Author Topic: Why WWASPS  (Read 2719 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spots

  • Posts: 251
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« on: May 17, 2004, 01:42:00 PM »
Someone challenges my "harping" on WWASPS because there are so many other bad programs out there that need attention.  I do so because this is what I know.  Like an author, one must write about personal knowledge to be most effective.  

I am gratified that so many others with other experiences are participating in this Teen Help forum.  The whole business is a very bad thing, and so many instances are "group homes" [particularly in Utah] that house 6, maybe 10 people, and practice the same hurtful/not-helpful "solutions" to parents' problem children.  They can't all be shut down by going after them piece-meal.  WWASPS is the largest, most visible entity right now, and has the slick responses to every parent's questions down pat.  It is harder for a discerning parent to sift through the rhetoric and find the truth, when the truth is hidden by masters of deception. Kill the giant, and the ants that feed on it will also die.

Deborah has experience that she re-tells well, and it involves a credentialed, degree-laden "school" that was as bad as any WWASPS facility.  All the Straight survivors tell stories (anecdotes, really) about their similar experiences and give an older adult perspective on "what happens next".  Cherish Wisdom has recent experience and a fire in her belly against an old school still practicing the same abuse.  The mentality is the same in these places, and it is the *methods* that need to be illegal in order to squash those little fly-by-night places scattered in your own residential neighborhood.  First and foremost, there must be open communication with the students and the outside world.  Sunshine kills a fungus.

I submit anecdotes that I know are true about the daily life in a WWASPS facility.  My goal is to spread the word, to counter the propoganda, to make people remember some small fact that they might use when hearing about these behavior modification plants. Each contributor of stories has a role, and it does no good to harangue one another about "missing the mark because you're ignoring all those ed cons", etc.  EACH STORY HAS A PURPOSE.  

I don't have an "angle" particularly, except that I know that the whole industry is enjoying a "re-birth" which is quite young.  You'd hope that Straight had died a painful death, but these programs seem to be popping up to serve some need of the current wave of parents.  The programs should not be an available option.

We are struggling now with life with a 15yo in the house, with all the baggage of being a WWASPS survivor AND a 15yo AND the personality of this particular child.  That doesn't leave a lot of emotional energy to battle WWASPS windmills, so a lot of my energy goes into this public venue of telling it like it is.  I hope it touches a lot of lives and saves some.  

My grandaughter told me this weekend a story...one of my "anectdotes".  I asked if Ensenada had beaches.  No, it is mostly cliffs into the sea and lots of rocks.  Then she told me about one of the "classrooms" at Casa by the Sea.  It had a huge slider window on the ocean-facing wall, but the kids were not allowed to look out. To do so would earn consequences, most often a whole day in a tiny cubicle listening to very old self-help tapes geared toweard salesmen, played at high volume, and being forced to come up with thousands of words of "analysis" of this inane tape heard many times before.  She said that finally, about 6 months into her stay there, the staff gave up trying to legislate people's wandering eyes, and then allowed a glance out the window of NO MORE THAN 10 SECONDS DURATION...short enough to not formulate "run plans".  The kids saw a man prying abalones off the rocks and capturing baby octopi on a regular basis, and from that glimpse, she learned some of the cultural awareness that WWASPS widely promised in their marketing brochures. I asked if she had told her mom about any of this particular stuff, such petty and stupid rules, and she answered, "No, she doesn't believe me anyway".  Who would make up a story like this?  For what purpose?

FWIW, one of my "little stories".
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline cherish wisdom

  • Posts: 586
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2004, 02:51:00 PM »
This newclip shows that Lichfield learned everything at Provo Canyon School. It's interesting that the school was temporarily shut down for cruelty to children shortly after Lichfield left. He called his experience at Provo Canyon School a "baptism by fire." It is sickening that Lichfield claims that the adversary is trying to use dark forces to thwart his righteous efforts. As a member of the same religious denomination - I believe the opposite is true. What he is doing is pure evil - their is nothing righteous about the tactics used at Provo Canyon School or any of the WWASPS programs. A simple, free, 12-step program from AA or NA is more effective.  AA also encourages people to allow a higher power to help them overcome their addictions. Love is not associated with these programs. Greed, sadism, dominion over human beings is more appropriate.

Doubting Their 'Tough Love'
July 13, 2003

By John-Thor Dahlburg, Times Staff Writer


ST. GEORGE, Utah -- Robert Browning Lichfield opened his first "tough-love" academy at a time when he was so financially strapped that he, his wife and four children lived crowded together in a one-room apartment.

In the ensuing 16 years, Lichfield had three more children, added 10 schools to his investment portfolio and founded a business empire whose holdings include everything from restaurants to radio stations.

At 49, Lichfield cuts an unmistakable swath through this fast-growing southwestern Utah city. In achieving material success, he has also become something of a civic and political figure ? and a major contributor to the state's Republican Party.

When asked about his success, and about the criticism surrounding the school network that he created, he makes reference to his fervent Mormon faith.

God is the key to his accomplishments, he says, and Satan is stirring up his foes.

"We're here getting kids off drugs and other evils," Lichfield said during a rare interview at the headquarters of the World Wide Assn. of Specialty Programs and Schools. "We're here connecting kids with their families. We're here getting kids in touch with their higher source.

"Do I believe, being a God-believing person, that the adversary to all good is going to sit back and let that happen without a major unleashing of dark forces? No, I don't."

Lichfield is a bearded man, with a burly physique and shy, congenial manner recalling John Candy, the late actor and comic. He wore an open-necked shirt and toyed with a business card during an interview with the Los Angeles Times ? a meeting he agreed to only after months of negotiation.

He requested his photograph not be published in The Times because "some kids are a little deranged.... You never know what they might do."

Lichfield says his role in the for-profit schools is that of an investor and advisor, but his adversaries say he has a key role in managing them. Whatever the case, he usually leaves Ken Kay, the association's white-haired president, to answer questions about the schools' policies.

Lichfield's role in politics is easier to pin down. According to Federal Elections Commission records, Lichfield and his wife gave the Republican Party $175,000 in a recent 12-month period, and he was named Republican of the Year this year by the Washington County GOP.

"As a person, he is great," said county GOP Chairman Naghi Zeenati. "He is community-minded and always available to help."

Lichfield got his first job with problem teens in 1977 when he was a "dorm parent" at a private boys' school on a wooded lot north of Provo. At the fenced-in compound known as Provo Canyon School for Boys, students were subjected to tough treatment, including long periods of solitary confinement and forced lie-detector tests.

It was "baptism by fire," said Lichfield, who has no formal qualifications in education or child psychology and didn't graduate from college. On the job, he said, "you learn real fast, just as a [physician's assistant] learns doctoring skills by working with doctors."

However, not all of his charges from those days recall the fledgling educator with fondness. David Doran, 34, of Tarzana spent time in his youth at Provo Canyon and said he remembers Lichfield as a humorless, dictatorial figure who seemed to delight in taunting students.

About the same time, Lichfield founded the Cross Creek school, his first. In 1987, Lichfield signed a contract to run Brightway Adolescent Hospital in St. George, which health officials said quickly became a pipeline for enrolling students in tough-love schools.

State inspectors investigated the private psychiatric institution after receiving complaints of children being admitted without consent from both parents and a failure to report a suspected case of child abuse, Utah Department of Health spokeswoman Debra Wynkoop said. The hospital shut down in 1998 after being informed by state health officials that they were going to order its closure, Wynkoop said.

By the time WWASPS was created in 1998, Lichfield said he had let other people assume ownership and management of the schools. Ken Kay, president of WWASPS, declined a request from The Times to provide a list of the owners. But some affiliates are family members.

What Lichfield does own, he said, are many of the buildings and grounds that house the WWASPS schools. Title formally belongs to a legal entity with a name intentionally so long newspapers won't print it, he joked. That entity, the Robert Browning Lichfield Limited Family Partnership, has Lichfield and his wife, Patricia, as sole partners, according to documents filed with the Utah secretary of state's office in 1995. Lichfield said he co-owns other properties with business associates.

As for his role in WWASPS, on paper Lichfield is simply a trustee. Some adversaries contend that the limited designation is the way he protects himself from legal liability.

A thicket of interrelated, for-profit companies has grown up around the nonprofit WWASPS. They include Teen Help, the association's marketing arm; Teen Escort Service, which convoys children to and from member schools; and R&B Billing, which sends the monthly bills to parents and processes their payments.

Thomas Burton, an attorney in Pleasanton, Calif., who has sued WWASPS, its member schools and associated businesses at least seven times ? though he has yet to win a case ? contends that all of these entities function as a huge, single commercial venture with Lichfield at the heart.

"The corporations keep shifting and being reconstituted with different people in different places," Burton said. "It seems they want to keep this a moving target."

In March, the Northern California lawyer filed suit in federal court in Salt Lake City on behalf of a former student at Tranquility Bay, claiming the WWASPS school in Jamaica was a "steaming squalid jungle camp, infested with flies, mosquitoes, scorpions and vermin."

After listening patiently during his interview with The Times to a recounting of these kinds of parent and student complaints, Lichfield spoke again of religious faith and his conviction that the methods he pioneered have aided many.

"God can't help everybody. I don't know how we're going to," he said. "But it [WWASPS] does provide an opportunity for thousands of kids to improve their lives. Those who choose not to, choose not to."

I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure.

--Clarence Darrow

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
If you lack wisdom ask of God and it shall be given to you.\"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2004, 04:00:00 PM »
Spots.  Didn't a grad post at one time about looking out a window and stupid petty rules? Ican't find it, but those rules are about self control, not run plans.   Isn't self control one of the biggest reasons parents choose a program like this? Did your grand daughter reach points enough to go off grounds, to the beach, etc.?  If it was that important to her to do these activities, she did, so why didn't she go to the beach? Self control is something we can all use in many situations including anger, drugs, eating and talking.  I don't think it's that different in your grand daughters experience than it is at other similar schools.  Where is this abuse?  Maybe it wasn't her mother not believing her, maybe she saw the purpose in the rules.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline cherish wisdom

  • Posts: 586
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2004, 05:30:00 PM »
The rules and punishments infringe on basic human rights and Constitutional rights. Courts have ruled that institutions have no right to infringe on Costitutional freedoms. These children are punished for asking to go to the bathroom, smiling, looking out of a window.  The rules make no sence whatsoever and serve no purpose other than to torment, humiliate and dominate. Many parents are not aware of other less drastic measures for their problem children. Most children who have these behavior and drug problems come from disfunctional and abusive homes. It has been demonstrated that 60% of children who use drugs have parents who abuse substances. In fact, 40% of the children who use drugs have used with their own parents.  
Before sending a child to one of these dens of horror parents need to take a good look at what they are doing to contribute to the problem. Is their marriage in shambles?  Are they abusing substances including prescription drugs? Is the homelife abusive? Are they watching their children and screening their friends? Are they taking their drug or alcohol addicted child to AA and NA meetings everyday?
Many parents don't want to take a good look at themselves and realize that their problems have contributed to the situation.  It is much eacier to ship the child off to Jamaica or Mexico than to make necessary changes.  Most of the children come from broken  homes, abusive of disfunctional homes.  Many parents don't want to take the time to do what is necessary to bring their child back to sobriety. It's not convienent.  
I try not to blame parents - but one must do a complete self inventory before putting all of the blame on the child.  
These  programs are not the answer. Most use abusive measures to change behavior. The program used is not based on any type of sound medical or psychological data. Many of the children suffer from depression.  The abusive, punitive measures used serve only to re-traumatize.  

The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled.
-- Plutarch

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
If you lack wisdom ask of God and it shall be given to you.\"

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2004, 02:08:00 AM »
How many parents, or adults AT ALL, live like they want these kids to be? How many parents curse, whine, yell, do selfish things like everyone does?

LIBERATE YOUR MIND. If a kid acts just like you watn them to in those stupid programs, as an adult, they're going to end up used, manipulated, and generally unable to do anything on their own. They'er going to be doormats.

You need to be selfish, do what you WANT TO DO, TO GRATIFY YOURSELF, and take care of yourself. Submitting to authority would be a good survival skill in a fascist regime. Last I checked we're supposed to question authority, not bend over and lube up for it. Authority gets the respect it earns, period. Power on its own is just power.

Nevermind the emotional scarring from being abused so much, and probably having a LOT of trouble having a relationship with someone beyond a surface friendship - if they actually DO act that way they'd be damned LEMMINGS. This is a nation of individuals, cultivate that.[ This Message was edited by: Nihilanthic on 2004-05-17 23:08 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2004, 12:19:00 PM »
Cherish says:
 Most of the children come from broken homes, abusive of disfunctional homes. Many parents don't want to take the time to do what is necessary to bring their child back to sobriety. It's not convienent.

I do respect your point of view here; but I don't think this is accurate. I'm basing my point of view from the time I spent on the BBS (wwasp's parent Bulletin board)And while no doubt there was alot of data drop out when describing family dynamics; It seemed to be a place where people did air a lot of laundry; and while there were divorced parents; and step parents and all that; I don't think the percentage was any higher than society at large. There wasn't a noticeable disproportionate numbers of split or dysfunctional families. I would argue, for the most part, the parents are/where average folk, doing the best they could and truly feeling the extreme measure of the program necessary; as all other options had failed. Generally, these families have done everything that can be done, without any improvement, prior to turning to out of home placement.

The cold, detachment that so many have, is in my opinion, the result of "working their own Program".

This ISN'T saying there are plenty who have done just as has been suggested; and just wanted an out from raising a teen. I just don't think its near Most.

And I'm sure you've noticed, The Program uses your exact same argument to explain its detractors. They are divorced spouses;  Disgruntled & Dysfunctional family members; and that is why they oppose the program.

I understand the tendency to want to revile the parents who have so placed their teen; But if your intent is to find solutions to the problem; it won't help to put all the blame on "stupid Parents".

In my view, society itself is becoming increasingly dysfunctional. The unfortunate fact is; the majority of teens placed in such programs are having serious and severe problems of various sorts. Sadly, very often, more the result of unrecognized developing mental illness; and such a "treatment modality" couldn't be more inappropriate.  
For some reason that sociologist and Psychologist have yet to discover (or admit) there is an epidemic of mental illness in young adults and teens and increasingly in children (which was once unheard of) And this is Partly why you have these programs.
Mental health care in this country is not adequate and the outlook for many patients is dismal in many ways.
Improved mental health care; screening and  treatment and realistic expectations, would go a long way to cutting the throat of manipulating and opportunistic private programs.
Mental health parity laws are something everyone here should be lobbying for.

Then there is drug abuse (also often a sign of mental health problems; i.e.:self medicating)It is a much more serious problem effecting far greater numbers than in generations past; And I am not talking about the casual pot smoker or a few beers on weekends. I am referring to the teen who will do what ever it takes to get and stay doped up at all times with no regard for the consequences or cost.

Their parents are terrified for them; and Ginger, I understand your point of view on this issue; But it is a fact the parents Are terrified, even if it is statistically unlikely their nightmare will come to pass.

Far to often, the options available to families in this situation are as unrealistic and useless as the services available to the young mental patient. As a result, families that can afford it turn to these opportunistic and manipulating Programs for help.

This could be largely rectified with the before mentioned parity laws as well - but we need to get real and face some facts as a society - Why is there this epidemic of deeply troubled people?

And naturally, I agree we need Federal laws to regulate and guard the safety of the kids in any residentional program; Private or state operated - Because clearly, the states are Not up to the job!
Penalties for abuse or gross neglect need to be severe. We need to make employment in a residentional teen facility attractive to good people interested in Helping troubled lives; and less (far lass) attractive to pedophiles and sadist.

Nihilanthic, you comment on what kind of people these programs chrun out - the stepford types we have grown familiar with. I agree. However, I do take issue with you comments on authority. It is important to understand we are all under authority of some type from someone; and authority always wins. This isn't to say there aren't occasions when authority needs to be circumvented or ignored or overthrown; Just that to make it a habit in life, will make for a lot of aggravation and stress and trouble and who needs that?

And as for doing what you want and all; keep in mind this tid bit of wisdom for Tina Turner:
Now you might get what you want; But later you won't want what you got.

Anon with the statement about the reason for the rules - you can't REALLY think that the extremely petty, numerous and impossible rules teach anything beneficial, can you? The severity of the consequences for breaking any of these extremely petty and numerous rules is proof of their real intent; which is to beat their psyches into submission. Not a good thing in most people's view. Not a good thing at all.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline cherish wisdom

  • Posts: 586
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #6 on: May 18, 2004, 06:58:00 PM »
ANNON wrote:

"For some reason that sociologist and Psychologist have yet to discover (or admit) there is an epidemic of mental illness in young adults and teens and increasingly in children (which was once unheard of) And this is Partly why you have these programs.
Mental health care in this country is not adequate and the outlook for many patients is dismal in many ways."

This is true - but these programs are not the answer.  What happens is all children are treated "run of the mill." It doesn't matter what their diagnosis is - all are treated the same. This shows that they are not using appropriate care plans for each patient. I had a rotation at Utah State Hospital many years ago. Because there were daily visiting hours, phone privalages and so forth - I saw no abuse. When a facility is open to public scrutiny it seems the patients are treated with more dignity and respect.  In a traditional setting patients are treated for their specific mental illnesses medically and therapeutically.  For instance a goal for a depressed patient would be to gain more self esteem. To formulate a plan to treat this illness, data must be taken and an assessment and plan formulated. This is refered to as SOAP ( gather subjective and objective data - assess it and then formulate an individual care plan}. This is not done in these facilities. All are treated the same and there is a lot of NEGATIVE and PUNITIVE measures used to change behavior.  The so called treatment which is more like punishment is not based on any sound data.
What is surprising is the fact that children are sent to these dens of horror and abuse for mental illness. A facility like Provo Canyon School should never take a child who is depressed or a victim of trauma. My child happened to be in that category and the "program" did her much more harm than good.  Mentally ill children should not be placed in these residential programs for another reason. Residential programs are not required to obey State and Federal Mental Health codes that are in place to protect the mentally ill from abuse. I personally obtained this information from Ken Stettler, the Director of Health and Human Services in Utah.  The only rules they must abide by are "core rules." I read them and they are basic rules - and also set limits for the abusive measures and islation used for behavior modification.
Big Problem - most parents aren't aware that their children are not being protected by State and Federal Mental Health Codes. There is one Federal code that all must abide by - US CODE TITLE 42.  In this code the definition of "facilty" would include residential facilities. What has been anoying to me is the fact that the facility that my daughter went to is listed on the Utah dot gove site as a HOSPITAL. So far none of the authorities in Utah have answered my questions regarding this. Check it out - type in Utah Valley Hospital Provo Canyon School (on search)  What you will find is a Utah dot gov site showing that Provo Canyon School is a hospital in the Provo area.  It's almost like the government of Utah is trying to cover for the school - and this thouroughly pisses me off.  I truly beleive that the children who have been abused in these facilities should join together and sue the devil out of the State of Utah. Literally!

Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic
for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has
happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to
the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail,
there will be anarchy throughout the world.

http://www.marshfield.net/History/webster.htm' target='_new'>Daniel Webster

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
If you lack wisdom ask of God and it shall be given to you.\"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2004, 12:11:00 AM »
Cherish, I agree. I didn't intend to seem as if I was saying these kinds of programs are ever apropreate for a mental patient; or a drug addled kid.

I was trying to say that the lack of viable options for these families sends them looking for alternitives; and they find these programs that then sell the family whatever they are looking for.

Anything else I might say, you have covered - so I'll leave it at that for now.

I had not considered filing suit against Utah; but thats an interesting idea. . .
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Why WWASPS
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2004, 11:03:00 AM »
One of the reasons there's an epidemic of mental illness is, paradoxically, psychiatric medication.

The major mental illnesses are *highly* genetically influenced.

The presence of good, effective psychiatric medication makes it possible for more of us with major mental illnesses (including me) to survive, build stable marriages, and reproduce.

Which results in kids with a higher statistical likelihood of being mentally ill.

How long have we had lithium salts and thorazine, with more and more effective drugs following them?

I'm not saying mentally ill people (like me) shouldn't take our medications or shouldn't have children.

I'm just saying that more mentally ill children is one rational, predictable consequence of effective treatments for serious mental illness.

Also, we used to not recognize mental illness in children even when it existed.  I was clearly mentally ill by age six---but the prevailing medical theory was that children didn't get major mental illnesses, so, consistent with that theory, I wasn't diagnosed until age seventeen.

With better drugs and better and better data over the long term about mental illness, including the understanding that the big ones are genetic, the doctors are learning to recognize the people with that genetic package in childhood instead of, as before, just beginning to identify them in their late teens and early twenties.

So some of the increase in mentally ill children is real, some of it is an illusion---an artifact of our better understanding of mental illness.

The reason I'm not worried about more mentally ill children from more mentally ill people having kids is that while, right now, we only have treatments and not cures, with our ever-expanding understanding of the causes of these illnesses, and of the human genome, and our developing technologies of gene therapy----eventually there's going to be a cure.  Easily within a generation.  And the cure's going to be selective---leaving affected children enough of the gene complex to be smart and creative, but not enough to get sick.

So we do have a pretty good understanding of *some* of the causes of the apparent increase in mental illness in children.

And, of course, although it wasn't the point of *this* post, mentally ill people--whether children or adults----should *never* be deliberately subjected to extreme psychological stresses.

All of these behavior modification programs routinely use extreme psychological stress to force the patients/inmates to change their perceived problem behaviors.

That's an entirely inappropriate way to handle mentally ill people, and can result in the mentally ill person harming or killing himself or others.  When this happens, behavioral modification programs who knowingly accept or retain mentally ill patients/inmates should be held accountable for criminal negligence, reckless endangerment, and/or depraved indifference, at the very least.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »