Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore
Breaking news
Anonymous:
Hmm, even more credible infromation in defense of The Whitmore's wonderful influence on it's boarders. Keep it up, it only makes the case stronger against you. Remember you never know WHO might be reading this site. You and those trying to defend The Whitmore are losing ground each and every day. Ironically, you are doing it to yourselves and making those in opposition look more and more credible with each posting you make!I really think at this point, as a parent, I don't need to say anymore. You and the others have accomplished exacly what I knew you would.
Joyce Harris:
I stated on my first post on fornits Dec 2004 that I can stand up for myself, and that lies told about me would be exposed.
The topic on this site The Truth Will Prevail has verifed who lies.
We do not have a "shady" past or present.
Insinuating that we do does nothing to deflect the fact that the Sudweeks are the people being investigated for allegations of child abuse, fraud, etc.
Joyce Harris:
I might add:
That you speaking for the Sudweeks' cause, and making fun of a litttle 12 year old girl's physical characteristics, probably does not do a whole lot to help them.
We voiced our strong displeasure with this little girl being made up like a "Jezabel" at Whitmore.
Now just why do you think this was going on?
Anonymous:
my comment was not to defend anyone or any facility.
nor did i mention a minor child's features or dress code. i've never seen either and don't disgrace children.
all i said; was that to date we are only hearing the "harris" version of this story.
it would be interesting to hear the sudweeks saga? i haven't heard it yet, other than hearsay and excerts on this board. apparently, they don't frequent this site OR don't want their story told on a public forum.
the comment i made directed at your past could be; sunny, shady, rainy or any other for that matter. i mentioned "shady" just to get a response. everyone has something they don't particulary like to get out, but it happens. fact of life...
if whitmore IS guilty then bring them down by all means. file a law suit against them now, don't just file reports with the locals. close their doors for good. BUT if this all happened 3 months ago and they are still operating; the authorities MUST not have found any incriminating evidence to close them? or they could be untouchable like wwasps , OJ and MJ?
Anonymous:
the authorities MUST not have found any incriminating evidence to close them?
They lost there license, didn't they? As I understand it, that takes some doing. But of corse, their in Utah, so a license is not needed for business as usual to continue. However, they are still under investigation, aren't they? Who knows what all may take place as a result?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version