« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to  (Read 5845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2005, 07:28:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-04-27 16:17:00, Watchaduen wrote:

"I noticed on the P.U.R.E. website that all the WWASP negative stuff is gone.  Did Sue take all that down because of the lawsuit?  I thought she won.
"


http://helpyourteens.com/true_story.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #16 on: April 28, 2005, 01:05:00 AM »
That's strange, still posting all that nasty stuff about WWASP, and here it seemed Sue Scheff was all friendly, friendly with Bob Litchfield as he torments Shelby over at ISAC. Confusing, huh?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2005, 11:12:00 AM »
New girl enrolled at Whitmore Academy last week from Long Island, N.Y.  Wonder if this is a Sue Scheff referral? Sudweeks still being investigated for child abuse and fraud, etc. Really sad situation, new kids showing up in this mess!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2005, 09:46:00 PM »
Someone posted on the Whitmore site that 15 of those kids are "graduating" in May. Those ed cons better get busy and fill up that place---give Sue Scheff some competition; but then again, maybe they won't refer to the "cash cow" while the Sudweeks are under investigation for child abuse.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Joyce Harris

  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2005, 04:20:00 PM »
Please read: WHO AM I DISCOVERY...Topic: "Tweek & Peek don't like state's "therapeutic" label."

Perhaps since the Sudweeks now claim they don't even offer therapy to any of the kids at Whitmore, Ms. Scheff just won't find any need to send any more kids to Whitmore Academy!!! Whew, what a relief!  And if SHE stops sending kids there...well it should just close down.

Read carefully...Utah's DCFS reports 8 counts of substantiated abuse and neglect.

And the Sudweeks have been cited with NUMEROUS fire code violations..and must have someone keep FIRE WATCH over the building from 7PM until 7AM.

Now surely Sue Scheff wouldn't even want to send a child into that unsafe environment now would she?  Hope IF Sue's the one who just referred that little girl from Long Island, NY to Whitmore, that Sue's on the phone with those parents finding a new school that DOES offer therapy, and that PROBABLY won't burn down...and hopefully won't abuse the kid either.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #20 on: May 01, 2005, 02:05:00 AM »
Think Sue Scheff and PURE will continue to refer to Whitmore?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #21 on: May 01, 2005, 09:22:00 PM »
The Sudweeks say they are out of the teen-help business. Hmmmm guess Sue Scheff won't need to refer troubled teens to the Whitmore any longer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #22 on: May 02, 2005, 07:57:00 PM »
Hear a new ed con out of California is milking the cash cow called Whitmore!!! Guess having the owners accused of child abuse is just no big deal to some of these ed cons.
 Mark Sudweeks announcing in the TRIBUNE article he's "out of the teen help business" may dry things up.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2005, 06:33:00 PM »
Hope that is true about Whitmore...one less school to worry about.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2005, 01:09:00 AM »
Before being referred by PURE...maybe you should read the Who Am I Discovery FIRST!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Sue Scheff: Did WWASP v PURE Win Mean "Freedom of Speech" to
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2005, 01:10:00 AM »
Have you read WHO AM I DISCOVERY?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »