Fornits
Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform => The Troubled Teen Industry => Topic started by: Anonymous on August 10, 2003, 02:18:00 PM
-
There is a cancer growing within this small but tightly woven group of PURE supporters. You can't see it but it's there silently (and very aggressively) eating away at what little shred of credibility this group has left.
To those who believe they are fighting the "good fight", put down your arms for a minute and take a good look around.
The enemy is YOU.
:eek:
-
Yes, it appears this group and their self-serving agenda has done more harm than good as evident by the growing dissent within their own ranks. Who can blame them for not wanting to get further hurt when this house-of-cards finally collapses?
-
What you WWASP people don't get is that most people on this board do not give a shit about PURE. Some find the fact that they refer kids to other programs problematic; others say the work they are doing against WWASP outweighs that potential harm.
But most don't care either way.
They want to shut down WWASP and don't care who their allies are. the enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially.
-
To those who believe they are fighting the "good fight", put down your arms for a minute and take a good look around.
***********************************
When I take a look around, this is what I see:
WWASP's treatment of children is abusive.
The fact that PURE might be acting from purely selfish motives does not negate that fact.
Any means to that end, WWASP's closure, is "good".
PURE is in the business of refering parents to non-WWASP facilities for a fee.
Unfortunately, to date, that is not illegal.
Some or all of those facilities, may be equally, but covertly, as abusive.
Every facility is abusive if one considers being held against one's will without a court order, having contact with family severed, and isolated from the world to be abusive.
I personally have seen little, if any, intregrity exhibited by anyone associated with this industry.
They're all out to make a buck off desperate parents with "at-risk" teens.
Very difficult to be objective, there is an inherent conflict of interest when one's livlihood is dependent on placements.
If PURE is operating unethically, that should be addressed-given the nature of the industry, its very likely.
Proof of that would not, by any stretch of the imagination, prove that their claims against WWASP's abusiveness and fraudulent practices are invalid.
I certainly hope these two issues do not get confused.
Deborah
-
What you WWASP people don't get is that most people on this board do not give a shit about PURE. Some find the fact that they refer kids to other programs problematic; others say the work they are doing against WWASP outweighs that potential harm.
But most don't care either way.
They want to shut down WWASP and don't care who their allies are. the enemy of my enemy is my friend, essentially.
So right or wrong is not an issue for you? What you are saying is that you will just hook up with anyone who agrees with you? What you are saying is that it does not matter to you, if they too, are doing something that is wrong. All that you require is that they agree with you, even if they are doing what you don't agree with?
-
It doesnt seem like right or wrong, it is a fact WWASPS is the enemy that most here are fighting, with the exception of one of the posters that seems to have a personal vendetta against others.
I dont care what Pure does, and quite frankly, that subject is boring. No, I am not a Pure follower but I am anti-WWASPS. That is the point.
-
This is 2003 on planet Earth. Things are in a mess. Teens are being unjustly incarcerated and abused to the tune of billions per year. The leader in this Industry is under fire.
When it happens that two entities within the same industry go head to head, I'm more than ecstatic to lend my support the the lessor of the evils to bring about the demise of the other.
When it happens that a third party, inside or independent of the industry, takes action to bring down the lessor of those two evils, I will ecstatically lend my support there.
The world is not black and white. One does what one can. And if that means temporarily lending my voice to the lessor of two evils to bring down the giant and set a precedent, so be it.
You can choose to be morally rightous, and avoid the gray areas. Or you can jump in and support any action that ultimately has a worthy goal.
And, there is a third option. Sit on the sidelines with your moral judgments and watch. But, please keep your rightous belly-aching to yourself. The rest of us have work to do.
Deborah
-
Deborah writes: "WWASP's treatment of children is abusive."
Deborah - in all respect, I ask you to PROVE IT! You yourself said you HAVE NO EXPERIENCE of WWASP schools. Are you not basing your judgment on what is written here or in newspapers? Most, but not all posters are from PURE. Others are posters using WWASP as an excuse for another parent or relative admitting their child without agreeing or signing the papers for the admission. The rest seem to be parents that believed their little darling when they said they were being abused.
I look for facts, not fiction. From what I know there have been NO proven cases of abuse at a WWASP School in all the years they've been helping families. Yes, Morava, Paradise Cove and Dundee Ranch closed. Don't know about Morava, but Paradise Cove did not close because of abuse or the HEAT, they closed by their own choice. Dundee closed temporarily, and from what I get from that, the former director who wrote the letter hasn't come forward to actually let the courts look at her allegations. I honestly don't care if they open again. From what I get, they were a thorn in WWASP's side from the beginning and unless something different happens, WWASP probably won't bring them back as one of their schools.
PURE isn't even close to being in the same league with WWASP. What a joke! You make them sound SO BIG AND BAD, but they're just a few unethical backstabbers pretending to be a WHOLE lot of people. They're nothing to me and have no weight in what decisions I make.
No one can predict the future...or can they?? It seems inevitable that PURE is grasping at the end of rope by their tactics to keep from going to prison for posting false allegations and defamation of character.
So, Deborah and others, if that's what you want to create for yourselves, No one's going to throw you a life preserver.
WWASP is NOT Straight, it is not CEDU, it's not even close to anything else out there. The only similarity is that they work with troubled teens. Instead of sitting behind a computer, find out where you can hear from the teens and families who can show you the success stories. It's not here in cyberspace!
-
FOR AN ORGANIZATION THAT CLAIMS NOT TO BE ABUSIVE (OBVIOUSLY THEY HAVE YOU FOOLED. ) THEY SURE SPEND A LOT OF EFFORT (AND ATTORNEY TIME )PUTTING DISCLAIMERS AND WAIVERS INTO THEIR PARENT CONTRACTS.
YOU WANT TO PUT A HAPPY GLOSS ON IT BUT, THE MESSAGE I HEAR IS ""WE WOULD NEVER EVER DO ANYTHING ABUSIVE, BUT JUST IN CASE, WE'LL CONTROL ALL THE OUTGOING MAIL, SWEAR THE PARENTS AND INMATES TO SECRECY, AND PUT IN A BUNCH OF LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO DISCLAIMING ANY LIABILITY IF ONE OF OUR PSYCH TECH'S GET TOO PHYSICAL."
IF IT LOOKS LIKE A DUCK AND QUACKS LIKE A DUCK...
AND NOW, THE CURRENT PROPAGANDA IS THAT, WELL DUNDEE RANCH WAS JUST AN ABBERRATION. AS ONE OF THE PREVIOUS WWASP POSTERS SAID, IT WAS "JUST ONE IDIOT" (LIKE THE OTHER SCHOOLS WERE JUST ABERRATIONS -- ALL OF THEM CLOSED ONLY BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO)
-
FOR AN ORGANIZATION THAT CLAIMS NOT TO BE ABUSIVE (OBVIOUSLY THEY HAVE YOU FOOLED. ) THEY SURE SPEND A LOT OF EFFORT (AND ATTORNEY TIME )PUTTING DISCLAIMERS AND WAIVERS INTO THEIR PARENT CONTRACTS.
YOU WANT TO PUT A HAPPY GLOSS ON IT BUT, THE MESSAGE I HEAR IS ""WE WOULD NEVER EVER DO ANYTHING ABUSIVE, BUT JUST IN CASE, WE'LL CONTROL ALL THE OUTGOING MAIL, SWEAR THE PARENTS AND INMATES TO SECRECY, AND PUT IN A BUNCH OF LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO DISCLAIMING ANY LIABILITY IF ONE OF OUR PSYCH TECH'S GET TOO PHYSICAL."
IF IT LOOKS LIKE A DUCK AND QUACKS LIKE A DUCK...
AND NOW, THE CURRENT PROPAGANDA IS THAT, WELL DUNDEE RANCH WAS JUST AN ABBERRATION. AS ONE OF THE PREVIOUS WWASP POSTERS SAID, IT WAS "JUST ONE IDIOT" (LIKE THE OTHER SCHOOLS WERE JUST ABERRATIONS -- ALL OF THEM CLOSED ONLY BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO) ONCE YOU GET 3 OR 4 OR FIVE SCHOOLS CLOSING, YOU CAN'T PASS IT OFF AS AN ABERRATION ANYMORE. ITS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
-
HUH??? Show me any business that deals with people that doesn't have disclaimers. Before my daughter participates in activites at the YMCA we have to sign their waivers.
I'd "imagine" that any place that takes on the responsibilities of caring for a troubled teen would have to have this? What's your point?
-
Speaking of disclaimers, anyone read PURE's lately? Sounds to me like Deborah is not too far off the mark (even if I disagree with her that the "ends justify the means") when she says most of these folks have a problem with accountability.
http://helpyourteens.com/terms_of_use.html (http://helpyourteens.com/terms_of_use.html)
::bigsmilebounce::
-
IF IT LOOKS LIKE A DUCK AND QUACKS LIKE A DUCK...
Get off your ::soapbox:: PURE!! :rofl: Too many people can see through your lame attempts to make yourselve(s) look like you're helping them.
-
Most of these people! I'd say ALL of these people at PURE! That disclaimer is a joke too!! They are, in essence, saying that their website is a fabricated bunch of crap and if we believe anything they say we are as stupid as they are.
