishing them. That only feeds the cult martyrdome complex.
What we need to do is get the story out to the relatively sane members of our society so that they understand what really goes on behind euphemisms like "Teen Help" and "Behavior Growth School".
"Distrust all in whom the impulse to punish is powerful."--Friedrich Nietzsche
Our youth can not understand why society chooses to criminalize a behavior with so little visible ill effect or adverse social impact... These young people have jumped the fence and found no cliff.
Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse
-
No, you don't get it.
No, I do get it. Make parents accountable today and that will be a deterrent for other parents tomorrow.n If they see that they can lose their freedoms based on their bad choices other parents will want proof positive that their child is OK.
-
I fail to see how you would go about making parents accountable for their bad choices. It seems like a moot arguement.
My guess is that the majority of CPS workers and law enforcement, judges, etc support the private warehousing industry for "troubled" teens, at the parent's expense. They perceive the parent as acting "responsibly".
Who is going to take action against a parent for their "bad choices" except another parent or family member or close friend? And for what specifically? Abuse? You first must prove that abuse is happening. That is no easy matter given the nature of the beast, particularly when the abuse is psychological.
-
On 2003-12-01 19:59:00, Anonymous wrote:
"No, you don't get it.
No, I do get it. Make parents accountable today and that will be a deterrent for other parents tomorrow.n If they see that they can lose their freedoms based on their bad choices other parents will want proof positive that their child is OK."
Make them accountable? You mean by law? That would be like making water run downhill by law. It's redundant. And Deborah's right. State and county juvenile justice and CPS systems send a good many kids to these gulags. They're not about to start holding parents to account for what they do themselves.
Besides, as I said, by putting their kids in these programs, they are already destroying their own family and their tie to the future. Parents who tend to think ahead have already noticed the effects. Parents who don't think ahead aren't going to be deterred. The programs will just spin it as proof of the martyrdome of parents. They already have a firm foundation to build on. It's already the states' fault the kids are so messed up because parents aren't allowed to discipline them.
Going after the parents would further divde fmilies and probably not effect the industry at all. Might even lead to the current cast of The Supremes codifying the parents' right to abuse by proxy.
Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will [America's] heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.
--John Quincy Adams, Speech to the U.S. House of Representatives [July 4, 1821]
_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
10/80 - 10/82
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
Anonymity Anonymous
-
If you want to shut down the industry, then shut down the demand for it. Hold parents accountable. It is their job as a parent to protect their children from exploitation. The parents are not victims, they are perps, they are playing GOD, judge and jury, with their childrens lives, they are part of the problem.
-
How? How do propose to shut down the industry by holding parents accountable? Who is going to take that action, when the majority of people in this society condone the industry? Specific suggestions? Or fantasitical thinking?
Society says a good parent IS god, judge, jury unless they blatantly abuse their child. Then CPS or a guardian ad litem becomes god, judge, jury over the minor.
It has not been established among the masses that there is a "problem" which parents are/ may be contributing to.
If you're suggesting that rampant talking might deter reasonable parents and put a dent in the warehousing of teens industry, then yes. But that is not the same as "holding parents accountable".
-
Here's an idea! If all of us pay close attention to whatever passes in front of us and respond to any discussion of the teen gulag industry, then the recruiters will have a very difficult time recruiting. Their pitch really doesn't stand scrutiny. It workes entirely on irrational fear.
Here's an opportunity right here:
http://pub57.ezboard.com/fwevebeenthere ... 21&stop=29 (http://pub57.ezboard.com/fwevebeentherefrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=88.topic&start=21&stop=29)The graduate with a Science degree asks, "Why does it work?"
The graduate with an Engineering degree asks, "How does it work?"
The graduate with an Accounting degree asks, "How much will it cost?"
The graduate with a Liberal Arts degree asks, "Do you want fries with that?"
--Anonymous
-
Deborah it is all about supply and demand. If you don't hold accountable all of the players, then you have not accomplished anything.
Close a program today...another opens tomorrow. Why...because the parents who place their kids in these programs don't see see that they are part of the problem. They only see their kids as "the problem" and "the programs" as the solution.
-
Parents already commit crimes by sending their kids to be abused. Its called due diligence. The law is nearly impossible to enforce because the kids lack the right to even write a letter to a lawyer and ask for help.
What needs to be reformed are the rights of kids. No involuntary commitment without a fair hearing.
Free and unmonitored communication with a lawyer, parents, and anyone else while they are committed.
Mandatory Mininum of 5 years prison time for anyone who misrepresents an unlicensed "treatment" center as just a boarding school or any other common child care business such as a summer camp whether through advertising, referrals, or by lying on state licensing/registration documents.
Specific provisions should be included that make the owner/operator and/or all members of the board personally liable for criminal activity on the part of the facility and staff. That means if that program operators will closely monitor everything because it is their ass on the line.
Licensing for all programs, strict requirements, random inspections, instant termination of license power given to the inspectors. Inspectors should be able to instantly suspend the license of any program for 30 days and pull all the kids out. This power should be protected from all judicial injunctions until a hearing. That means no program owned judges can issue injunctions to keep the inspectors from shutting down an abusive program.
-
Why...because the parents who place their kids in these programs don't see see that they are part of the problem. They only see their kids as "the problem" and "the programs" as the solution.
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppression of both mind and body will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day"
--Thomas Jefferson
"If we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion by education."
--Thomas Jefferson
- A democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
- A republic is where the sheep get to pick which wolves vote on what to have for dinner.
- But in a constitutional republic, voting on dinner is strictly
forbidden.
--A Patriot