Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => Straight, Inc. and Derivatives => Topic started by: Anonymous on June 10, 2009, 12:03:04 PM
-
Miller Newton's protege JERRY VAUSE touched my junk liberally. He strapped me in to his AARCmobile and he
couldnt keep his offensive hands off of me. He was performing many red flag touches. I couldnt believe what the fuck was going on. I told Miller Newton's protege JERRY VAUSE the city would not approve
of a millionaire touching an underage kid for free. Can you believe it? Miller Newton's protege JERRY VAUSE did all this. He picked me off the street, strapped my arms and legs down in the AARCmobile's passenger seat, and just wouldn't stop fondling my cock'n'balls.
They definately were red flag touches. The goddamn referee he had in the back seat kept on
raising up this red flag every time he touched my junk but did "Dr." VAUSE care? NO WAY! He
just kept on doing it. I couldn't believe what the fuck was going on, indeed. I pleaded with Miller Newton's protege JERRY VAUSE but to no avail. I told him the city would not approve of such a wealthy man
touching an underage kid like me (at the time I was 13) without at least compensating me for the trauma and the use of my body as his own personal plaything.
This got to him, worrying about his image. he continued to fondle me, all the while ignoring
the referee's red flags. Then he drove the AARCmobile to my house and ejected the seat I was in! It was amazing. But surprisingly, after I woke up the next morning, my bank account had $193k (CANADIAN) in it!!! Can you believe it?
-
Your offensive...
You're either The Wiz or a close associate of his.
Considering the sexual assaults and BS that happens within AARC - I find this post to be tasteless and offensive...
Guest44431444
-
Spelling errors, vile sense of humor... written by a current or former staff member, no doubt.
-
Your offensive...
- I find this post to be tasteless and offensive...
Guest44431444
Thank you!
-
Ya know you read stories here about AARC and just when you having me believing the place is a cult and bad for kids you write a story like this. How can we believe the other stories.
I think that many of you just have it out for AARC and will write anything to discredit then. I just cant believe it now. Is there any way to tell the difference between the made up stories and the real accounts?
-
I am a former client of theirs - within the first 25 to go through the center.
I write about my experiences and can say that a lot of what has been said on this board is truth and some of it is complete useless dribble being spouted off by people who either have never been through AARC or have a vendetta against Kids / Kids of New Jersey / Straight, etc...
People who come on this board spouting off about just smoking a bowl - etc, that is absolutely of no value to this forum - it should be a place to constructively criticize the actions of AARC and derivatives of other Kids spin-offs.
The protests that are organized by the so called crusader for legalizing Marijuana are nothing short of laughable - it just seems so hypocritical for a pot-head to be protesting a treatment center when he obviously can't come to terms with his own life issues.
If there are so called graduates of AARC and people who never really struggled with addiction but were forced to attend the center, then those people should be able to conduct themselves in such a way that there can be some insightful posts so that both sides are presented.
Enjoy the day!
Guest44431444
-
- it just seems so hypocritical for a pot-head to be protesting a treatment center when he obviously can't come to terms with his own life issues.
Guest44431444
What a fucking idiot AARC cocksucker you are, you brainwashed shit-for-brains-with-his-head-up-his-ass (where it shares an apartment with Vause's dick). Equating the use of, and advocacy of, marijuana with "inability to come to terms with life issues" just shows how fucking retarded you either are or were made by AARC.
Marijuana is a positive, benificent friend to those that use it. Only ignorant assholes like yourself equate smoking weed with having a "drug problem". Your attitude toward marijuana and those who use it is indicative of the fact that you are not only clueless about marijuana, its effects, and users, but also that you are still swilling AARC-brand (it was called Straight or KIDS in the USA) Kool-Aid.
Fuck off and die so I can grow some sensimilla on your grave so that you will at least be useful for something.
-
Well first - AARC cocksucker, I am not - I am actually banned from there, so next...
As for the "benefits" to using Marijuana - medicinally, sure, I can see that - I have a friend who uses it for MS, do I agree, no but it's not my place to judge.
As for the rest of your post, it's just mindless bantering that I expect from a base head that probably should have spent more time focusing on themselves rather than others.
You should also go back to school to expand your vocabulary a little deeper than it appears to be.
Good luck with your (useless) life...
Guest44431444
-
Well first - AARC cocksucker, I am not - I am actually banned from there, so next...
As for the "benefits" to using Marijuana - medicinally, sure, I can see that - I have a friend who uses it for MS, do I agree, no but it's not my place to judge.
As for the rest of your post, it's just mindless bantering that I expect from a base head that probably should have spent more time focusing on themselves rather than others.
You should also go back to school to expand your vocabulary a little deeper than it appears to be.
Good luck with your (useless) life...
Guest44431444
Again, you prove your idiotic mindset. Go back to sucking AARC cock...........
-
As for the rest of your post, it's just mindless bantering that I expect from a base head that probably should have spent more time focusing on themselves rather than others.
Guest44431444
Damn, I almost agreed with ya until I read this part of your post. You are babbling Cultspeak out of your ass..............the guy comes on and is pro-pot, so you immediately call him a base head...........you are obviously still in the grip of AARC, even if you "aren't allowed there" anymore.
Get some help, some counseling, or something to help you deal with the serious emotional injuries inflicted upon you by AARC and Vause.
Oh, yeah, you should also START SMOKING MARIJUANA (although I realize this is going to be difficult with Vause's dick in your mouth).
-
I'd debate with either of you but it's obvious you both are about as clueless as they come.
The original intent of this post and why I responded was the absolute disgusting tone in which the OP started this thread.
I probably should have kept my nose out of it but I could not - still one of my many character defects.
Guest44431444
-
Well, I think the OP really throws into question the validity of all the other posts about AARC. Obviously the original post was fabricated like some kid who failed biology class and wanted to get back at his teacher by making up some story about him to make himself feel better that he didn’t apply himself, it was disgusting. It fucking pisses me off because I thought all the shit I was reading about AARC was real but it may be all written by just one person trying to smear their name.
What are we all suppose to believe now?
-
Miller Newton's protege JERRY VAUSE touched my junk liberally. He strapped me in to his AARCmobile and he
couldnt keep his offensive hands off of me.
Thank you AARC supporter for slandering your role model on a public forum. If we're ever served papers for a defamation suit ( :roflmao: ), we'll make sure you're included as well.
:agree:
How many times are you going to bring up your friend who accused his teacher of molestation to 'get back at him'? You know, ever since the AARC gala was protested, it seems like a particular AARC supporter(s) has been copying and pasting relentlessly on fornits. I'm not quite sure why - maybe to drive people away from fornits. Or maybe to help us prove how maladjusted AARC supporters are, being that they would spend their entire waking moments copying and pasting posts on a forum in order to dissuade people from learning the truth about your cult. Here's a tip... if you must copy and paste something for all eternity, try to make it something that will actually open people's eyes and make them see your point of view. (Your 'friend' who tried to get back at his teacher doesn't do that for me at all.)
And in case you're wondering why I find the idea of a defamation suit so amusing...
If someone sues for defamation, the most common defenses are:
Truth (known in law as "justification")
Absolute privilege
Qualified privilege
Fair comment
1. Truth or justification
A statement may hurt your reputation, but if it is true, anyone who says it has a valid defence if you sue them for defamation.
2. Absolute privilege
There are two main examples of this defence: statements made as evidence at a trial, and statements made in Parliament. This defence also allows the fair and accurate reporting of those statements in the media, such as newspaper reports of a trial. People must be able to speak freely in our justice and political systems without worrying about being sued.
3. Qualified privilege
Say a former employee of yours gave your name to an employer as a reference and that employer calls you for a reference. You say, "Well, frankly, I found that that employee caused morale problems." As long as you act in good faith and without malice, the defense of qualified privilege protects you if the former employee sues you for defamation. You gave your honest opinion and the caller had a legitimate interest in hearing it.
4. Fair comment
We all are free to comment – even harshly – about issues of public interest, as long as our comments are honest, based on fact, and not malicious. For example, a newspaper columnist may write that a Member of Parliament (an MP) says he supports equality and equal rights, but he opposes same-sex marriages. The columnist writes that the MP is hypocritical. If the MP sues the columnist for defamation, the columnist has the defence of fair comment.
From what I've seen, the only comments about AARC that have been slanderous and NOT based on fact have been, without a doubt, written by AARC affiliates/supporters. Good luck with that lawsuit. Just the thought of it makes me :roflmao:
-
I probably should have kept my nose out of it but I could not - still one of my many character defects.
Guest44431444
There ya go again, spouting the cultspeak.............
And you other guys.......quit all that talk about slander---you're making me scared that I'll have to spend all the AARC money that showed up in my bank account on a lawyer (that's Yankee for "barrister" or "soliciter", ya fucking Canuck AARC-loving jizz receptacle)
-
Ok, the "touched my junk" post has been over done. That is so 10yrs ago. Get a new one that is more interesting please.
Next, all that garbage about anti-pot smoking and base head and character defects is completely cultspeak. I agree w/ Guest. If you come in here using terms like that and want the long time posters to this forum to stand behind you or believe you have any validity at all - You are saddly mistaken. I suggest you read as much as you can about all the pieces people have put together here about the lineage of programs and how they all use specific language to brainwash you and your families. You are still spouting off that programed bullshit. Stop passing on the Cult gene please! It is like a contagious disease, and I don't want yours.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this cultspeaking poster the troll.
-
AARC & THE FIFTH ESTATE, WE GRADS STAND BY AARC AND DR. VAUSE!!!!
I've seen a number of people expressing their willingness to "die on the hill" for AARC. This is great, and much appreciated I'm sure. There are a few things you should remember while you're "going to war" for the good guys:
-Rambling off 110% undying support for ANYthing is not a good idea. It makes you look very stupid and it makes you an easy target for anyone who believes AARC is a cult. You can do more harm than good.
-You're being observed by people with ZERO familiarity with the program, people who don't know anything about addiction, people who believe addiction doesn't exist and people who believe in harm reduction. Therefore, if you aren't qualified to speak on a subject, don't. If you do not possess the proper information to conclude a debate in a successful fashion, do not get into the debate.
-Just because you're passionate and emotional, doesn't mean you need to carry the burden of defending something in an emotional manner. This never and will never work. Clear and concise thinking will always reward a person if their beliefs and values are being held to ridicule.
-AARC is not perfect, they know that and have made revisions to the program that reflect their willingness to change and/or evolve.
^This means that you're probably the only one saying that the organization can do no wrong. If you claim to be representing the program, you've just made a good lot of people look like a bunch of over-emotional occult idiots who lack intellect and the proper tact to address questions coming from the general public.
Basically, if you cannot back up your statements with fact and examples, I might suggest sitting out of any debates regarding AARC altogether. You may just end up giving more ammunition to the camp who wants AARC to close.
I've yet to see any of those people make a valid arguement when they've been forced to reconcile with someone who knows the program inside and out.. they usually resort to threats, ad-hominem attacks and lies.
Let them lie. Each and every one of you who's lives have changed for the better as a result of AARC is it's success story and there is no denying it.
There are more of us that support AARC than not. Lets think a little bit before we declare our undying love in an open forum.
-Josh
-
I'm going to go out on a limb here and call this cultspeaking poster the troll.
I am afraid you are mistaken with my affiliation with AARC - I am sure if you knew my name and went and approached The Wiz, he'd start spoutin' about the liar that I am and that I ran from the center twice and I did this and I did that - etc...
Ask Vause about the damage he alone did to the relationship with my father and I - he's proud of that and would talk proudly of it in the Parent Rap.
Please remember one thing here folks - I was one of the first 25 and I failed to stay. Upon my exit I was confronted in Rap and basically told that I would never be anything.
Ask Tammy, Jen or any of the EARLY AARC grads how well respected I was you'll get the full story - so troll, no - someone who wants the story told in a civil constructive way, yes.
I guess that's what maturity does, it allows you to state an opinion without having to resort to swearing or insinuating sexual acts.
Guest44431444
-
No question, Guest44431444 has really helped everyone who read his post. The level of maturity he brings by referring to someone about whom he has absolutely no knowledge as a "basehead" launched him into the stratosphere of decorum and sophistication. Likewise when he described the poster's life as useless. If there's one thing readers need here, it's another person telling them what they ought to do.
But this is the old AARColyte give-away:"If there are so called graduates of AARC and people who never really struggled with addiction but were forced to attend the center, then those people should be able to conduct themselves in such a way that there can be some insightful posts so that both sides are presented."
Funny AARColyte! Can't wait to see you, old pal. I'll have my cel phone.
-
I think it's really important that both sides of this issue are presented. That's why I post on this forum dedicated to Straight Inc. and it's derivatives. Straight Inc. was a criminal enterprise that used pseudoscientific quackery to defraud people and subjected the clients to an array of abuses and violations of both their basic human rights and their legal rights. AARC is equally pseudoscientific and based entirely in the violation of both the human and legal rights of the clients. AARC has, for various reasons, been favored with unquestioning portrayals in the media for many years. Many newspaper articles lauding AARC have been written, from Calgary to Toronto to Vancouver. In addition, numerous television programs have praised AARC. None of these media productions have ever presented the fact that AARC is simply a renamed version of this same pseudoscientific criminal enterprise that began as the Seed. But still, it's vitally important that I post here, in order that this forum does not unfairly present a negative image of a cult run by a lying fraud. I want the story told in a civil, constructive way, unlike say the Fith Estate program. So praise me everyone, for if not for me people might get the wrong idea about AARC.
Enjoy the day!
-
Boy - what I'd do to meet either of you face to face...
Good luck with all of your useless lives!
Enjoy the day!