-
Terms of Use
Please read the following Terms of Use/Disclaimer:
THE INFORMATION FROM OR THROUGH THIS SITE IS PROVIDED ?AS-IS,? ?AS AVAILABLE,? AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ARE DISCLAIMED (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE DISCLAIMER OF ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE). THE INFORMATION MAY CONTAIN ERRORS, PROBLEMS OR OTHER LIMITATIONS. OUR SOLE AND ENTIRE MAXIMUM LIABILITY FOR ANY INACCURATE INFORMATION, FOR ANY REASON, AND USER?S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER, SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE INFORMATION RECEIVED (IF ANY). WE ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF PROFITS, LITIGATION, OR THE LIKE). WHETHER BASED ON BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), PRODUCT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. THE LIMITATIONS OF DAMAGES SET FORTH ABOVE ARE FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF THE BASIS OF THE BARGAIN BETWEEN US AND YOU. WE WOULD NOT PROVIDE THIS SITE AND INFORMATION WITHOUT SUCH LIMITATIONS. NO REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES WHATSOEVER ARE MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY, ADEQUACY, RELIABILITY, CURRENTNESS, COMPLETENESS, SUITABILITY OR APPLICABILITY OF THE INFORMATION TO A PARTICULAR SITUATION.
Just thought I'd put the legaleze on the board in case they see they're busted and try to change it!
-
Anon wrote:
Deborah - in all respect, I ask you to PROVE IT!
I gave my definition of abuse. I need no more proof. Using that definition, all programs are abusive.
And:
You yourself said you HAVE NO EXPERIENCE of WWASP schools. Are you not basing your judgment on what is written here or in newspapers?
First of all, I don't consider them schools, but rather juvenile warehousing facilities. My son returned from a "prestigous, college-prep TBS" in Ga, five credits behind his peers, while scoring As and Bs there.
Yes, I base some of my judgments on news articles, just as you are and other's do. My personal experience is repeated over and over in every news article published. My research indicates that all facilities use the same baseline philosophy. Some may be more abusive or more covert with their abuse.
And:
Most, but not all posters are from PURE.
Prove that!! I don't think the statement is accurate. And, what if they are? Your point? How long have you been posting here?
Anon:
The rest seem to be parents that believed their little darling when they said they were being abused.
I think you are a child hater, thus your affiliation with WWASP.
And:
I look for facts, not fiction.
I think you look for "facts" to support your fiction.
And:
PURE isn't even close to being in the same league with WWASP. What a joke!
The joke is that you missed the point, which was not that they are "in the same league". They are two entities within the same industry. And both's integrity is questionable.
And:
So, Deborah and others, if that's what you want to create for yourselves, No one's going to throw you a life preserver.
What? Exactly what am I creating for myself? "No one's" going to throw me a life preserver? What in god's name are you talking about? Never mind, I don't even want to hear your twisted imaginings.
And:
WWASP is NOT Straight, it is not CEDU, it's not even close to anything else out there. The only similarity is that they work with troubled teens.
Work with? Read the policies of any program or facility. They're all, more alike than different. WWASP just happens to be in the spotlight just now. I hope each and everyone of them have their day under the heat of an interregation lamp.
And:
Instead of sitting behind a computer, find out where you can hear from the teens and families who can show you the success stories. It's not here in cyberspace!
You assume that I haven't heard "success" stories. I have. I also understand the mechanics of multi-level marketing, more accurate, Ponsi schemes, and WWASP sits on top of this one. I don't care to hear stories when the person sharing stands to gain monetarily from their "testimonial".
I have also heard many stories from disappointed parents.
I decided some years ago that I had nothing in common with program parents. I am repulsed by the very essence of who they are and they don't care for me. That is where it stands. Hearing another "success" story will not change my opinion of WWASP or the industry in general.
How arrogant of you to assume to know what I need, but then that is the way of those who support the warehousing of teens.
Deborah
-
QUOTE:
I'd "imagine" that any place that takes on the responsibilities of caring for a troubled teen would have to have this? What's your point?
THE POINT IS THIS:
PURE is not in the business of "caring" for troubled teens. They are in the business of referring them into specialty schools and programs for-a-fee paid for by the school or program, itself.
Not exactly kosher, wouldn't 'ya agree?
-
HA HA HA YOU DONT CARE IF DUNDEE OPENS THE OWNER IS THE SAME PERSON THAT OWNS CAROLINA SPRINPS AND A ARTICLE CAME OUT HE WAS BANNED FROM THAT SCHOOL ALSO. :lol: THEY DAY WILL COME
-
On 2003-08-10 15:32:00, Anonymous wrote:
"FOR AN ORGANIZATION THAT CLAIMS NOT TO BE ABUSIVE (OBVIOUSLY THEY HAVE YOU FOOLED. ) THEY SURE SPEND A LOT OF EFFORT (AND ATTORNEY TIME )PUTTING DISCLAIMERS AND WAIVERS INTO THEIR PARENT CONTRACTS.
<
Sometimes reading is a lot like listening - if you aren't fully present you can jump on something that has nothing to do with your reaction to it (lest I say respond) Of course PURE is not in the business of caring for teens, far, far from it. The above response (to the rocket scientist person) was for the above quote, not anything to do with the PURE disclaimer. Think for your keys hit the keyboard.
-
This post makes no sense. Wanna give it another try?
:???: