Dame SLee, I just have to ask -
What about this:
//"Ok, I can't help myself. I'm bumping the most idiotic topic started today (and that's saying something)
But I have to know, anon, is Karen an emotional dummy or a schemer capable of sophisticated machination. And do you honestly believe that everybody in the world loves Sue except for the couple of ppl at ISAC? If you ain't got a horse in this race (which I find unlikely) then you are being played for a fool. Worse? A damned fool. //
Leads you to conclude (wrongly) this:
// I wasn't even aware, until you posted this message, that Karen was the same person who wrote all of the posts which resulted in what you are suggesting are conflicting replies. So, it is interesting to know she was posting as herself and many others. //
As for this:
//she writes combative, sarcastic posts to invalidate the thoughts of another person. //
What I wrote was not intended to be combative or sarcastic. I had a legitimate question based on private conversation. YOU wouldn't know diddly squat about it, and its YOU who is being sarcastic and combative.
And this:
// Karen seems to have a habit of imposing her belief system, values and her religion on everyone at Fornits when it suits her. //
Now how on God's green Earth can I impose what I believe on anyone here? This (like so much coming from you lately)is just plain stupid. I make it a point, not to make what I believe an issue, unless someone else brings it up. Youse others Do make it a point to frequently bring it up - So, it does get mentioned - but not b/c *I* am making it an issue.
And this:
// you, oh Great One, Christine, Marti the nomad, Shannon, Karen, Shelby and her loser husband are running in a pack right now. //
So, is this the complete enemy of SLee list, or do you anticapate amendments?