-
Guest44431444(2)
Even though this forum contains the old AARCSurvivor posts, wherein people have been explaining for years that AARC takes in clients who are not suffering from the condition claimed by AARC, I thought I would demonstrate how clever I was by once again implying that there is some uncertainty as to whether this occurs. I'm so smart, I decided that I could simply ignore the fact that intakes at AARC are done by amateurs using the old Kids checklist. While ignoring that fact, I also thought that I would ignore the fact that Rachael presented evidence, in the form of a physician's statement that she was not suffering from an underlying substance abuse disorder upon entry to AARC, and that this evidence was seen on national television. I also thought I'd pretend that nobody was aware that falsely diagnosing clients has been a hallmark of all of these programs, making the possibility that it does not occurr at AARC so remote as to be inconceivable.
Not to mention the post, permanently affixed to the top of this section, in which Velvet describes her intake and her lack of addiction. I'm the smartest one in the bunch.
Enjoy the day.
-
I think it's really important that both sides of this issue are presented. That's why I post on this forum dedicated to Straight Inc. and it's derivatives. Straight Inc. was a criminal enterprise that used pseudoscientific quackery to defraud people and subjected the clients to an array of abuses and violations of both their basic human rights and their legal rights. AARC is equally pseudoscientific and based entirely in the violation of both the human and legal rights of the clients. AARC has, for various reasons, been favored with unquestioning portrayals in the media for many years. Many newspaper articles lauding AARC have been written, from Calgary to Toronto to Vancouver. In addition, numerous television programs have praised AARC. None of these media productions have ever presented the fact that AARC is simply a renamed version of this same pseudoscientific criminal enterprise that began as the Seed. But still, it's vitally important that I post here, in order that this forum does not unfairly present a negative image of a cult run by a lying fraud. I want the story told in a civil, constructive way, unlike say the Fith Estate program. So praise me everyone, for if not for me people might get the wrong idea about AARC.
Enjoy the day!
I dont agree with your entire post but you bring up some good points.... just because AARC is praised by local televison and media doesnt mean that they are flawless. This is not a good measurement. I think that since so many local businesses support them that they do deserve or earns them some level of credibility and one more...... I do agree that both side of the issue need to be reviewed and stated, but I dont see too much of that here unfortunately. There also seems to be a lot of focus on the employees of AARC and not the people who benifit (or not) from their time there.
-
It is vitally important that both sides of the issue need to be stated. Thankfully, I'm here to present the AARC side. This is true in any situation wherein all criminal acts. On one side, you have people who were falsely diagnosed as addicts by amateurs, and then subjected to a pseudoscientific program dreamed up forty years ago by a quack. On the other side, you have a cult leader syphoning hundreds of thousands of dollars from charities, the government and client families. As with any crime, it is vital that the perpetrators be able to continually cover up their actions. AARC just has open group, Calgary print and television media, and a group of corrupt politicians to perpetuate their version of the facts. That's why it is so important for me to ensure that this tiny voice is not drowned out by the powerful cabal of disgruntled clients posting in this web forum. Enjoy the day, and do what I tell you.
-
It is vitally important that both sides of the issue need to be stated. Thankfully, I'm here to present the AARC side. This is true in any situation wherein all criminal acts. On one side, you have people who were falsely diagnosed as addicts by amateurs, and then subjected to a pseudoscientific program dreamed up forty years ago by a quack. On the other side, you have a cult leader syphoning hundreds of thousands of dollars from charities, the government and client families. As with any crime, it is vital that the perpetrators be able to continually cover up their actions. AARC just has open group, Calgary print and television media, and a group of corrupt politicians to perpetuate their version of the facts. That's why it is so important for me to ensure that this tiny voice is not drowned out by the powerful cabal of disgruntled clients posting in this web forum. Enjoy the day, and do what I tell you.
I just love that took up a name after me - almost a way to honor me and I am flattered.
i guess why I have a differing opinion than most of you is that I chose to stay clean after I left AARC although my father stayed a corporate contributor and had his life royally screwed up and used to "cult-speak" me as well.
I love how people assume that I am just spouting "cult-speak" considering I never lasted more than 30 days either time.
Anyhow, enough with this bantering back and forth with a bunch of 16 year old's...
Enjoy the day!
Guest44431444
-
Although I was only in AARC less than 60 days, I felt that it was important for me to assert that there was some uncertainty about the unlawful nature of AARC in a forum dedicated to Straight and it's derivative programs like AARC. I'm so clever, i thought I'd use my special AARColyte mind trick by implying that the reason people are critical of me and AARC is because they chose not to stay clean. It's not my fault if you people can't appreciate my maturity.
-
Mr # 32 and Mr # 34..
Remember.. You are a newcommer here, just like you were there. There are consequences to that. You do not yet understand what happened to you, in time - you may come to understand this... and if you never do, you will pass on the cult gene to everyone you communicate with. You are but a lamb in a field of sheep. I plan to stay outside that fence, the world is a much bigger place out here. You are welcome to join us after you are able.
Enjoy your day. ( within the fence)