Author Topic: Spare the Rod, Save the Child  (Read 2094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« on: July 04, 2004, 03:45:00 AM »
43,000 - 80,000 per year per child - so instead of the parents paying the price for their child's choices, the State picks up the cost.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... -headlines


Spare the Rod, Save the Child

Missouri's youth prisons focus on small groups, therapy, caring. Officials in California's punishment-oriented system are taking a look.

By Jenifer Warren
Times Staff Writer

July 1, 2004

ST. JOSEPH, Mo. ? There are no handcuffs, no razor-wire fences, no uniforms, no cells. Missouri does things differently in its prisons for young people, and it shows ? in what you see and what you don't.

Inmates, referred to as "kids," live in dorms that feature beanbag chairs, potted plants, stuffed animals and bunk beds with smiley-face comforters. Guards ? who are called "youth specialists" and must have college degrees ? go by their first names and don't hesitate to offer hugs.

At the maximum-security lockup in St. Joseph, two cats, Midnight and Tigger, curl up on laps as the state's toughest teenage offenders explore the roots of their anger, weep over the acts of abusive parents and swap strategies for breaking free of gangs. At another facility in Kansas City, boys who rack up months of good behavior earn the right to attend summer basketball camp.

"The old corrections model was a failure; most kids left us worse off than when they came in," said Mark Steward, the chief of Missouri's youth penal system. "So we threw away that culture, and now we focus on treatment, on making connections with these guys and showing them another way?. It works."

As California struggles to reshape a juvenile prison system so troubled and violent that some legislators want it closed down, Missouri ? the Show Me State ? is winning accolades as the national leader in handling kids who break the law.

"Missouri is the best model we have out there," said Paul DeMuro, a New Jersey-based juvenile justice consultant and former chief of youth prisons in Pennsylvania.

"It works because they believe in the 'small is beautiful' theory," agreed Barry Krisberg, president of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency and the author of a recent report on California's juvenile system. "It's about high-quality treatment in an intimate setting."

Comparing recidivism numbers is tricky, but Missouri is clearly a standout among states, Krisberg said. A 2003 study found that of the 1,400 teenagers released in 1999, only 8% wound up in adult prisons. California does not keep a comparable statistic. About half of those released from its juvenile prisons, however, will be back behind bars within two years, officials say. Missouri's system also delivers when it comes to another important measurement: cost. It spends about $43,000 a year per child. California's per capita tab is nearly twice that ? $80,000 ? largely because its officers are paid almost twice as much, though the cost of living in the Golden State is near the top nationally, while Missouri's is among the lowest, statistics show.

Not one young inmate has committed suicide in the two decades since Missouri altered its approach to delinquent kids. In the California Youth Authority, meanwhile, 15 have killed themselves since 1996, including two boys found hanging by bedsheets last January in the isolation cell they shared.

Drawn by the success stories, delegations of corrections officials from around the nation are visiting Missouri for a closer look. Several states, including Louisiana, Georgia, Maryland, New Jersey and Illinois, have launched or are considering copycat programs.

Over the last 20 years, Missouri has replaced a traditional approach to young criminals ? large, prison-like lockups with an emphasis on punishment and isolation ? with small group settings that blend highly trained staff with constant therapy and positive peer pressure.

Convinced that family connections are crucial, Missouri also takes pains to house children within 50 miles of their homes. If necessary, the government sends a van to enable parents to visit.

"The Missouri system is everything the California system isn't," DeMuro said. "It's a matter of philosophy and the will to do something right and appropriate, rather than warehousing kids and creating a hotbed for gangs and more violence."

Officials in California say the pervasive presence of gangs in the state, and the fact that the CYA houses inmates as old as 25, makes the Missouri system unworkable in the Golden State. In Missouri, most inmates in juvenile prisons are younger than 18, though some are as old as 21.

"Everything I hear about Missouri tells me its programs work great for the population they have, but our demographics are very different," said Kevin Carruth, California's undersecretary of youth and adult corrections. Still, CYA Director Walt Allen plans to visit Missouri and several other states in the coming months, looking for ideas.

Krisberg, who has been advising Allen on how to address the CYA's problems, agrees that California is "different from the rest of the world, so in some ways comparisons don't make much sense." He added, however, that the essence of Missouri's system ? a commitment to small programs that emphasize treatment and rehabilitation ? could be imported.

Last month two dozen youth advocates, former CYA inmates and parents with kids currently locked up in California toured the Missouri system. They were so impressed by the contrast that they met with Allen and lawmakers in Sacramento, pressing them to adopt a similar approach.

"This place is like a dream," Katrina Allen, a Fresno minister whose 17-year-old son is in the CYA, said after visiting a medium-security facility in a woodsy park near Kansas City. "The whole focus is on treating kids so they can get a new start. In California, it's about trying not to get beat up and just doing time."

The Californians were particularly struck by the near absence of violence. Teenagers at one maximum-security center in Kansas City could recall only three scuffles in the last year, none serious. Asked if they worried about being jumped, they laughed. Staff assaults, too, are rare, said Steward, who could not remember any off the top of his head.

In California, meanwhile, a February report described the Youth Authority as a place permeated by fear among employees and inmates alike. At some prisons visited by a team of experts, youths attacked one another an average of 10 times a day. Officers at a CYA facility in Chino used Mace on youths four times a day during a four-month period in 2003, the report said.

California's present looks a lot like Missouri's past.

For almost a century, the Midwestern state housed delinquent boys in a prison-like training school with a notorious solitary-confinement cell known as "the Hole."

But in 1983, after a series of scandals and reports deploring conditions at the facility, the state decided to scatter its juveniles into groups of no more than 35 each. The move reflected research showing that in large-scale settings, youths tend to get lost and that relationships with counselors and other staff ? a key to rehabilitation ? are more difficult to forge.

After a fitful start, Missouri gradually settled on a formula, one heavy on therapy and anchored by a complex peer culture that helps teenagers resolve day-to-day problems, confront the roots of their criminality and seek a promising life path.

The rehabilitative philosophy is reflected even in the aesthetics of the lockups. Dorm rooms overflow with homey touches ? a piano and scented candle here, a fish tank and flowered shower curtain there. The correctional officers look different too. Dressed in their own clothes, Missouri's staff members carry no Mace, no batons, no handcuffs ? only walkie-talkies.

"We don't need that stuff," said Courtney Collier, the system's regional director in Kansas City. If you do, she said, "you've got a problem."

To create such a safe environment, officials rely largely on a peer culture that engulfs youths the moment they enter a state facility. Assigned to 10-member teams with two counselors, the teenagers study, eat, sleep and exercise together. Several times a day, team members gather to "check in" with one another, a ritual that allows them to share concerns or complaints before they boil over into violence.

More talk takes place after school in group treatment rooms. There, sitting together on floor pillows, youths revisit traumatic events in their lives and look for patterns that help explain what led them astray.

One exercise designed to unearth pain from the past is the creation of a "genogram," an elaborate family tree depicting violence, drug addiction and other ills suffered by relatives. Another requires teenagers to outline their bodies on a sheet of white paper and chart the emotional and physical wounds they've suffered.

At the Northwest Regional Youth Center in Kansas City, for example, one boy's illustration featured marks on the head to reflect brain damage associated with methamphetamine use. Elsewhere, other scribbles symbolized scars and bruises, reflecting street fights and physical and sexual abuse by a parent.

Youths say the group therapy can be wrenching for newcomers.

"Most of us come in with a fight mentality," said Eric White, 16, of Kansas City, a lanky youth who is doing time for burglary and was recently named student of the month at the Northwest Center. "But pretty soon you see there's no reason for that here."

Occasionally, youths do fight ? especially the newly arrived. When that happens, Missouri permits the juveniles, assisted by a staff member, to use a controversial tactic known as a "restraint" ? wrestling the aggressor to the ground and holding fast until the youth calms down.

Some juvenile justice experts say offenders should not be permitted to lay hands on each other. Steward said it works here because of the intimate "team culture." There have been no injuries or lawsuits over the restraints, he said, adding that they rarely occur.

Jerry Riley, 17, has never been restrained. But he arrived in the Missouri system with a defiant attitude and a long string of crimes under his belt. Initially, the youth said, he figured he could "fake the program, do my own thing." But as the months passed, his anger subsided and he spotted an opportunity.

"Basically, this place allowed me the chance to be a child," said Riley, a garrulous teenager with broad shoulders and a wide grin. "My mom had five kids, she was living check to check, so I was always an adult, taking care of myself. I was always fighting, selling drugs, shooting at people, getting shot at ? and I thought that was regular."

A year ago, he was arrested for selling crack cocaine and sent to the Northwest Center. "I'm glad I got caught," he said, "because I was on my way to doing bigger and bigger things."

After months of exemplary behavior, Riley has earned top privileges, including daily phone calls, regular outings into the community and a week of basketball camp. He is so trusted by staff that he recently led the California visitors on a tour of the Northwest facility, dressed in a blue polo shirt and slacks. Like any good tour guide, he checked the clock frequently to make sure he stayed on schedule.

Riley, who is weeks away from discharge and plans to attend college in the fall, will have a lot of help when he goes home, because intensive after-care is another uncommon hallmark of Missouri's approach.

From their first day in the state system to their last, youths are teamed with a single counselor, who develops a treatment plan tailored to their needs. Once out, a youth is assigned a second adult known as a "tracker," who acts somewhat like a big brother and meets with the parolee every few days to ensure he is staying straight.

Steward calls kids like Riley his goodwill ambassadors, and uses them to sell the story of Missouri's program in the Legislature and beyond. So far, political support has been steady and bipartisan. One big fan was the late Gov. Mel Carnahan, a Democrat, who was so taken with the program that he used to play host to a handful of boys in his statehouse office a few times a year. Another backer is conservative state Supreme Court Judge Stephen Limbaugh, cousin of radio commentator Rush Limbaugh.

Supporters say that beyond the recidivism numbers, they are captivated by the stories of lives turned around. One who embodies that transformation is Brian Laoruangroch, an ex-offender who was recently elected student body president at the University of Missouri.

Earlier this year, he called his former counselor and volunteered to help promote the program. Steward wasted no time: "I said, 'See what he's doing next Tuesday,' and I brought him with us down to the House for our budget hearing."

Dressed sharply in suit and tie, the student leader recounted his lifelong struggle with drugs and other troubles, and explained the metamorphosis that took place inside Missouri's juvenile system. The legislators were smitten. Despite a budget deficit and cuts to agencies across state government, they left the youth corrections budget largely intact.

Steward said he believes that his state's success can be replicated in California, despite the different mix of offenders. Older inmates, he said, have a maturity level that helps them "get" the program faster than younger kids. And Missouri's experience with youths from tough St. Louis gangs shows that such street ties are eroded by the strong peer bonds kids develop inside.

Krisberg, the president of the national council on delinquency, said the mission statement of the CYA would lead you to believe that it was "supposed to be doing the same thing they do in Missouri. But somewhere along the way, California went off track."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2004, 08:43:00 PM »
***43,000 - 80,000 per year per child - so instead of the parents paying the price for their child's choices, the State picks up the cost.

Let us all pat you on the back for 'paying the price' for your child's 'choices'. Good lord knows, you, as the parent had nothing to do with shaping the choices your child would make.

We will always have juvenile prisons, paid for with tax dollars. If someone can do it in a more humane and respectful way, that has to be a good thing. I would imagine that many of the parents (single with 5 kids, etc) couldn't afford the cost of a private program- which seems to be what you are implying?
Are you out of touch with reality?

And, private placements aren't necessarily paid for by parents. There are plenty whose 'tuitions' are paid with insurance and IEP money. I'm guessing that your particular choice in program does not 'qualify' for either?

What I got from the article is that these are kids who have been in serious trouble with the law, truly 'at-risk', at risk of loosing their rights and freedoms if not their lives; who have been conditioned by their daily reality to think that such things as drive-bys are 'normal', everyday activities. Put one of these kids in a WWASP program and some staff members will be at-risk of being killed or seriously maimed the first time they order one of these kids to lie face down on the floor for hours.

I'm reserving judgment until details of how their program is adminstered are available. But, from the little I read, sounds like a healthier, more humane environment than other prisons and any private program I'm familiar with.

How many have animals? Or smiley face comforters? Or anything that resembles a home environment. A PIANO!!, fish tank, flowered shower curtain. Useful therapy instead of confrontational, in-your-face, mind-twisting, bullshit and punishment if you smile or look in the mirror or out the window. And in the case of your program of choice, degreed staff. How many would send vans to pick up parents for visits?

I have no doubt I could find fault with the program, but it's definitely a damn site better than what we've had in the past. A step in the right direction. A step I'd be okay to support with my tax dollars. I'd much rather pay for this than for them to be tortured and punished, even if it's the lessor of two evils.

If my child was being court ordered to a private program or this prison, I'd pick the prison based on what I read in this article.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline spots

  • Posts: 251
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2004, 10:14:00 PM »
I live in Northern California, and a local "juvie", Crystal Creek, is in serious danger of losing financial funding.  This program houses about 60+ young teens, and has been touted as having the same beneficial program as that in the Missouri article.  

They spend about $60K/year each for the boys, and have a very low recividism rate.  It is "jail", after all, but for some it is the best life they have ever seen.  We live in a tourist-destination spot, full of mountains, streams, trees, lakes, fishing.  The boys partake of these things, plus learning some hard life lessons with an intensive staff-to-student ratio.  [OK, there are "Don't Pick Up Hitchhiker" signs on the highway nearby, which is kind of funny.] I have to admit that the CYA (California Youth Authority) has taken some serious hits lately, well-deserved.  Crystal Creek seems quite different, and I hope they will receive the funding they need.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2004, 11:33:00 PM »
Deborah and Spots -

You are talking out of both sides of your mouths.  These juvenile programs are beginning to model the private pay programs, same confrontational groups, therapy, personal development and growth.  The only thing missing, a big part, is the family/parent components.  They may have this, it just wasn't mentioned in the article.  The only differences in kids in the private programs and those in the juvenile system is that the former didn't get caught and those that are violent.  Plus having a record until they are 18?

I don't get it.  If the State pays, it's okay, but if the parents pay, it's wrong?  I am feeling very good right now that Missouri is modeling a different approach that in a lot of ways mirrors the private pay programs.  

I don't believe that the kids in the juvenile system are bad kids, they are in many ways the same as those in a Program.  It's finally possible for those that have other kids at home, and don't make the money that it would take to keep their kid out of juvenile jail or death to get the same kind of help "in the system."  It's a start in the right direction.    

I also would like to see the California juvenile place you're talking about, Spots, to get the funding.  Maybe they are different and controversial - and that's why...  It works!  Can't have that, can we? Something that works!!

Deborah, my particular choice of program does accept insurance if the insurance is good enough to cover therapeutic residential placement.  Most don't for more than 30 days.  IEP is also possible, but damn hard to get, especially if it's not in the State we live. Staff are Master's degreed and PHD level.  You assume a lot about one comment.  I've heard the parents need to be parents, but if they pay for help as opposed to the State paying, they are in someway wrong. We just have two different ways of thinking...but they both are okay.   :wink:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2004, 05:08:00 AM »
Given that teens who violate laws of a serious nature WILL end up incarcerated in prison at the tax payers expense, I'd much prefer they be treated in a more humane way. It might make sense to require parents who CAN afford it, to pay for their kids incarceration in prison. I'd certainly vote for that. To think that the parents of the majority of kids who land in prison can afford private programs is absurd, and demonstrates your ignorance on the issue.

Teens in prison are definitely different than middle-class teens who land in private programs. Go for a visit. There are kids there who would shoot you and not think much about it. Most program sites assure parents that they do not accept juvenile offenders or seriously distressed kids. No middle-class parent is going to voluntarily incarcerate their sassy, back-talking teen with criminals or psychotics. Although, we all know that some ARE taken, and that some programs attempt to keep the 'criminals' seperate from the 'spoiled brats'- 'Emotional terrorists' as one program supporter refered to them.

I know of no program that offers the type of 'therapy' described in the article, nor that attempts to create a homey, more nurturing environment. Most elaborate on the importance of disorienting the kid, taking away everything familiar and important to them in order to gain compliance.

Teens who are ordered to prison are given due process, teens in the private industry are not. Prisoners know why they are being incarcerated and the length of their sentence.

You posted the article and don't appear to have read it or comprehended it. Yes, there is contact with parents. "Convinced that family connections are crucial, Missouri also takes pains to house children within 50 miles of their homes. If necessary, the government sends a van to enable parents to visit."
Do parents participate in seminars? Who knows? Didn't say.

My guess is that you were too focused on trying to make the point that the prison system was 'mirroring' the private pay industry to catch the obvious differences. Although they surely have some similarities, the Missouri prison program is not a mirror of private programs; if anything, the industry might learn something from them.

Yes, I assumed based on your comment. So are you going to divulge which program you promote so your comments can be scrutinized?

Shame on you. Your agenda is clear; and your attempt to use the success of the Missouri prison program to validate the teen warehouse industry has failed. What people need to see is a report from an independent study of the private pay industry. You know, complete with demographics, showing what behaviors the kids were incarcerated for (without due process) and if the kids returned to those behaviors after the program- 1,3,5 years after release.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2004, 10:15:00 AM »
Quote
On 2004-07-05 02:08:00, Deborah wrote:

"

Given that teens who violate laws of a serious nature WILL end up incarcerated in prison at the tax payers expense, I'd much prefer they be treated in a more humane way. It might make sense to require parents who CAN afford it, to pay for their kids incarceration in prison. I'd certainly vote for that. To think that the parents of the majority of kids who land in prison can afford private programs is absurd, and demonstrates your ignorance on the issue.



Teens in prison are definitely different than middle-class teens who land in private programs. Go for a visit. There are kids there who would shoot you and not think much about it. Most program sites assure parents that they do not accept juvenile offenders or seriously distressed kids. No middle-class parent is going to voluntarily incarcerate their sassy, back-talking teen with criminals or psychotics. Although, we all know that some ARE taken, and that some programs attempt to keep the 'criminals' seperate from the 'spoiled brats'- 'Emotional terrorists' as one program supporter refered to them.



I know of no program that offers the type of 'therapy' described in the article, nor that attempts to create a homey, more nurturing environment. Most elaborate on the importance of disorienting the kid, taking away everything familiar and important to them in order to gain compliance.



Teens who are ordered to prison are given due process, teens in the private industry are not. Prisoners know why they are being incarcerated and the length of their sentence.



You posted the article and don't appear to have read it or comprehended it. Yes, there is contact with parents. "Convinced that family connections are crucial, Missouri also takes pains to house children within 50 miles of their homes. If necessary, the government sends a van to enable parents to visit."

Do parents participate in seminars? Who knows? Didn't say.



My guess is that you were too focused on trying to make the point that the prison system was 'mirroring' the private pay industry to catch the obvious differences. Although they surely have some similarities, the Missouri prison program is not a mirror of private programs; if anything, the industry might learn something from them.



Yes, I assumed based on your comment. So are you going to divulge which program you promote so your comments can be scrutinized?



Shame on you. Your agenda is clear; and your attempt to use the success of the Missouri prison program to validate the teen warehouse industry has failed. What people need to see is a report from an independent study of the private pay industry. You know, complete with demographics, showing what behaviors the kids were incarcerated for (without due process) and if the kids returned to those behaviors after the program- 1,3,5 years after release.



"


I couldn't agree more.

*Excellent* post.

Timoclea
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Spare the Rod, Save the Child
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2004, 12:26:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-07-04 20:33:00, Anonymous wrote:

 The only differences in kids in the private programs and those in the juvenile system is that the former didn't get caught and those that are violent. Plus having a record until they are 18?


There's another very important difference. Kids in juvenile detention have gone to trial, represented by a lawyer and been convicted of an actual crime. Kids who get sucked into the troubled parent type gulags might only be "guilty" of breaking a 7PM curfew or listening to "devil music".

Anther big difference, the article says they rarely use restraints and haven't had a suicide in how long? And how many kids in custody? While WWASP had a very well known suicide just a short while ago. See http://fornits.com/anonanon/docs/wwasp/toc.htm for details.

The most important bill in our whole code is that for the diffusion of
knowledge among the people. No other sure foundation can be devised, for the preservation of freedom and happiness.

--Thomas Jefferson

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes