Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => The Troubled Teen Industry => Topic started by: Anonymous on September 27, 2009, 04:50:58 PM
-
Ken Huey has not been proven guilty in a court of law. He runs a legitimate program.
This is true.
-
Half true, anyway. Better than nuttin', I s'pose.
-
People on this website are bitter because Ken Huey is making more money than they are.
-
LoL! At least in this case you are very wrong.
People on this forum are looking forward to Ken Huey taking a loss.
-
lot's of dishonest and dishonorable people make money. That is the way of the world kiddies, get a clue.
money doesn't guarantee respectibility.
Also, just because Ken has tried to run a "legal" organiztion doesn't mean it's moral or legit. After all, the Nazi's ran a legit, legal, nationalistic program didn't they???
Most of them got hanged didn't they??? Still hunted today, right??? Justice boys and girls.
Ken is much the same...we all know.
CALO hasn't been charged with someting illegal... yet...but we haven't seen the whole story yet have we??? More to come.
Maybe breach of fiduciary responsibilty, maybe breach of contract, maybe all of the above and then some...maybe breach of being a human being.
Ken...Krap...Kalo....KKK. Kut, Klieve, Kosher.
CG
-
Ken Huey was not a a member of the National Socialist German Workers' party of Germany, which in 1933, under Adolf Hitler, seized political control of the country, suppressing all opposition and establishing a dictatorship over all cultural, economic, and political activities of the people, and promulgated belief in the supremacy of Hitler as Führer, aggressive anti-Semitism, the natural supremacy of the German people, and the establishment of Germany by superior force as a dominant world power.
Nice try with the Nazi comparison. Try again.
-
lot's of dishonest and dishonorable people make money. That is the way of the world kiddies, get a clue.
That is something that has been pointed out hundreds of times on this forum. Get a clue
Also, just because Ken has tried to run a "legal" organiztion doesn't mean it's moral or legit. After all, the Nazi's ran a legit, legal, nationalistic program didn't they???
Ken is much the same...we all know
Well, the Nazis (NOT Nazi's, but then who cares about punctuation and grammer; its just something taught in those left-wing liberal "schools" where they don't punish enough) tortured, experimented on and murdered people. You want Ken's butt because he failed in his fiduciary duty to give you your money's worth by not punishing and torturing enough. And you say they are same? :rofl:
-
KKK
Is Daniel Carver a therapist at CALO? :roflmao:
-
Ken...Krap...Kalo....KKK. Kut, Klieve, Kosher.
CG
If Ken Huey was a KKK member, wouldn't he be hanging black people and spreading hatred towards Jews.
-
Eh, who cares. I just want CALO shut down and out of business already.
-
Ken Huey was not a a member of the National Socialist German Workers' party of Germany, which in 1933, under Adolf Hitler, seized political control of the country, suppressing all opposition and establishing a dictatorship over all cultural, economic, and political activities of the people, and promulgated belief in the supremacy of Hitler as Führer, aggressive anti-Semitism, the natural supremacy of the German people, and the establishment of Germany by superior force as a dominant world power.
Nice try with the Nazi comparison. Try again.
It's called an analogy. Her point that legitimate/illegitimate and ethical/unethical does not equal legal/illegal.
-
There you have it. Ken Huey, according to disgruntled parents/teens, is http://www.chattershmatter.com/images/adolf_hitler.jpg (http://www.chattershmatter.com/images/adolf_hitler.jpg) .
-
Guest wrote "You want Ken's butt because he failed in his fiduciary duty to give you your money's worth by not punishing and torturing enough. And you say they are same"
So guest, as a paid CALO representative are you admitting to punishing and torturing those kids...or just not "enough"?
Please tell and drop me a line. I'd very much like to have a conversation with you.
CG
-
Guest wrote "You want Ken's butt because he failed in his fiduciary duty to give you your money's worth by not punishing and torturing enough. And you say they are same"
So guest, as a paid CALO representative are you admitting to punishing and torturing those kids...or just not "enough"?
Please tell and drop me a line. I'd very much like to have a conversation with you.
CG
Yes,
I am admitting to thttp://frontpage.americandaughter.com/ ... -grave.jpg (http://thttp://frontpage.americandaughter.com/wp-images/ukraine-mass-grave.jpg)
-
Guest wrote "You want Ken's butt because he failed in his fiduciary duty to give you your money's worth by not punishing and torturing enough. And you say they are same"
So guest, as a paid CALO representative are you admitting to punishing and torturing those kids...or just not "enough"?
Please tell and drop me a line. I'd very much like to have a conversation with you.
CG
Yes,
I am admitting to http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.a/6 ... 970c-500wi (http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c60bf53ef011571562930970c-500wi)
-
Hey all,
We know there are some legal issues with the posting of the anonymous letter that was written by the alleged former staff members of CALO. To those out there who wrote it, I support you and I know that portions of this letter is the absolute 100% truth.
But has anyone posted Ken's response to the letter. After all it went to a select group of parents and this is something that shouldn't be protected, right?
After all it was a response by CALOs CEO to people over 18.
So, if it is out there, can we see it?
CG
-
Hey all,
We know there are some legal issues with the posting of the anonymous letter that was written by the alleged former staff members of CALO. To those out there who wrote it, I support you and I know that portions of this letter is the absolute 100% truth.
But has anyone posted Ken's response to the letter. After all it went to a select group of parents and this is something that shouldn't be protected, right?
After all it was a response by CALOs CEO to people over 18.
So, if it is out there, can we see it?
CG
Your response has been sent to Ken Huey. Thanks for the information! :roflmao:
-
Your response was sent to Ken Huey is rapidly in danger of becoming a new meme.
guest: And then I told my dad to...
guest2: Your response was sent to Ken Huey
guest: Who the fuck is Ken Huey?
guest3: Any day now, any day now!
-
It would be funny if someone called Ken Huey and said "I have one thing to say brother [two second pause], cunt!"
-
Guest,
So who gives a rats ass what info has been sent to Ken. You have to disclose everything anyway in the courts, and that is where this is headed. You're a friggin genious, did you just figure that out? You must be one of the kiddie staff member poor white trailor trash paid 9.00/hr. I'll bet you absolutely love CALO because you now have a job that isn't seasonal because of the resort community you live in. Or you could be the waitor that served me in the local overpriced restaurant.
We are going to see it anyway fool. Thanks for the information that confirmed you're a mental midget.
So the question still stands, anyone got that response letter?
CG
-
Guest,
So who gives a rats ass what info has been sent to Ken. You have to disclose everything anyway in the courts, and that is where this is headed. You're a friggin genious, did you just figure that out? You must be one of the kiddie staff member poor white trailor trash paid 9.00/hr. I'll bet you absolutely love CALO because you now have a job that isn't seasonal because of the resort community you live in. Or you could be the waitor that served me in the local overpriced restaurant.
We are going to see it anyway fool. Thanks for the information that confirmed you're a mental midget.
So the question still stands, anyone got that response letter?
CG
Curious George,
You have anger management issues. :roflmao:
-
So the question still stands, anyone got that response letter?
I, for one, would sure love to see what is in that letter. Perhaps a Guest that has it might deign to post its contents?