Author Topic: Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II  (Read 14774 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #45 on: January 08, 2005, 04:40:00 PM »
Thanks for the information, Ginger. To the anonymous poster I would point out that my first post was at 4:47 PM (local time) on the day of the verdict, which was announced at noon. My vote was based soley on evidence I heard in the trial, period. As far as Charles Long being qualified...I stated my opinion. You don't have to agree with me any more than I do you. My opinion is based on the testimony I heard. If Long was qualifed, I am sure the defense would have produced such evidence (which they didn't).
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline EricasMom

  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #46 on: January 10, 2005, 03:31:00 PM »
Charles Long will be sentenced Feb. 22.  Please write letters requesting that he be sentenced to the maximum sentence allowed by law for the reckless manslaughter death of Tony Haynes and the aggravated assault of another child in his care.

refer to:

Charles F. Long CA2001027941

Send to:

Judge Ronald S Reinstein
Maricopa Superior Court
201 West Jefferson
Phoenix AZ 85003


Thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline juror15

  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #47 on: January 14, 2005, 08:34:00 PM »
And the other 3 DI's charged in this case go to trial on February 2.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #48 on: January 14, 2005, 08:37:00 PM »
Thank you juror.  I appreciate the insight into the trial and for the updates.  It's nice to know the good guys win every once in a while. :smile:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline juror15

  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #49 on: January 14, 2005, 09:56:00 PM »
For those that don't know, DI means drill instructor. And there were some out of control drill instructors at the Buffalo Soldiers (or BS, as I like to call it!;)) boot camp. Hopefully their trial will move faster than the trial of Charles Long!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #50 on: January 21, 2005, 02:47:00 PM »
I just heard on the local news here in Phoenix that a juror is saying they were forced to give a guily plea in this case.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #51 on: January 21, 2005, 02:54:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-01-21 11:47:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I just heard on the local news here in Phoenix that a juror is saying they were forced to give a guily plea in this case."

guilty verdict

/sorry, couldn't help myself.  no harm intended. :razz:

juror 15 disagrees:

Quote
Posted: 2005-01-03 14:47:00  
I was one of the jurors on this case. I am choosing to post this as an anonymous post because I really haven't decided whether or not to talk to the press. I came home today with mixed feelings, and did a search to see what there was out there that I didn't know. I came across this forum, and felt compelled to add a post. While MANY of us would have been happier with a 2nd degree murder conviction, I am just happy we were able to not be a hung jury on this count! Having a mistrial declared on counts 2-9 was horrible! But it only takes one person.... I am glad this is over with, and I hope our verdicts do something to help prevent more of this abuse! The prosecution did a tremendous job. A lot of the articles that are linked from AZCentral don't give an accurate account of what happened in the courtroom.

Quote
Posted: 2005-01-03 17:23:00  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Thank you for your kind words. This is the hardest thing I have ever gone through, and I know my fellow jurors feel the same. We had one juror who had an agenda all her own (refered to Long as "Chuck!!), so I am thankful we were able to accomplish what we did.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #52 on: January 21, 2005, 03:22:00 PM »
Thank you for explaining this to me. I guess it's the juror with their own aganda. BTW Great job on this case. It's about time someone is held accountable for a wrongful death concerning children in these so called treatment centers.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #54 on: January 22, 2005, 08:03:00 PM »
wah, wah, wah.
what do you say juror 15?
sounds like this woman had NO business serving on a jury.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #55 on: January 22, 2005, 11:03:00 PM »
What do I think? I think this just proves what I stated before; she had an agenda. If not, why didn't she go to the judge after the trial? Instead, she ran to the defense team the next day. We didn't want to look at evidence? We spent 3 MONTHS looking at evidence! The evidence comes into the jury room in case you need to refer to it. It isn't mandatory that you re-read every piece. But we did look at the evidence, which just convinced us more of his guilt. She is the one that said in the jury room "I quit listening after Hutty testified. If he isn't going to jail The Colonel shouldn't either. She says we pressured her? Then why didn't she feel pressured to vote guilty on the 8 counts of child abuse? She was able to hold her ground there, we just said fine, then we're hung. She knew this might be a way to get off or get him a new trial.
Justice....is there such a thing? We'll see.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline EricasMom

  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #56 on: April 09, 2005, 07:45:00 PM »
Chuck had three hearings and yesterday was denied a new trial.  Which means that those of you who want to speak out for Tony Haynes still can: write sentencing letters asking that Charles Long be sentenced to the maximum penalty allowed under the law for the reckless manslaughter death of Tony Haynes. Sentencing is May 24.

refer to:

Charles F. Long CA2001027941

Send to:

Judge Ronald S Reinstein
Maricopa Superior Court
201 West Jefferson
Phoenix AZ 85003


Thank you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline nite owl

  • Posts: 159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #57 on: April 10, 2005, 09:41:00 AM »
Do you have an e-mail address for him? This would be better for most.  When is the hearing for sentencing?

Education is that which remains, if one has forgotten everything he learned in school.
--Albert Einstein, Out of My Later Years, 1950

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #58 on: April 10, 2005, 11:27:00 AM »
Quote
On 2005-01-08 08:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"The Juror said: Maybe it will help bring attention to the fact that people need to think before handing over control of their kids to unqualified strangers."





Did the judge also say you were free to air your opinions on a hate forum? From what you said above, I absolutely do not believe that you didn't do some surfing during the trial and that spilled over into your decision or was discussed amongst the other jurors. Isn't there something about "influencing" the jury?  Parents do think about handing over control to unqualified strangers....does that include friends?



Unfortunately Mr. Long WAS qualified.   "


What do you mean he "WAS qualified"?  Did he have a resume stating that he had previous experience torture-murdering children...?

You're fucking sick.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline EricasMom

  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Updates Re: Murder Trial of Chuck Long II
« Reply #59 on: April 10, 2005, 03:56:00 PM »
Quote
On 2005-04-10 06:41:00, nite owl wrote:

"Do you have an e-mail address for him? This would be better for most.  When is the hearing for sentencing?<


Sorry, but no e-mail to my best knowledge.  There is no hearing, just sentence will be given on May 24.  It's probably best to get the sentencing letters to Judge Reinstein ASAP.   Here in AZ, where victim's rights are fairly well represented) judges DO pay attention to those letters at sentencing and then again in clemency hearings down the road.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »