Honestly, I probably wouldn't do a thing.
Sorry if that makes me a bad person.
I just wouldn't know if the kid being transported was actually dangerous to himself or others. What if I helped the kid get loose and and he went right out and threw himself under a train? Or went off and killed somebody?
No, the way I've decided to try to deal with this is to try to reason with parents that I encounter who have their kids in programs or are considering programs to get the parents to do the kind of reasonable checks that will tell them if a particular program is really bad news. And I try to talk with parents to help them explore any options less restrictive than lockup programs that they maybe didn't know were out there and hadn't tried yet. And I try to encourage parents to avoid placing their kid in a program that is inappropriate for that child.
Beyond that, I'm trying to build a grassroots groundswell to get the laws that need to be changed changed, and to see that the laws that need to be enforced get the penalties, enforcement agency tasking, and funding to actually get that enforcement done.
Sorry if it's a bad thing, but I *wouldn't* just jump into a situation and assault somebody based on my personal prejudices. You never know what you're really looking at when a situation comes at you suddenly like that, and jumping to conclusions can not only get you in huge legal trouble, it could seriously, irreparably harm innocent people.
I'm less of a direct action kind of person and more oriented towards changing hearts and minds and laws and implementation/enforcement of laws.
*You* may be sane, but *I* am certified nuts.
I would be too afraid I was unstable that day and missing cues that would tell a sane person that what I was about to do was a *very bad idea*. And I would be *right* to be that afraid.
So I personally avoid direct action in favor of working on people's opinions, conveying information, and working on fixing the rules.
Timoclea