Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 09:04:00 AM
She finally took down the slander on Riffle.
Very good, Ginger. Now take down the same about two or three other survivors of child abuse institutions and we will be getting somewhere.
It's wrong and you know it and no matter how much other survivors are used to watching other people get trashed and abused and do nothing about it, it is still wrong.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 09:18:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-10 23:28:00, Antigen wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-10 07:01:00, Anonymous wrote:
Lie, lie, lie.
Check your facts when Warbis posts, people.
That slanderous thread title still exists, she didn't remove anything.
Uh... oversight? Why didn't you point it out back then?Quote
The first post on the slanderous Riffle thread was deleted, but the thread title is still there.
Yeah, I had to go into the database and do it 'by hand'. Thanks for the bug report. Next time I go looking for trouble in the code, I'll try and address that.Quote
Remove that slander now, Moderator Tyrant.
Ya' know, if you'd just not posted it in the first place we could have saved a whole lot of time and trouble and angst.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:19:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:19:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 06:18:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote"
On 2006-01-10 23:28:00, Antigen wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-10 07:01:00, Anonymous wrote:
Lie, lie, lie.
Check your facts when Warbis posts, people.
That slanderous thread title still exists, she didn't remove anything.
Uh... oversight? Why didn't you point it out back then?Quote
The first post on the slanderous Riffle thread was deleted, but the thread title is still there.
Yeah, I had to go into the database and do it 'by hand'. Thanks for the bug report. Next time I go looking for trouble in the code, I'll try and address that.Quote
Remove that slander now, Moderator Tyrant.
Ya' know, if you'd just not posted it in the first place we could have saved a whole lot of time and trouble and angst.
More lies from the moderator. She would have left that shit up forever if someone had not caught her in her lie. You people really believe all that technical shit she says?
I did not post it, nor did you. It doesn't matter. You could be next. Imagine having YOUR name attached to that slander that you ignored. Would you have the time, the know-how and the money to even figure out who did it in the first place? Likely those three things would yield no results anyways. It remains in Ginger Warbis' hands whether or not vile slander and personal attacks on YOU remain up on this website for anyone to read who might google you along down the line somewhere.
Think about it, and quit protecting Ginger. She would never ever protect you. She lets all kinds of abuse and very damaging personal slander stand on this website, on her own friends, even, and she does nothing about it.
Again, Ginger would never protect you. It remains up to the rest of us to decide we have had enough. That shit was taken down on Luke Riffle because a bunch of us stood up to Ginger Warbis. If you did not participate in putting pressure on her, I bet you are just a little disappointed in yourself. Now you CAN stand up for your fellow survivors, whereas, in straight you could not. The price you might pay? As we have recently seen, personal attacks, deletion or hiding of your act of standing up and so on. Nevertheless, together we can make a difference.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:31:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 07:19:00, Anonymous wrote:
I did not post it, nor did you. It doesn't matter.
Yes, it DOES matter if the person that started complaining about that post in the first place is the one who POSTED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE and THEN proceeds to post even MORE vile bullshit about even MORE people in an attempt to get her to remove THEIR post. Why couldn't they just have contacted her and asked that she remove it???????
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:43:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 07:19:00, Anonymous wrote:
"but you did remove it and you do respond on this site, not "the forum hosting facilities".
Yes, she responds to both. That is if she can find her way through the cacophony of repetitive posts.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:44:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:44:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:45:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 07:44:00, Anonymous wrote:
"is this her responding inthe third person?"
Nope.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 10:54:00 AM
Again, my OPINION after having to read through this shit for a while now.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:01:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:07:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:01:00, Anonymous wrote:
"i respect your OPINION but i do not think it is only one person complaining. i guess i respect that she doesnt take down the really slanderous shit about herself, but i can see that might take some time."
I didn't say it was one person complaining. I said that it appears that the one person who started the complaining about that original post was the one who posted it in the first place. Then their solution, it appears, was just to go ahead and start slamming other people in an effort to get her to remove it when they could hvae just contacted her and asked that she remove it.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:08:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:11:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:08:00, Anonymous wrote:
"i contacted her and asked her to remove something and she said she did not have the time to talk with me about such things. i guess only famous people matter"
I find that difficult to believe. Who are these "famous people" you're referring to?
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:12:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:08:00, Anonymous wrote:
"i contacted her and asked her to remove something and she said she did not have the time to talk with me about such things. i guess only famous people matter"
Was the something a post that you wrote or someone else?
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:15:00 AM
pj
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:36:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:36:00 AM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:39:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:36:00, Anonymous wrote:
"something someone else wrote"
She has said repeatedly that she will not delete something unless the person who posted it requests the deletion.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 11:40:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:36:00, Anonymous wrote:
"and how come we cant go back and edit some of the stuff we wrote?"
you can if you use your login name. You can't edit anonymous posts unless you contact her and she can verify with reasonable certainty that you are the author. She's stated this numerous times as well.
Post by: Antigen on January 12, 2006, 11:55:00 AM
See, back then, it was the topic of the slander who first asked for it to be removed. When I asked the actual author (who was then posting from a regular old cable access type account, not proxies or campus libraries and stuff) he freaked the fuck out.
I think it's either that he actually is sort of pro program--just can't stand to see a bunch of program screw ups merrily chatting away w/o paranoia or harassment-- or he's extremely paranoid and thinks I'm trying to trick him into confessing.
So now we're getting cryptic demands to delete some more shit, probably more shit that he posted. And I'm supposed to guess or somthing.
Here's the thing, Animals. Sure, I can delete this whole site. It would take me less than half a minute to just drop the entire database and delete the one directory of files that make up these pages. What I can't do, because of imutible constraints of time and my total lack of mind reading ability, is to decide for you or for anyone else what should stay and what should go.
The only reason I blew that shit out was because you finally gave me some manner of permission; "yeah, well, maybe it was somebody who was over here using my puter." Yeah, well, good enough as I guess you'd be liable for that if you look over the fine print of your ISP account.
The other stuff about Cayo's family, that was a mistake. I should have left it up there and let the offended parties decide whether or not to take it seriously. Trouble is, I have a big soft spot in my heart for people who got fucked up by that cult. Especially living in the area that you do, I can't stand (well, can't is a strong word) the idea of you getting cuffed and stuffed and bound by all kinds of 'helping field' legal and social disabilities, all over a stupit pissing contest that you just can't win.
I won't make that mistake again. Promise.
Bigot: One fanatically devoted to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and intolerant of those who differ.
Webster's
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 12:06:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:39:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:36:00, Anonymous wrote:
"something someone else wrote"
She has said repeatedly that she will not delete something unless the person who posted it requests the deletion."
And, as we all have seen this past weekend, this is not true.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 12:13:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 09:06:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:39:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:36:00, Anonymous wrote:
"something someone else wrote"
She has said repeatedly that she will not delete something unless the person who posted it requests the deletion."
And, as we all have seen this past weekend, this is not true."
It looks as if she deleted repetetive posts. Posts/threads stating essentially the same thing just with slightly different words.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 12:18:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:12:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:08:00, Anonymous wrote:
"i contacted her and asked her to remove something and she said she did not have the time to talk with me about such things. i guess only famous people matter"
Was the something a post that you wrote or someone else?"
I am not the Anonymous your talking to there but i sayw soething on the forum i usually go to and it was about a girl i knew in a program and someone said some lie about her with her WHOLE, REAL name on it. She called me from Ottawa even though i moved to Germany two years ago & she has no money, she found a friend with a credit card & had to work out a whole thing because she said she was afraid if she called fornits she would even get her phone number put up. Where she works was doing surprise background checks on pepole there (sorry for typos i am running late) and they found that thin about her... make a long story short she waz too paranoid to even call forntis, i said i would look at it for her, she said the person in charge of fornits did it because her program paid her to do it to slander her reputation because she started talking to parents in that program who stil have kids in there. So I sent a message to the fornits leader and she said she was in the middle of a party. I was reading over here because i was researching my program i was in & I found a whole thing about straight being the start of it all. Anyways, coincidentality I ran into a bunch of these threads over here that reminded me of this thing with my friend.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 12:25:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 09:18:00, Anonymous wrote:
So I sent a message to the fornits leader and she said she was in the middle of a party.
Did you try and contact her again? Maybe she actually WAS busy at that particular moment.
Post by: Antigen on January 12, 2006, 12:25:00 PM
Ministers say that they teach charity. That is natural. They live on hand-outs. All beggars teach that others should give.
--Robert G. Ingersoll, American politician and lecturer
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:13:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 09:25:00, Antigen wrote:
"What, now I'm supposed to be able to read paranoid minds and discern intent? Please!"
More illogical statements from AntiGinger. You don't have to read anyone's mind when it comes to personal slander attacks. It is very simple: take down the personal slander on survivors of child abuse institutions who have already had their dignity and privacy destroyed plenty enough without you setting up this site and using survivors for your own purposes. You set up this site and therefore you bear responsibility.
By your logic, no one should remove slander and shit off a bathroom wall because that is what this site amounts to. Your personal bathroom stalls where people can write up whatever shit they want to on anyone, but no one can cross it out but you.
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 12, 2006, 01:16:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:19:00 PM
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 12, 2006, 01:25:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:25:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:19:00, Anonymous wrote:
"He might if he hadn't have posted the slander in the first damn place, but that fact kinda obscures his point. Do you think he'll own up to the shit he's posted here about anyone and have it taken down?"
"He" is not the only person who has ever posted slanderous shit on other people, as the Anon a few above has pointed out it goes on in other forums too.
By the way, you have been brainwashed by Antigen and GregFL to think that "he" is even among those posting here at all lately. A few of us know the facts. The rest of you should at least question the "facts" presented to you by the Moderators.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:29:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:33:00 PM
Quote
http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... 120#163925 (http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?topic=3785&forum=7&start=120#163925)
On 2006-01-12 08:35:00, Anonymous wrote:
"not threatened, but i was told that there was a group of "comcerned" individuals that numbered 10 or so. it was in reference to whether i should get kicked off the site. "
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 01:40:00 PM
Sheesh... :evil:
Seriously, you buncha gas-bags. :lol:
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:44:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It's fairly obvious that "he" is posting here. I'm not denying that others are and have also but "he" is. Is "he" willing to own up to what "he" posted? Is "he" willing to ask that the slander that "he" wrote about Sammie, Mike, Kim, Ginger, Greg etc. be removed?"
Again, you are brainwashed. The day after Montel, a bunch of shit went up on Sammie Monroe. Logic states this: Sammie was on the Montel Williams show and spoke at length about child abuse at Straight, Inc. Millions of people saw that show, and probably a good percentage of them googled it and ended up here. HAve you ever seen Jerry Springer? That's the mentality of a good percentage of the US. Any one or several of those millions of people could have posted those lies about Sammie.
Personally if someone posted slander on you would the first thought in your mind be "gee i should call them to have a conversation about this?" No. You have already been abused by someone. You already got tricked into Straight and brainwashed and abused by people there, of course you are afraid of anyone who abuses you some more & the last thing you want to do is talk to someone who has already verbally abused you and will most likely do so again.
If personal slander gets posted on you, should you have to somehow figure out how to get the law on your side to even do anything about it? No. If you are a survivor of a child abuse institution who already had the police collaborate against them in taking children back to straight over and over again you may be paranoid of the police, and rightly so.
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 01:51:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:44:00, Anonymous wrote:
Again, you are brainwashed. The day after Montel, a bunch of shit went up on Sammie Monroe. Logic states this: Sammie was on the Montel Williams show and spoke at length about child abuse at Straight, Inc. Millions of people saw that show, and probably a good percentage of them googled it and ended up here. HAve you ever seen Jerry Springer? That's the mentality of a good percentage of the US. Any one or several of those millions of people could have posted those lies about Sammie.
I don't deny that "he" wasn't the only one to post shit about Sammie, but "he" was one of the main one's to do so. It also started before the Montel show. How about the others that "he" slammed time and again?
Quote
Personally if someone posted slander on you would the first thought in your mind be "gee i should call them to have a conversation about this?"
Actually, that would be one of the first things that crossed my mind but seeing as he did it anonymously there really wouldn't be any way to do that now would there?
Quote
If personal slander gets posted on you, should you have to somehow figure out how to get the law on your side to even do anything about it?
Yes, that thought occured to a few of the people being slaughtered by "him". That's why Ginger, according to what she's posted, warned "him" that "he" may be in for more than "he" wanted. Looks as if people that "he" was slamming.... repeatedly, got tired of it and a couple of them decided to involve the law. Ginger, it appears, talked them out of it.
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 01:52:00 PM
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 01:53:00 PM
Post by: Antigen on January 12, 2006, 02:02:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 09:06:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:39:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 08:36:00, Anonymous wrote:
"something someone else wrote"
She has said repeatedly that she will not delete something unless the person who posted it requests the deletion."
And, as we all have seen this past weekend, this is not true."
Right, it's not true. I also delete spam and flooding.
I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.
--Frank Lloyd Wright, American architect
Post by: Antigen on January 12, 2006, 02:09:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:13:00, Anonymous wrote:
You don't have to read anyone's mind when it comes to personal slander attacks. It is very simple: take down the personal slander on survivors of child abuse institutions who have already had their dignity and privacy destroyed plenty enough without you setting up this site and using survivors for your own purposes. You set up this site and therefore you bear responsibility.
Ok, that sounds really simple! Now then, do I do the same for Richard Knowels? Chris Casselor? The rest of the peer staff who carried out the marching orders? They fit that bill. Do I do the same for Melvin and Betty, since they obviously were mindfuckec by Art? Where does one draw the line? It all comes down to whatever you want or whatever I want if you think it all the way through.
That's not what this site is about. Now, I have no idea what the original post was all about or who posted it. If you'll let me know, maybe I can find the author, let them know ppl are asking (lol, asking, nice euphemism, eh?) for the post to be removed and MAYBE they'll just say "Oh, yeah, well go ahead and blow it out, I don't care."
But it's a whole lot easier to get that done if you cut right to the chase at the beginning. I think the odds are rather long now. But, wth, pm me w/ the url of the post in question and I'll take a look.
BTW, if this whole row really did start around the time of the first Luke post, I probably was having a party at the time. See, my prodigal daughter had just returned home. We were all about killing the fatted calf for a couple of months, especially leading up to the holy daze. That would have been the first time in around 4 years we would all have been together again for Thanksgiving.
Quote
By your logic, no one should remove slander and shit off a bathroom wall because that is what this site amounts to. Your personal bathroom stalls where people can write up whatever shit they want to on anyone, but no one can cross it out but you.
Well, actually, I rather enjoy bathroom wall and picnic table grafitti. Anyone w/ any sense knows better than to take it litterally. And you can get an idea of the creative talent and general mindset of local kids by reading it.
The Church says that the earth is flat, but I know that it is round, for I have seen the shadow on the moon, and I have more faith in a shadow than in the Church.
--Ferdinand Magellan, Portuguese and Spanish explorer
_________________
Drug war POW Straight, Sarasota
`80 - `82
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 12, 2006, 02:44:00 PM
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 12, 2006, 02:55:00 PM
Post by: Antigen on January 12, 2006, 03:29:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 11:44:00, starry-eyed pirate wrote:
"But if someone reads slander about themselves on the bathroom stall at the local waterin' hole they can cross it out, I know this is a message board not a bathroom stall but I think the question is legit. How does one cross out the slander against oneself here ??"
That's the thing, you can't cross it out. Each site admin has the technical ability to delete or alter any damned thing on their server. But, as anon notes and demonstrates, they can just repost it over and over again w/o even having to physically enter that bathroom stall again.
It might fuck up some people's day, but it also works to advantage. Virgil and Melvin also lack the ability to prevent people from telling tales about things they'd rather not discuss.
Now, I will make an attempt, time permitting of course, to edit or delete material at the request of any author. Notice how Reagan Youth poofed out of existance? That's because he sent me a PM asking me to delete those posts and the user account. I didn't even save a copy for myself, they're just gone.
The difference? I was reasonably sure that the person asking for the stuff to be deleted was the same person who write it. Therefore, they own it. And, while I can't control things like the Google cache or the wayback machine or individuals copying and saving stuff, I will honor, to the best of my ability, anyone's ownership of their own words. It sort of makes it a little closer to fair, as anon posts don't have a password so you can't edit them. It's not fair to ppl who's ISPs use proxies w/o asking them cause I can't verify those. But ppl using proxies for the intended purpose of hiding their ID from me.... well, ok, it's none of my business who you are if you don't want me to know. I mean that, I'm fine w/ it, really. You're heartily welcome here. But it also means that I can't help you if you want something gone.
The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
-- John Adams, (1772)
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 03:30:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 11:44:00, starry-eyed pirate wrote:
"But if someone reads slander about themselves on the bathroom stall at the local waterin' hole they can cross it out, I know this is a message board not a bathroom stall but I think the question is legit. How does one cross out the slander against oneself here ??"
By responding to it accordingly, or just taking it for what it really is...just some stupid shit written on a fucking php board. WAY too much hot air has been wasted on this.
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 03:31:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:35:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:36:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 12:31:00, Frank Discussion wrote:Hit the nail on the head
"Antigen, you sure can be long-winded sometimes. No offense."
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:37:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 12:35:00, Anonymous wrote:Rock the globe man!!
"it would be cool if we could develop some medium where people can duke it out online. maybe a video game where each party wears one of those way too fat sumo outfits and tries to beat the other up all over the screen. sort of like a virtual reality d&d meets fight club. it could be fun and help vent hostility. each time someone is hit or contacted they could be made to utter ridiculous straight phrases. not muchof a computer guy but think this would be funny. when people get to into it online we send them to the "time out sumo room""
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:48:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:54:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 03:57:00 PM
Post by: teachback on January 12, 2006, 03:59:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 04:03:00 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 12, 2006, 08:47:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It's fairly obvious that "he" is posting here. I'm not denying that others are and have also but "he" is. Is "he" willing to own up to what "he" posted? Is "he" willing to ask that the slander that "he" wrote about Sammie, Mike, Kim, Ginger, Greg etc. be removed?"
I'm new here, are we talking about Jesus?
Post by: Anonymous on January 13, 2006, 07:59:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 17:47:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It's fairly obvious that "he" is posting here. I'm not denying that others are and have also but "he" is. Is "he" willing to own up to what "he" posted? Is "he" willing to ask that the slander that "he" wrote about Sammie, Mike, Kim, Ginger, Greg etc. be removed?"
I'm new here, are we talking about Jesus?"
uh yeah, Jesus is posting on fornits now. :roll:
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 13, 2006, 10:07:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 17:47:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It's fairly obvious that "he" is posting here. I'm not denying that others are and have also but "he" is. Is "he" willing to own up to what "he" posted? Is "he" willing to ask that the slander that "he" wrote about Sammie, Mike, Kim, Ginger, Greg etc. be removed?"
I'm new here, are we talking about Jesus?"
:rofl:
Post by: Antigen on January 13, 2006, 01:10:00 PM
Jesus Saves!
20% off all Fornits Workshop services to anyone named Jesus. Offer good through my birthday and void wherever prohibited and all that rot.
I turned to speak to God, About the world's despair; But to make bad matters worse, I found God wasn't there.
--Robert Frost, American poet
Post by: Anonymous on January 13, 2006, 04:22:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-13 10:10:00, Antigen wrote:
"Jesus Saves!
20% off all Fornits Workshop services to anyone named Jesus. Offer good through my birthday and void wherever prohibited and all that rot.I turned to speak to God, About the world's despair; But to make bad matters worse, I found God wasn't there.
--Robert Frost, American poet
"
Whallah.
Post by: Anonymous on January 13, 2006, 04:44:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 12:31:00, Frank Discussion wrote:
"Antigen, you sure can be long-winded sometimes. No offense."
Long-winded, or typical short American attention span?
Post by: Anonymous on January 13, 2006, 04:51:00 PM
Post by: Antigen on January 14, 2006, 02:12:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-13 13:44:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 12:31:00, Frank Discussion wrote:
"Antigen, you sure can be long-winded sometimes. No offense."
Long-winded, or typical short American attention span? "
Eh, no, I do talk too much, explain too much and generally get punked that way. Thanks, though.
A drug is neither moral nor immoral - it's a chemical compound. The compound itself is not a menace to society until a human being treats it as if consumption bestowed a temporary license to act like an asshole.
--Frank Zappa
Post by: Anonymous on January 17, 2006, 09:39:00 AM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 17:47:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Quote
On 2006-01-12 10:29:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It's fairly obvious that "he" is posting here. I'm not denying that others are and have also but "he" is. Is "he" willing to own up to what "he" posted? Is "he" willing to ask that the slander that "he" wrote about Sammie, Mike, Kim, Ginger, Greg etc. be removed?"
I'm new here, are we talking about Jesus?"
::bwahaha:: ::bwahaha::
Post by: WWFSMD on January 17, 2006, 12:53:00 PM
Quote
On 2006-01-12 17:47:00, Anonymous wrote:
I'm new here, are we talking about Jesus?"
No, this guy!
?
If we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion by education
--Thomas Jefferson
Post by: starry-eyed pirate on January 17, 2006, 03:41:00 PM
Post by: WWFSMD on January 17, 2006, 03:46:00 PM
Quote
On 2004-03-01 20:56:00, Penis Birders Anonymous wrote:
"
,ououououououououo.
o o
u u
o <0 o
u ( u
o x o
u c=========8 u
o o
u u
ouououou. .ouououou'
l l _|/
l l ." ".
l l /(o)-(o)
/_)ll / )
l_)ll '- o . .
_)l '.___.' / |/|_.
l l _/ / ._| '/
l_l .___./ ) /
_/__/__ l==l
/ / ` l l
// l l
` / l / l
; ll l____/
l ll l
; ll /_/
l-----< o.o >
/ > - <
| 8=m=====m=D
| | | |. .|
| | | |. .|
| | | |. .|
| | | _ _/
| | |^/ | ^
| / |
`'
Love ya, Father Cassian! Love ya, group!
"
The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie-deliberate, contrived, and dishonest-but the myth-persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
--John F. Kennedy, U.S. President