One consistent theme I have noticed about the supporters of this program is that they are more than happy to engage in nonsensical arguments about people's sexuality, guessing identities, bashing, etc.
However, they totally and completely avoidany legitimate questions about their own behavior, policy, "discrepencies" between marketing materials and actual practice, sex offenses by employees, or any other serious topic of discussion.
For someone looking for real answers to these serious questions, it seems like a tacit admission to these transgressions.
I also noticed that their own message board, discusshla.com, is actually not any type of discussion whatsoever. The editor deletes any and all discussion about the negative aspects of the program to try to make it appear as if there is actually nobody who has ever been dissatisfied with their program. It seems just to be a marketing tool to advertise, not discuss anything.
If the program is so great, why shut off all dissenting comment? It looks to the outside observer like the administartion is a bunch of baby Stalinists.