Author Topic: Craig Rogers  (Read 2505 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« on: March 30, 2004, 10:31:00 PM »
Mister Rogers, in your postings to this forum you have come across to me as an obnoxious jerk.  

If "Word of Wisdom" is in fact an alias of yours, which should be verifiable from ip addresses and such, I find it a matter of more than a little concern that you appear to believe in actual literal demons and appear to believe some poster who was criticizing you is possessed by same---that's based on your own words.

I wouldn't trust someone who believes in demon possession and that they can diagnose same over the internet with a pet dog, much less a child.

And you know what?  *NONE* of what I just said is actionable.

And *any* of it should be enough to give *any* parent pause about whether it would be a wise decision on their part to entrust their precious child into your care.

So I hope that if Ginger takes other postings about you and your school down that she leaves this one up.

Oh, and Ginger, this is Julie, I think you have my email address (I emailed you before).  If Craig threatens you with lawyers over this expression of my personal opinion of him based on his own behavior in your forum, I would be *more* than happy to work with your defense.

Defamation laws, and interference with business laws, were *never* intended to be used as a club to silence opinion (like mine) nor to silence truthful criticisms of businesses by people who have had unsatisfactory dealings with those businesses.

Mr. Rogers' blanket demand that *all* criticism of his business and his person be censored is absolutely unsupportable under the law.  As his own lawyer will no doubt inform him.

I am not a lawyer, I just have strong views about free speech.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Craig Rogers
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2004, 11:31:00 PM »
Hi Julie,

  Don't worry, I don't forsee having to censor these fora anytime soon. But, just to be sure, if there's anything you want to make sure doesn't get away, just quote it so that the author can't edit it later.

  I'm not sure where to look for your email. Could you send a note through http://fornits.com/comnt.php so I'll have it?

Thanks,
Ginger


Moralizing, with the force of law or coercion, is a
far greater crime against the constitutional principles of our nation than unauthorized euphoria, regardless of the substance involved, be it chocolate or heroin.
--James



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
American drug war P.O.W.
Seed sibling `71 - `80
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
   10/80 - 10/82
Anonymity Anonymous
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Troubled Turd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2004, 12:05:00 AM »
Craig Rogers, I - AM - VERY - DISAPPOINTED - IN YOU.... YOU EVIL MAN! Shame on you! SHAME!!!  :eek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Mr. Rogers

  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://pbskids.org/rogers/
Craig Rogers
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2004, 01:26:00 AM »
Hi neighbor! How are you? I'm very, very good today! I just wanted to stop and say hi and let you know I was thinking of you.

Also, I wanted to talk to you a little bit about names. Did you ever go to school or maybe to a friend's house with your mom and you found someone who had your name too? But it wasn't you at all, of course. It was another person who just had your same name.

Well, I want all you boys and girls to understand that, even though I'm Mr. Rogers and Craig is Mr. Rogers, that doesn't mean we're the same person.  My name is Fred Rogers. So, if I were still on Earth, I'd have to change the name of my TV show to  "Mr. Fred Rogers Neighborhood". But, in case you watch reruns, I wouldn't want you to think that this other Mr. Rogers; Craig; is me. He's not. He's someone completely different and I would never say the things he's saying.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2004, 08:07:00 AM »
Thank you Mr. Rogers. My my, it is beautiful here. The birds are singing, the sun is shining.. What a wonderfull day in the neighborhood.

Oh yeah, Fuck You Craig.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline GregFL

  • Posts: 2841
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2004, 11:07:00 AM »
This site is getting hilarious.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troubled Turd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 270
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2004, 12:44:00 PM »
THERE AIN'T A GODDAMN THING FUNNY HERE!!  :flame:
WHIP 'EM!!! WHIP THEIR GODDAMN LITTLE DRUGGIE ASSES!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2004, 10:08:00 PM »
:nworthy:  :nworthy:  :nworthy:  :nworthy:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #8 on: April 07, 2004, 04:43:00 PM »
understand that the credentials for Mr. CraigRogers look good however as an iverstigative reporter twho has just started looking into his facility I have found that speaking directly with people he has worked with in the past is the best source of information. If you check into he claims of previus employment you will find that to be correct however you will also find that they emphatically would not employ him again and will not be linked inany way to his facility. I believe that speaks volumes in itself. Though they did not reveal any information that they legally should not reveal they did guide me to other sources of information that should prove to be more than interesting. Though I am an unbiased individual in this scenario I am to seriously question the validity of this facility and any of its practices. And if any onbe knows why they move the kids t the Mexico facility approx. once a month could you please enlighten me. It almost appears as if they have something to hide. :smile:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Kiwi

  • Posts: 173
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2004, 06:20:00 PM »
Quote
understand that the credentials for Mr. CraigRogers look good however as an iverstigative reporter twho has just started looking into his facility I have found that speaking directly with people he has worked with in the past is the best source of information. If you check into he claims of previus employment you will find that to be correct however you will also find that they emphatically would not employ him again and will not be linked inany way to his facility. I believe that speaks volumes in itself. Though they did not reveal any information that they legally should not reveal they did guide me to other sources of information that should prove to be more than interesting. Though I am an unbiased individual in this scenario I am to seriously question the validity of this facility and any of its practices. And if any onbe knows why they move the kids t the Mexico facility approx. once a month could you please enlighten me. It almost appears as if they have something to hide.


Usually, iverstigative(sic) reporters know how to type, spell and use punctuation.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2004, 06:56:00 PM »
Tis so true so maybe it was Craig who posted this as it has been suggested.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Craig Rogers
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2004, 08:09:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-03-30 21:05:00, Turd Of Wisdumb wrote:

"Craig Rogers, I - AM - VERY - DISAPPOINTED - IN YOU.... YOU EVIL MAN! Shame on you! SHAME!!!  :eek: "


The lace of intelligent conversation is demonstrative of the lace of intelligence.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »