Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - RMA Survivor

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
16
Quote from: "Ursus"
Whilst reporting on a recent talk on adolescent brain development given by Jeff Georgi, Lon Woodbury manages to deliver a snippy low blow to not only CAFETY, but also Washington state.

-------------- • -------------- • -------------- • --------------

Essays
Posted: Dec 24, 2009

JEFFREY M. GEORGI, CAFETY, AND THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN

by Lon Woodbury

The highlight of the recent Independent Educational Consultants Association (IECA) conference in Charlotte, NC, was a three hour presentation on Saturday morning Nov. 14, 2009, by Jeffrey M. Georgi on the Adolescent Brain. Georgi is the Clinical Director of the Duke University Addictions Program, an author and a popular speaker.

The ballroom was full, which is remarkable considering it was on a Saturday morning after a long and exhausting conference. The wide attendance was a powerful testimony to his expertise and knowledge of the subject. The attendees were not disappointed, and many remarked to me how much they had learned from the presentation.

A major emphasis, since he was speaking to a group of professional educators, was outlining the development of the brains of adolescents. A major point was that a person's brain was not fully developed until a person is into his/her twenties. This conclusion from exhaustive research tells us that many of the impulsive, silly and self-destructive decisions adolescents make are because their brains are not yet fully developed. Their forebrain is not developed enough to put a check on impulsive behaviors. In a sense, when an adolescent does something dumb, it's because their brain has not developed enough to think through the consequences. "If it feels good, do it" seems to be the mantra for the adolescent brain. The ability to think through consequences and implications of a given action will come later when the brain is fully developed.

One of the most frequent comments I heard after Georgi's presentation was "I wish the CAFETY representatives had been there for the presentation." What they were referring to was the well-attended Point/Counterpoint presentation the previous afternoon where representatives of CAFETY and A-START debated representatives from the schools and consultants attending the conference on the topic "Federal Legislation and Therapeutic Schools and Programs."

CAFETY stands for Community Alliance for the Ethical Treatment of Youth. They have been very critical of some residential Therapeutic schools and programs and are strong proponents of youth rights.

What the attendees had in mind in their comments about Georgi's presentation was that during that Point/Counterpoint debate, one of the CAFETY representatives pointed to the State of Washington Age of Consent legislation as a model that should be widely adopted. Part of this legislation requires a child of 13 or older to give their consent before the child can be placed into a residential program. If the child does not want to go to a residential program, the state will enforce that child's right to refuse, even if it is the parents who are trying to make that placement or bring the child home, and the child is involved in very dangerous activities. The only exception would be if a Judge orders the child into placement, which usually is only when an adolescent commits a crime and is sentenced into a Juvenile Justice facility.

All the consultants and school program people in the room picked up on the contradiction between the CAFETY youth rights ideal and Georgi's reality. They were very aware how dangerous it would be for a child with a still forming brain to have that right before the child's brain had developed the ability to foresee tragic consequences.

Indeed, there have been adolescent lives lost that can be traced back to this State of Washington legislation. One parent, whose 13-year-old daughter had been brutally murdered in Spokane, WA, while turning tricks to support her crack habit in the 1990s had established the BECCA Foundation, named after his deceased daughter. His daughter, Becca, had started running away from home at age 13. The State law had prohibited her parents from bringing her back home because she did not consent to go back home, and the State took her into custody. However, the State was unable to keep her in either a foster home or a youth program in Spokane and was reluctant to take action to ensure she would stay in a program, again likely due to the question of youth rights as defined by the legislation.

The BECCA Foundation lobbied to modify the law to better protect children and obtained legislative approval, but the Governor vetoed the modified legislation saying it was "too repressive."

It is our job as a society to protect our children! Giving them rights before they are able to responsibly handle them does no service to children, especially those who like to "live on the edge." We need to rethink the whole question of children's rights in light of research on the functioning of the adolescent brain.


Copyright © 2009, Woodbury Reports, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

I didn't see where this Brain Study was widely accepted as factual.  I also notice how Woodbury leaps to the conclusion that the study means all kids are incapable of making rationale judgment calls about their own welfare, thus the law is of no value, and in a sense, feels that having judges make a determination about whether a kid should be "locked up" in a RTC is flawed.  Suggesting that others, namely himself, should be the ones who decide what is best for the child.  

Citing the death of a single teen, Becca, is weak.  Granted her death is tragic, but I didn't get a complete picture of the cause of her death. It was suggested that someone related to crack murdered her.  But it could have been anyone.  However Woodbury clearly feels that only an RTC would have saved her.  I am unable to make this leap of logic.  I can see Woodbury making the leap of logic that kids rights should be changed in favor of making their arrival at an RTC easier.  Further, I would suspect that Woodbury would also like to see the rights of the child once they are inside an RTC, weakened as well.  

Woodbury sees research about child brain development as connected directly to the placement of kids in RTC's.  He is connecting data that is not connected, in order to draw the conclusion that kids brains are not fully developed, thus they need an RTC to develop them.  And that any laws protecting a child from the legally established harmful effects of many of these CEDU-based programs and a child's decision to not attend, are wrong.  Much like the programs themselves, they believe the teen should have no input or decision making in their own development and should leave it to others to decide their fate and how they will be developed.  No therapy works without the cooperation and input of the patient.  Yet these programs believe they can dictate therapy with the patient having no control or input themselves.  I find it revealing that the judge decided the changes to the laws were too repressive.  Maybe he knew about these programs.  

It is frightening to read that Woodbury equates child rights with decision making.  That he would deny children rights entirely seems to be evident in what I read.  And all because some study was conducted that found the brain of a child is not fully developed before their twenties.  And it appears that Woodbury, not the study itself, came to the conclusion that "not fully developed" therefore must mean that children can not make any rational decisions.  He specifically writes,"This conclusion from exhaustive research tells us that many of the impulsive, silly and self-destructive decisions adolescents make are because their brains are not yet fully developed."   I would find it remarkable if the study itself formed that same conclusion.  And I doubt it did.  I think Woodbury believes he can make the leap of logic for all of us.  Thankfully my brain is fully developed and I can make the decision that Woodbury is full of himself and will find anything, no matter how unrelated, to support his goals and that of the Troubled Teen Industry.

17
Aspen Education Group / Re: Mount Bachelor Academy Shut Down
« on: December 27, 2009, 03:24:14 PM »
I totally agree.  And further, there is some evidence that staff bought in to the programs on some level.  I commented on some other thread about how when I was at RMA, there were staff who actually formed "split contracts" with other staff.  That they felt a need to run away, whereas it was just a job...couldn't they just quit?  

And though many staff came from the local town, the staff all seemed to spend their time off with each other.  This had to reinforce the behavior of the collective.  That nobody outside the program could possibly understand them.  That they too, no longer fit in to normal society just as students who left found it difficult to readjust.  And you see this in the way staff move from one program to another, rarely if ever leaving the system they created for themselves.  

Did you ever notice that staff seemed to marry staff?  How often does that happen in the work place where you marry your co-worker?  Some came in to the program already married, and it seemed their spouses tended to work there as well.  Lisa and Brett Carrey.  Ray Kreider and his wife.  Doug and Mona Kim-Brown.  Tim and Kathy Brace.  Caroline Wolfe and Randy Eide.  Dan and Carmen Earle.  Dan and Mare Krumptitch.  Come work for us, invite the whole family!

Cults reinforce the concept of not being able to function without the cult.   It is like being religious and not being able to marry outside of your religion.

And because it was like they were creating their own religion, with themselves as the priests, writing their own dogma as they went along, it was far easier, in my opinion, for a mob mentality to form.  Where everything they did was sanctioned by themselves, determined to be good based on group consensus, all acts justified because as priests, they decided collectively they were infallible.

18
Aspen Education Group / Re: Mount Bachelor Academy Shut Down
« on: December 27, 2009, 01:19:02 PM »
Quote from: "Ursus"
Quote from: "Basedonfacts"
For every program that is out there that violates the commons laws in place that govern these institutions, there are programs out there and people running them with the very best of intentions. To make blanket statements like this is child abuse or that I condone child abuse is flat out insane.
I don't see how intentions have anything to do with proving or disproving that child abuse went on. Moreover,

    "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."[/list]

    I completely agree. Good intentions or not, proof of abuse isn't based on what someone intended.  If you put your kid on your roof and tell them to jump off to show them they can't fly and teach them what you think is a valuable lesson, when he breaks his leg, good intentions or not, it is abuse.  

    And I hear this argument a lot, not just here on Fornits, but on other sites as well.  A lot of people who defend the program argue that the staff weren't evil, they went in to it with good intentions.  And I don't know what value you can place on that.  Or if it is true or not.  We all know that these programs take the worst sort of people and make them counselors.  Staff with criminal backgrounds, drug abuse issues, anger issues, alcohol problems and some are potentially or literally child molesters with no concept of boundaries.  Yet they are hired.  But whereas a normal, well balanced and average intelligence individual might readily understand that yelling, screaming, hurling endless obscenities and humiliations, making girls perform lap dances, having kids condemn their friends to die (life boat experience) and making them write their own epitaphs, is wrong, some of these staff weren't all that bright or well educated to begin with.  

    So were all of them capable of understanding that what they were doing was abuse?  I know most had to have been able to.  They weren't all complete idiots.  Which leads me to believe that if most knew, and none objected or tried to put an end to it, you can't make the argument that best intentions were the rule.  It seems like collusion was the rule.  But again, to be fair, you have to consider that Stanford University experiment in social behavior from way back.  When normal people who were not cruel, but basically people who were typically as politically correct as could be back then, when given authority, collectively abused it.  And they probably all went in to it with good intentions.  But I bet, when their behavior was later pointed out to them, they were able to recognize that they had abused those under their control.  And, I am just as willing to bet that those who were abused, were probably not able to see good intentions as justification for the abuse.  And as you pointed out, determining whether abuse took place does not require one to consider whether anyone had good intentions.  I do think it is interesting, the Stanford University Prisoner/Guard study and the abuse that went on at these programs, to delve deeper in to what conditions need to exist where adults are able to rationalize abuse in their own minds as not being abusive. And collectively rationalize it.  Because if you accept that they were capable of knowing it was abuse, how did they then rationalize their actions?  It sounds like they decided their intentions were good, thus it wasn't the same as if they had sought to abuse in the first place.

    19
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: Your CEDU fulltime
    « on: December 27, 2009, 03:29:27 AM »
    Quote from: "Joel"
    How long was your fulltime?
    Why were you put on a fulltime?
    Who ran your fulltime?
    What work assignments were you required to do?  

    Note:  I understand if you don't want to discuss your fulltime experience.

    My full time was originally about 14 days.  I looked good, got off quick.  Got caught sending a letter to girl friend, went back on full time for about three more weeks.  Total time, probably 30 days.  

    I was put on full time for having sex with a female student.

    Four staff were allowed to run my full time, I was banned from the entire school and nearly all staff members.  

    I knew the system so on the first night I wrote out about thirty writing assignments knowing what assignments they would want me to write about.  The next day they assigned me writing assignments, I had them all done.  And then some.  So for days I had no assignments because I was too far ahead of the game.  I was then assigned to break up a massive chunk of concrete that had been dumped on the campus.  The assignment was supposed to last for a week or more.  My understanding of physics and pressure points enabled me to finish the job in several hours.  I was then assigned to stock wood pellets and logs to all furnace locations on campus until all were fully stocked.  I cheated and got the help of several younger students who usually worked under me in the wood corral to assist, knowing nobody would ask them if they had helped me.  The job was done in two hours.  Later I was told to simply shovel snow endlessly as it snowed endlessly.  

    During full time part two, I actually got a project.  The wanted me to construct a path connecting the kitchen to the main deck.  I put a lot of effort in to it and designed it to have drainage, something everyone else seemed incapable of even considering, so my path survived whereas all others were usually destroyed or damaged every Spring during the thaw.  I understand it remained intact years after I left.  Go me!  

    My raps sessions were rather sedate as nobody really had any clue what to say to me.  Most knew the girl I had sex with and myself were very close for eighteen months before having sex, thus it didn't seem like such a heinous crime.  Staff had to force people to talk to me, but it didn't work too well.  And since I was not out of agreement for anything but the sex, there was precious little anyone could come up with to indict me on.  Mainly, because she kept a diary of our exploits and I did not, because I had no recollection of precisely how many times we had actually had sex, that became the only real focus.  So with nothing to go on, they ended my full time quickly.  There seemed to be a general understanding that all full times had to last fourteen days minimum, so mine did.  Then I wrote a letter to her, trying to sneak it out using a member of the kitchen staff, who ended up turning me in.  Armed with something new, I was back on full time.  When my parents realized I was not in classes but instead doing hard labor, they demanded the full time end.  And it did.  

    Most students regularly broke bans with me, to smile, give me the thumbs up, whisper something to me, so other than sitting and staring at the broom closet for thirty days, it wasn't really as horrible as full times generally are.  And I am a writer, so I spent most of my time writing a novel, which normally I would be banned from doing if I spent 30 days on anything since that would be considering hiding out...But it looked like I was doing writing assignments.  So overall I got through it pretty unscathed.  And the staff knew it, which made it all the more satisfying.  And the girl was kicked out three days after we were caught, but we hooked up after and remained boy and girlfriend for more than five years, so it was a real relationship and not a one night stand.  And since the school knew that, it probably helped.  I don't think anyone ever argued whether we actually loved each other.

    20
    Aspen Education Group / Re: Mount Bachelor Academy Shut Down
    « on: December 27, 2009, 03:09:28 AM »
    I find your statement that kids today are more intelligent to be false.  I generally find kids today, despite a greater access to information, don't use it.  They are not well read, in fact most do little reading whatsoever, have virtually no grasp of history, are not capable of doing actual research, and are extremely superficial and do not ask deep questions of anything.  

    Further, I have been in Raps and Propheets, a few years earlier than yourself, and I can attest that they are abuse and have virtually no legitimate therapeutic value.  The authorities that investigated Mount Bachelor, interviewed the teens about what went on, and determined based on that testimony that the program was abusive, degrading and being run by people with no credentials or little if any training.  They shut it down for many reasons.  

    If Hilltop saved your life, I think that is great.  I don't know what you attribute to the program as being the key to your life saving experience, but for many of us who went through these programs, we were not saved.  Our experiences were different from your own.  Being yelled at, humiliated and degraded for two straight years did nothing to make us better people.  For us, it did not save us.  Many of us felt we didn't need to be saved to begin with, that our "crimes" were not so severe that they required us being imprisoned far from our homes and families and friends and subjected to daily abuse.  

    So what saved you?  Work details?  Full times?  Endless labor?  Being yelled at regularly for the most trivial of matters?  Pounding your fists in to pillows and screaming obscenities at your parents and yourself?  Condemning your friends to death in a life boat experience?  Writing your epitaph?  Perhaps it was the blaring, repetitive music?  Maybe watching girls dress up in skimpy outfits and performing lap dances for staff and students?  Did the lugs help?  

    I find that most who claim they were saved or the program helped them end up really just saying they met some great friends, had some fun at the farm, or going on hikes, and don't mention anything about the actual program itself.  And when you discuss the program specifically, they can't form cohesive positions because the program was so weird and bizarre they are still a bit vague on what exactly it was all about.  

    Best intentions is something I also hear repeated.  That the staff weren't intentionally trying to hurt us.  That they had the best intentions in mind.  That they weren't evil, they just didn't know.  When the authorities shut down Mount Bachelor, they weren't claiming anyone was evil.  They weren't claiming that the staff didn't have good intentions.  They simply recognized abuse and humiliation and trauma when they heard it or saw it.  It's funny that when real psychologists and therapists are brought in to access the programs, they come away horrified.  It's not too hard to spot abuse.  Just because someone says they had best intentions in mind, doesn't change the fact that what they did was wrong.  I firmly believe every staff member thought what they were doing to the kids was righteous and working.  That they were providing a real and valuable service with actual benefits.  And I firmly believe that there are kids who completed these programs and were left with the feeling that they experienced something positive and beneficial.  But what you believe is not always the truth.  But if you believed it worked for you, I can also believe it didn't.  Those kids at Mount Bachelor decided that the program abused them.  The authorities agreed with them.  Nobody claims you have to believe them.  But society places more authority in the position of the State, as opposed to individuals.  And in this case, society has decided Mount Bachelor and its program, the same program (Generally speaking) used at Hilltop, CEDU and RMA, was abuse and of no therapeutic or value as proper counseling.  Even Mount Bachelor admitted in court testimony they never provided no counseling, therapy or treatment.  Which is why when graduated I know talk about how RMA helped them, it's all about things not associated with the program itself.  The program provides nothing.  The isolation produces close friendships.  The isolation generates a setting where drugs and alcohol and partying are mostly absent.  So I contend that the isolation was what produced results, some temporary, some lasting.  Not the program.  Such as it was.

    21
    Facility Question and Answers / Re: The Carlbrook thread
    « on: December 24, 2009, 08:16:23 AM »
    Quote from: "lk"
    Quote
    I'd rather do a month of work details then 2 days in a row of staring at the wall being monitored.

    I'd go apeshit. That's real fucking scary. Tim brace is overseeing that. It's a fucking POW camp. Hell i'd rather be in a 72 hour caroline rap than be told I was on an indefinite stare at the wall program.

    Please elaborate on how you got put on one of those. Was it before or after work details?.

    TWO DAYS??? Try two weeks, minimum. One guy was in there for nine months IN A ROW.

    And a repeat from the other thread:


    about the workshops:
    Is there any role-playing? I mean, something where the staff assigns a character for you to act out?
    Tons. I can't think of it all but there's a bit in every workshop and some in regular groups if you're in a Sally group or an Andy group. In Amicitia, you push people out of the circle of friendship. In Animus, you go to your own funeral/read your obituaries/die/get buried/rise from the dead/etc. You also have to act out your negative sculpture (you know, shooting yourself in the head, having your legs open like a whore, snorting coke, whatever your issue is). You also fight for a spot on the "lifeboats." In Teneo, you go from being born to turning into a rose or something weird like that the last day. Also in Teneo, you have to act out 3 of your "roles" and use people in your peer group as other characters. I can't remember the other bits.

    In the Amicitia, how physical is the circle of exclusion?
    I don't know about other people's experience but in mine it wasn't like kids were getting punched or anything. You know, you'd shove them out and stuff but everyone was pretty half-hearted about it. I don't know, those acting-it-out scenarios never "worked" for me.

    Are there horeshoe-style groups where you only get "feedback"? How harsh does it get?
    Yeah, in the first two workshops. Integritas is the harshest probably. You get "monster," "victim," "pathetic," "worthless," "unlovable," "disgusting," etc written on a card and taped on your shirt. I've heard some really fucked-up feedback in those circles...I'm trying to think of the worst..."cum-dumpster," "n****r-lover," etc...or people just bringing up other people's disclosures and using them against them.

    Are there exercise where you call yourself names? In which you call your parents names?
    I think you kind of call yourself names the whole time with your negative statements, lies, etc. You yell at your parents (aka the floor) in Integritas. You hit/yell at/rage against your parents (aka pillows) in Veneratio.

    In the Animus, what's the "pillow fighting" about? What other bioenergetic exercises are there? Are you ever restrained under a sheet by the group? Do they do the one where you have to bite towel and pull on it?
    Raise arms over head, brings hands down on pillow and sort of make it an entire-body type of exercise. Yell. Fight Night in Teneo is the one where you pull on the towel and scream and push against your peers. No biting though. Can't remember the other bioenergetics.

    They make you watch Requiem for a Dream, right? Other stuff? Under-age kids watching this?
    You watch like the last 10 minutes of RFAD in Veneratio. Most kids are 18 by the time they graduate but some aren't. I heard they recently got rid of that part though because word got out and they didn't want to get in trouble. It was a pretty horrifying 10 minutes...double-headed dildoes assfucking Jennifer Connelly, shock treatment on the old woman...revolting. It was effective, though.

    about request group:
    Do people get called names? Yelled at?

    Not random named. Like you can't call someone an asshole - it has to be "you're ACTING LIKE an asshole." People do get railed a lot though by staff and peers. Sometimes it's in a constructive way, like you can tell they're yelling because they care but sometimes it's just spiteful, angry bullshit.

    How harsh does the "feedback" get?
    Very. There's really no other way to say that. Very, very, very harsh.

    Are people ever supposed to yell out the floor?
    All the time. It's called "running anger."

    about punishments in general
    How often are you supposed to do honor lists? Just in workshops?

    In workshops, before workshops, in suspension, on action plans, if your adviser suspects you've done something bad.

    Do you ever have to do manual labor? If so what kind of work? For how long at a time? Only if you break a major rule, or...?
    Out-of-school suspensioners work with the maintenance crew - gardening, mowing, digging up tree stumps, raking, etc. And of course everyone cleans. Everyone is always effing cleaning. Wake up, clean your dorm, clean your mod. Before you go to sleep, clean your dorm. After dinner, crews either run jugs (deliver water jugs to various locations around campus while carrying them on their backs and running), cleaning the dining hall/kitchen, or running/cleaning the Commons. You get a crew or multiple crews for minor infractions (didn't wear a belt, bra strap showing, messy dorm, disrespect, cutting across the grass, swearing, spitting without asking, leaving a personal item unattended, late homework, talking back to a staff, etc.). Suspension is for more serious things (lying, cheating, etc.) or if you need "time alone to work on your emotions" or whatever.

    And no, we were never restrained by the group with a sheet. The workshops sucked but I don't think they crossed a line. I mean...ugh, it's complicated. I think so much of what went on in there was unnecessary and sometimes damaging but I don't think they did anything ABUSIVE, you know? Like, nothing that was illegal or crazy like those psycho therapists that stage fake birth canals and accidentally smother the kids (does anyone remember that case from a few years ago?).

    I think the problem with workshops is that they're scripted. They're not individualized for the specific kids in the specific workshop. It's like manufacturing 20 extra-large t-shirts for 20 kids. You need to make them extra-large because the kids are all different sizes and this way, every kid will at least have clothing on his back even if he or she is swimming in fabric. It's better than to have a kid not be able to fit in the t-shirt, right? So everyone's wearing these extra-large t-shirts. For some kids, the t-shirts fit fine. For others, it's a little uncomfortable, you know, baggy and annoying but okay. For some, it goes down to their knees and when they go outside, it doesn't protect them from the sun and they have this awful weird-shaped sunburn because of the way the shirt fits and...okay. Never mind. This metaphor sucks. Sorry about this, guys.

    But basically, they're doing a one-size-fits-all workshop when they need to think about what is going to work FOR and WITH the kids in the workshop. They need to spend more time making 20 different t-shirts in the right size for the right kid. The problem with the workshops is that they do EVERYTHING. They know that some kids are visual learners/experiential learners/etc. So they need to reach each kid. So they throw in some acting-it-out exercises, some bioenergetic exercises, some visualizations, some feedback circles, some written-out tools, some lectures, some writing assignments...basically throwing in everything and the kitchen sink because they know that everything won't affect everyone but SOMETHING will affect EVERYONE, you know? So they need to cover all of their bases.

    The problem is that the kids don't know this. They think they're supposed to "get" EVERYTHING. So when they can't connect with something, they think something's wrong with them and fake it and feel like shit. Or, worse, they try to FORCE themselves to do it, to feel it, and end up breaking themselves a little bit. Or the staff try to force it and break something. It's just bad.

    Sorry, I sound like an idiot. But hopefully you get what I'm saying.

    Quote from: "lk"
    Quote
    I'd rather do a month of work details then 2 days in a row of staring at the wall being monitored.

    I'd go apeshit. That's real fucking scary. Tim brace is overseeing that. It's a fucking POW camp. Hell i'd rather be in a 72 hour caroline rap than be told I was on an indefinite stare at the wall program.

    Please elaborate on how you got put on one of those. Was it before or after work details?.

    TWO DAYS??? Try two weeks, minimum. One guy was in there for nine months IN A ROW.

    And a repeat from the other thread:


    about the workshops:
    Is there any role-playing? I mean, something where the staff assigns a character for you to act out?
    Tons. I can't think of it all but there's a bit in every workshop and some in regular groups if you're in a Sally group or an Andy group. In Amicitia, you push people out of the circle of friendship. In Animus, you go to your own funeral/read your obituaries/die/get buried/rise from the dead/etc. You also have to act out your negative sculpture (you know, shooting yourself in the head, having your legs open like a whore, snorting coke, whatever your issue is). You also fight for a spot on the "lifeboats." In Teneo, you go from being born to turning into a rose or something weird like that the last day. Also in Teneo, you have to act out 3 of your "roles" and use people in your peer group as other characters. I can't remember the other bits.

    In the Amicitia, how physical is the circle of exclusion?
    I don't know about other people's experience but in mine it wasn't like kids were getting punched or anything. You know, you'd shove them out and stuff but everyone was pretty half-hearted about it. I don't know, those acting-it-out scenarios never "worked" for me.

    Are there horeshoe-style groups where you only get "feedback"? How harsh does it get?
    Yeah, in the first two workshops. Integritas is the harshest probably. You get "monster," "victim," "pathetic," "worthless," "unlovable," "disgusting," etc written on a card and taped on your shirt. I've heard some really fucked-up feedback in those circles...I'm trying to think of the worst..."cum-dumpster," "n****r-lover," etc...or people just bringing up other people's disclosures and using them against them.

    Are there exercise where you call yourself names? In which you call your parents names?
    I think you kind of call yourself names the whole time with your negative statements, lies, etc. You yell at your parents (aka the floor) in Integritas. You hit/yell at/rage against your parents (aka pillows) in Veneratio.

    In the Animus, what's the "pillow fighting" about? What other bioenergetic exercises are there? Are you ever restrained under a sheet by the group? Do they do the one where you have to bite towel and pull on it?
    Raise arms over head, brings hands down on pillow and sort of make it an entire-body type of exercise. Yell. Fight Night in Teneo is the one where you pull on the towel and scream and push against your peers. No biting though. Can't remember the other bioenergetics.

    They make you watch Requiem for a Dream, right? Other stuff? Under-age kids watching this?
    You watch like the last 10 minutes of RFAD in Veneratio. Most kids are 18 by the time they graduate but some aren't. I heard they recently got rid of that part though because word got out and they didn't want to get in trouble. It was a pretty horrifying 10 minutes...double-headed dildoes assfucking Jennifer Connelly, shock treatment on the old woman...revolting. It was effective, though.

    about request group:
    Do people get called names? Yelled at?

    Not random named. Like you can't call someone an asshole - it has to be "you're ACTING LIKE an asshole." People do get railed a lot though by staff and peers. Sometimes it's in a constructive way, like you can tell they're yelling because they care but sometimes it's just spiteful, angry bullshit.

    How harsh does the "feedback" get?
    Very. There's really no other way to say that. Very, very, very harsh.

    Are people ever supposed to yell out the floor?
    All the time. It's called "running anger."

    about punishments in general
    How often are you supposed to do honor lists? Just in workshops?

    In workshops, before workshops, in suspension, on action plans, if your adviser suspects you've done something bad.

    Do you ever have to do manual labor? If so what kind of work? For how long at a time? Only if you break a major rule, or...?
    Out-of-school suspensioners work with the maintenance crew - gardening, mowing, digging up tree stumps, raking, etc. And of course everyone cleans. Everyone is always effing cleaning. Wake up, clean your dorm, clean your mod. Before you go to sleep, clean your dorm. After dinner, crews either run jugs (deliver water jugs to various locations around campus while carrying them on their backs and running), cleaning the dining hall/kitchen, or running/cleaning the Commons. You get a crew or multiple crews for minor infractions (didn't wear a belt, bra strap showing, messy dorm, disrespect, cutting across the grass, swearing, spitting without asking, leaving a personal item unattended, late homework, talking back to a staff, etc.). Suspension is for more serious things (lying, cheating, etc.) or if you need "time alone to work on your emotions" or whatever.

    And no, we were never restrained by the group with a sheet. The workshops sucked but I don't think they crossed a line. I mean...ugh, it's complicated. I think so much of what went on in there was unnecessary and sometimes damaging but I don't think they did anything ABUSIVE, you know? Like, nothing that was illegal or crazy like those psycho therapists that stage fake birth canals and accidentally smother the kids (does anyone remember that case from a few years ago?).

    I think the problem with workshops is that they're scripted. They're not individualized for the specific kids in the specific workshop. It's like manufacturing 20 extra-large t-shirts for 20 kids. You need to make them extra-large because the kids are all different sizes and this way, every kid will at least have clothing on his back even if he or she is swimming in fabric. It's better than to have a kid not be able to fit in the t-shirt, right? So everyone's wearing these extra-large t-shirts. For some kids, the t-shirts fit fine. For others, it's a little uncomfortable, you know, baggy and annoying but okay. For some, it goes down to their knees and when they go outside, it doesn't protect them from the sun and they have this awful weird-shaped sunburn because of the way the shirt fits and...okay. Never mind. This metaphor sucks. Sorry about this, guys.

    But basically, they're doing a one-size-fits-all workshop when they need to think about what is going to work FOR and WITH the kids in the workshop. They need to spend more time making 20 different t-shirts in the right size for the right kid. The problem with the workshops is that they do EVERYTHING. They know that some kids are visual learners/experiential learners/etc. So they need to reach each kid. So they throw in some acting-it-out exercises, some bioenergetic exercises, some visualizations, some feedback circles, some written-out tools, some lectures, some writing assignments...basically throwing in everything and the kitchen sink because they know that everything won't affect everyone but SOMETHING will affect EVERYONE, you know? So they need to cover all of their bases.

    The problem is that the kids don't know this. They think they're supposed to "get" EVERYTHING. So when they can't connect with something, they think something's wrong with them and fake it and feel like shit. Or, worse, they try to FORCE themselves to do it, to feel it, and end up breaking themselves a little bit. Or the staff try to force it and break something. It's just bad.

    Sorry, I sound like an idiot. But hopefully you get what I'm saying.

    What I get is that this is RMA/CEDU/Mount Bachelor.  Same stuff, different names.  

    The original post seemed to be about what Carlbrook is about, with many suggestions that it is a CEDU spin off.  Clearly this is the case.  Not just a spin off but with the same actors.  Tim Brace was at CEDU, then RMA, then Mount Bachelor and now Carlbrook.  So it shouldn't be too surprising that the same stuff Tim Brace used elsewhere, he brought with him to use at Carlbrook.  

    The above poster is listing off what went on in the "Propheets, Workshops and Raps" at CEDU/RMA.  The same stuff that was derived from Synanon, EST and LifeSpring that Mel Wasserman, the founder of the CEDU schools stole for his own use.

    Earlier in the thread some names were thrown out.  Glenn Bender, Lon Woodbury, Doug Kim-Brown and of course, Tim Brace.  All were at Rocky Mountain Academy (RMA) in the 80's.  When I attended RMA in 1984, Glenn Bender gave me my strip search and was the director of admissions.  If he ever had anything to do with the academics, I knew nothing of that.  He might have assigned students their classes.  Lon Woodbury had an office on campus.  He was selling himself out to parents as a completely neutral and independent placement consultant, yet had his office on campus and just as he was then, today he still touts himself as being independent.  Doug Kim-Brown transferred to RMA from CEDU in 1984-85.  He was quickly in charge of running a mid-level "family", doing group therapy and running propheets and workshops.  Back then he was fairly milquetoast and quiet, though later he became much louder and abusive.  Tim Brace was always an emotional basket case who loved young boys in the literal sense.  He did indeed like taking young boys to his personal residence or office for some quiet one-on-one smushing and affection.  And he told the same story about sucking cock for money quite often.  Usually any propheet he was running and quite a number of raps.  And he copped to some serious criminal activity as well as heavy drug usage.  

    It sounds like Carlbrook had the exact same abusive and humiliating "raps" as we did.  AT RMA/CEDU you wrote out rap requests, got called to raps, sat in a circle of chairs, had to switch seats to be across the room for indictments, and most indictments were generally petty, loud and abusive.  People were called names, degraded, made to cry.  Crying was basically the single-best way to get an indictment to stop.  As though making you cry was a victory.  Girls were routinely called sluts, whores, pieces of meat and worse.  If a girl had any sexual activity in her background, she was screwed from start to finish.  We were made to run our anger, either towards someone, or sometimes a person in the room would simply act as a surrogate parent so you could yell at them, but just as often we yelled at the floor or a Kleenex box.  

    RMA/CEDU had the same one-size fits-all program style.  Everyone got the exact same treatment/therapy/counseling/raps/propheets.  All students were made to feel equally horrible about their pasts despite huge differences.  Practically everyone was told at one time or another that they would win up deal or in jail if they left the program even though virtually no students (When I was there) were suicidal or criminals.  But because students were often compelled to cop to increasingly worse and worse things about their lives, most of which were untrue and never happened, but just to get the heat off or look good, staff may have believed they were one step from the grave or prison.  But more likely they just like saying dead or in jail because it is mean spirited.

    It also sounds like Carlbrook had the same no-boundaries "affection" and "touching" as RMA/CEDU.  I imagine you smushed together on the floor, leaning up against each other, hugging often, etc.  And that not participating was considered being "resistant" and could get you indicted in raps or punished in some way.  

    Carlbrook seems to have many of the cruel and unusual punishments RMA/CEDU had.  Endless days spent staring at a wall and doing writing assignments to disclose past wrong doings.  Often made up by students so it looked like they were being honest, because to say you hadn't done anything else besides what you were being immediately punished for would never, and was never believed.  And of course all punishments included manual labor.  

    Another issue was the interaction with therapists.  When I was at CEDU/RMA in the 80's, they didn't have actual psychologist with degrees and credentials.  Apparently in the 90's they wised up and generally found the least qualified people to fill these positions who would be content to get paid and not actually participate directly in the programs.  Or ask any questions about the programs either.  Just the least curious person possible.   In my day, the untrained staff were all you got. And from what Mount Bachelor disclosed when they were recently shut down, their "real" therapist had no understanding of what went on in the program, saw students rarely, and really had no routine contact with students unless parents specifically asked for that.  And of course paid through the nose for it.  So basically they were there so their sign on the door could be seen by parents who would say, "Look, they have a real trained psychologist on staff."  All of the programs who claim to have a real shrink seem to not use that shrink in the program much.  

    Carlbrook does appear to use all the same terminology as RMA/CEDU/Mount Bachelor, but with some different names.  Not surprising.  And this is done to make discussing the programs outside of the program with non-program members incredibly difficult.  Most police officers and child protective services people would probably consider you a bit off-balance if you started explaining what you were forced to go through and endure, using the terminology from your program.  Stumps would be easy to explain, but just saying stumps would get a blank stare in response.  The word propheet doesn't mean anything to anyone.  Cults need their own language, not just to make the program seem more special to the participants, but also to make it harder to describe to authorities.  Because they will be telling the authorities you are a problem teen with a great deal of emotional and mental issues, and talking nonsense won't help you at all when you start spouting off with Honor Lists (Which sounds great, wish my kid was on the Honor List) and Veneratio which is not a real word.  It just doesn't translate well.  And not just to authorities, but also to parents.  Your parents are already exhausted dealing with you by the time they send you there.  So when you cry out for help and they try and listen to you, if you sound like you are saying, "Yo momma, you shizzle is fo dope in my hommies hot spot."  Parents eyes glaze over, they have no clue what you are saying, lose interest and just hope you stay and do the program.  They won't hear, "Mom, dad...This place is a cult!  They are using attack therapy, based on Synanon, LifeSpring and EST to get me to disclose things I never did by using group peer pressure utilizing humiliation and verbal abuse.  I feel very uncomfortable that I cannot communicate with you any time I need to, or that you cannot communicate with me any time you need to, and that the little we do get to communicate with each other is strictly monitored..."  Kids don't get this far with mom and dad.  And their vocabulary is so messed up by the cult, they really can't clearly explain things.  And by the time they leave, it's too late.  Twenty five years later my parents still can't accept that the program was bad.  And I am quite capable of describing exactly what went on in the most clear and concise of language.  And this is why the cults/programs can get away with it.  By the time you'd be able to describe the abuse, afford to bring a lawsuit, odds are the statute of limitations is long past.  And who would believe you?

    Bans was also a CEDU/RMA/Mount Bachelor product.  Pulls up by students was common. Ratting out on friends was encouraged, even by fellow students.  You could get put on bans for not ratting on your friends often enough to please everyone.  Students were not allowed to put anyone on bans, though on occasion students would recommend and staff would agree, especially if the suggestion was made by an older student.  And older students were most often the most abusive of the students in raps.  However no student outdid any of the power staff.  Most students were reluctant to indict in raps, but once someone did, usually a "look good" everyone jumped in who had two brain cells working because keeping the heat on someone else was better than it possibly turning on you.  And this is where "needs" came from.  Taking it out on someone else, saying anything, true or not just to keep the heat on someone else.  It wasn't personal, it was survival, and nearly everyone did it.  Bans were also very arbitrary.  I had a staff walk by on Christmas Eve and place me on bans from my closest friends, with no explanation, while gifts were being handed out.  And then just walked away.  People from CEDU have described abusive staff walking up while people appear to be enjoying themselves and ordering someone to go sit somewhere and do writing assignments, for no reason except that they had such power.  Such actions scared students.  It made you constantly question innocent activities.  You might ask you friend, "Are we spending too much time together?  We were smushing yesterday and I think we ate breakfast together, so maybe we should go find someone else to hang out with just so we don't get put on bans."  Because bans could last months.  If the staff who put you on bans can't remember how long you've been on them, they could say no just because they think you haven't been banned the "minimum" length of time.  Or they just might not like you and keep them going.  Because they had that power.  

    So I am going to cast my vote and say Carlbrook is a CEDU/RMA/Mount Bachelor clone.  Some minor alterations, but basically the exact same abusive and humiliating program run, naturally, by the same untrained and abusive staff who ran all the other programs.  In real life they call it Six Degrees of Separation.  When it comes to these programs, it is closer to Two Degrees.  If you don't know this phrase, it means everyone you meet, even total strangers, if they were to list everyone they have ever met, basically they have met someone, who knew someone, who knew someone else, who knows you.  Or is related to you.  In the Troubled Teen Industry, it only takes knowing a couple of staff before someone says, "Hey, they were at my school too!"  

    Happy Holidays everyone!

    22
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: What about
    « on: December 24, 2009, 04:16:53 AM »
    Yes.  He arrived to be the cook about six to eight months after I got there.  Went from cook to counselor in no time.  I remember he tried to explain physics to some students one day while I was standing there.  Guy was a complete imbecile.  I was asked by several students who wanted to actually graduate with real credits they might use to get in to or to help them in college if I would teach Physics, Trig and Calculus to them since RMA at the time had Algebra as the top class.  I doubt Rookie would have qualified to be in any of those classes.  

    All he really did was manage the kitchen staff.  It was the women who came up with the recipes.  He just ordered the food and bossed everyone around.  Spent most of his time outside smoking behind the kitchen.  I worked in the kitchen in New Horizons and Summit, even Challenge I think, I have no memories of actually watching him cook anything.  He tried to show off his chopping skills with a knife one day and cut himself.  Needless to say, I wasn't impressed.  So you could add inept to imbecile as descriptive words for this fool.  And fool too.  To think he now runs his own program is a frightening thought.  But it goes hand in hand with this industry that people with no credentials, no education, no background outside of programs, get hired to be cooks, or help with manual labor like showing kids how to chop wood, go on to be counselors, staff, escort/bounty hunters, and even starting their own programs.

    23
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: What about
    « on: December 24, 2009, 02:20:16 AM »
    Tim Brace was originally at CEDU, a school founded and based on the Synanon, EST and LIfeSpring Cults.  He then went to the other CEDU school called RMA in Bonners Ferry, Idaho.  I was at RMA during his time there as the director.  The stuff he admitted to doing in his past was criminal and horrible and I didn't get the impression he had changed.

    Mount Bachelor Academy was started by CEDU/RMA staff.  Tim was just one of them.  MBA used the same cult system CEDU/RMA were based off of.  Isolating kids, barring open and non-supervised communication with the outside world, banning people from speaking to others, forced labor, humiliating group therapy sessions full of screaming abusive insults at each other and peculiar workshops utilizing sleep deprivation, hot/cold temperature control, blaring loud and repetitive music while coercing kids to divulge information about themselves.  

    MBA, like CEDU/RMA before, were eventually shut down.  Investigations determined that the program and it's systematic abuse of teens, the humiliations inflicted upon them, that unlicensed and untrained staff were performing unlicensed therapy based on principles proven to be damaging to people were illegal and/or unethical and they revoked their license.  Tim Brace was a part of creating these programs.  A part of the abuse.  No amount of hugging or other uninvited physical contact such as smooshing can reduce the criminal behavior of Tim Brace and the other people involved in such practices.

    You asked if there was proof any of it was illegal?  Odds are strong that if Tim Brace is involved with Carlbrook, many of the same practices that were found to be illegal at Mount Bachelor Academy, that got CEDU/RMA shut down from lawsuits and criminal investigations are probably evident at Carlbrook as well.  Thus it is likely Carlbrook could be shut down if investigated.

    Many of the posters on this site are not recent graduated.  Some are.  But like myself, we graduated programs twenty or more years ago.  It can take years to recognize that you have been abused.  Cults have a way of making you believe that what you took part in was good for you and everyone else.  There is a time when you "wake up" and that often doesn't happen to those are who still 18-22.  It requires a certain self-reflection that is different than the type the program teaches.  A level of personal honesty to be able to question what you went through and see it objectively.  When I was 18, I didn't think twice about the raps and propheets, the strange exercises we had to endure.  I did it, I graduated, I left.  But at the age of 41, I can look back at what went on, what we did and I have the education and knowledge to make a neutral decision about it all.  I am old enough to be able to recognize what it abuse, what is right, what is wrong, what is helpful, what is not.   Society calls this wisdom.  And on hindsight, I can say unequivocally that CEDU/RMA were abusive and cruel programs with little merit, and that what I know of Mount Bachelor tells me it was the same.  And that because Tim Brace worked at these programs, and now works at Carlbrook, and that because Carlbrook uses many of the same practices, that Carlbrook is also abusive and cruel.  No different than the other programs Tim Brace was associated with.

    24
    CEDU / Brown Schools and derivatives / clones / Re: DOJ Inquiry
    « on: December 23, 2009, 11:58:47 PM »
    Guilty knowledge perhaps?  You can't assume they were just saying it was Gina to mess with you.  It is possible they knew someone had run away and never located and might have assumed themselves that it was her.  Or they might have known she died, possibly not reporting that to authorities.  

    When I was at RMA, we had kids who split and never turned up anywhere.  One supposedly made it to Germany of all places.  Or so we were told... How would they know where he wound up?  If he was a teenager and ran away, and they knew he was in Germany, wouldn't they be required to notify authorities?

    I am just saying, I think CEDU/RMA may have had knowledge of things, maybe not perfect knowledge, but enough to draw conclusions.  We all know that when you ran away, they had the local police and even escorts hunt you down to bring you back, because you were worth more to them on campus.  But we also know that staff routinely had sex with, and even molested students and I don't think it is too far-fetched that a student or two might have "disappeared" and that everyone was told they ran away.  But, that the staff may have known otherwise.  It was a cult after all.  They knew many of the things they did were illegal.  They all played the same games, and I just think telling everyone that every student ran away, on their own accord, is a very handy excuse.  

    The bones might not have been Gina's, but CEDU may have thought they were for many reasons.  Did Gina ever turn up?

    25
    Aspen Education Group / Re: Checkmate
    « on: December 12, 2009, 04:36:32 AM »
    She might have meant people with screen names and not Guests.  Or even one-timers.  Those you can build something with.  Those perhaps, who don't need to post anonymously?  That was my take on it.

    26
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: Cataloging TheWho/John Reuben's Lies
    « on: December 12, 2009, 01:48:41 AM »
    The Dentist office would probably also be licensed, the Dentist having gone to college to get a degree in the field.   The Dentist would perform the Dental work, the assistants would not be performing work requiring a Dentist license.  Poor analogy.  But expected.

    27
    What a surprise.  More Guests posting hate material or just anything really to detract from real topics.  I''l just keep adding to this thread so it stays on top.

    But why waste the time?  Let's chat about something.  How about whether New Orleans can go undefeated?  Or the Colts?

    28
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: Cataloging TheWho/John Reuben's Lies
    « on: December 09, 2009, 09:49:30 PM »
    Arguments go downhill once the homophobic slander comes in to play.  Let's have a debate, but a clean one.  There are plenty of people on this site who are part of the gay or lesbian community, let's not be insulting to them.  There's plenty of foul language available, no need to use the foulest.

    29
    The Troubled Teen Industry / Re: Cataloging TheWho/John Reuben's Lies
    « on: December 09, 2009, 04:09:32 PM »
    This is my point.  It's like we're now trying to convince ourselves that Whooter is an industry player?  Why did we need this proved?  Why do we need to be convinced again?  Maybe a long time ago people might have still been wondering, but not today.  He is clearly a shill.  I can't see anyone coming to this site and coming away thinking any differently.  I just don't see the value in trying to prove he is one, or that he is John Reuben or anyone else.  A shill is a shill.  If his shilling was done in a good light, with legitimate remarks, wise comments, lots of profound insight, even friendly, maybe that would be something else and visitors to this site might think he is a good and decent person.  But he doesn't.  And I don't think anyone would read his posts and come away thinking anything other than that he is a shill and a bad one at that.  That he causes more damage to the industry he represents every single time he posts.  He helps our cause.  He is probably the best free and replenishing resource we have on this site.  His abusive behavior, twisted logic, avoidance of direct answers is what we want people to see about the industry as a whole.  This is the sort of person who lures parents in to sending their kids away with false hopes and false promises.  Lying and deceiving them in to thinking there is legitimate therapy and counseling to be had at these programs.  Getting them to believe there are well trained staff working there.  When they see how deceptive and abusive he is here, they will be less likely to send their kids...there.  And they will see that he is all about where the money is.  Not about helping kids.  His abusive language here, his laughing at the tragic stories told by survivors, is just endless proof of how truly sick the people in this industry are.  They sincerely believe that humiliating people and abusing them is good for them.  And parents will see this.  And they will decide for themselves whether they want their child involved with such people.  

    But as much as I find the effort to prove something a waste of time, I don't knock the thread itself.  The more we get Whooter to talk and post, the better it is for us over all.  Everything he says is just so amazingly dumb, full of anger, abuse and sadism that people seeing what he is about, what the industry is about, can only help us.  Got to love free advertising.

    30
    I haven't smelled that new car smell in too long.  They should make scratch and sniffs with it.

    Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14