Author Topic: Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA  (Read 56307 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #210 on: May 20, 2004, 11:20:00 PM »
What I learned about Texas is that there were (2001) few "regulations" for Ed Cons.

This is what I found:
(12) "Child-placing agency" means a person, including an organization, other than the natural parents or guardian of a child who plans for the placement of or places a child in a child-care facility, agency foster home, agency foster group home, or adoptive home.
(13) "Facilities" includes child-care facilities and child-placing agencies
 
42.041.  REQUIRED LICENSE OR ACCREDITATION (a)  No person may operate a child-care facility or child-placing agency without a license issued by the department or a certificate to operate under accreditation issued by the department under Subchapter E.
 
42.0425.  ASSESSMENT SERVICES (a)  The department by rule shall regulate assessment services provided by child-care facilities or child-placing agencies.  A child-care facility or child-placing agency may not provide assessment services unless specifically authorized by the department.  (b)  The department by rule shall establish minimum standards for assessment services.  The standards must provide that consideration is
given to the individual needs of a child, the appropriate place for provision of services, and the factors listed in Section 42.042(e).
(c)  In this section, "assessment services" means the determination of the placement needs of a child who requires substitute care.  


Good luck getting anyone to enforce the law.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #211 on: May 25, 2004, 12:58:00 PM »
There has been a preliminary hearing in this case, see TAUSA website for details and future updates.

http://www.teenadvocatesusa.homestead.c ... Ahome.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline cherish wisdom

  • Posts: 586
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #212 on: May 25, 2004, 07:24:00 PM »
Here's the post from the Deseret News...

CEDAR CITY -- With tears in his eyes, Sean Graham's father approached Anson Arnett's mother, held her hand and offered his deepest apologies. As everyone exited the courtroom Monday, Jesse Simmons' father also offered his condolences.

Sean Graham and Jesse Simmons, both 17, are accused of killing Anson Arnett, their Maximum Life Skills Academy counselor. The two, who are charged with aggravated murder, are accused of beating Arnett with an aluminum baseball bat. They also are charged with aggravated kidnapping because they reportedly injured him and locked him in a closet after the alleged assault. The two also are charged with theft of an operable vehicle, for allegedly stealing the group home van, and theft, for reportedly stealing the television and other items from the house. Both are being charged as adults.

Although apologies were extended to the Arnett family, Anson's younger brother Abraham has opinions different from his parents, and he is concerned that justice will be served.

"It's not about vengeance, it's about justice, and the people involved taking responsibility for their actions," he said.

At the preliminary hearing Monday in 5th District Court, Judge G. Michael Westfall found probable cause that there was a vehicle stolen and that the crime of theft took place. However, he said he will not rule on the two aggravated charges until June 9.

"Intent is one of the elements I want to hear about," Westfall said Monday. Simmons' attorney, Steven McCaughy, suggested that written briefs be submitted to the judge because the elements he was concerned about were so substantial to the case. Graham's attorney, Douglas Terry, agreed.

Iron County Attorney Scott Garrett respected the judge's decision, but he said he thought the judge disregarded the fact that a preliminary hearing only requires probable cause to bind defendants over, and all inferences should be resolved in favor of the state.

"My only concern is this is merely a probable cause hearing," Garrett told the judge. "I think we may be misrepresenting the proceedings. I don't believe it's the function of the court to sift through or weigh out the evidence at this stage."

The judge's decisions came after testimony from a long list of witnesses, including two group home residents who witnessed the attack.

The first witness, a 16-year-old boy from Colorado, said Simmons hid behind a 4-foot wall while Anson Arnett walked up the stairs. Graham, who was also hiding near the stairs, gave Simmons a look when Arnett approached, and Simmons swung the aluminum bat at Arnett's head, he said.

The second witness, a 16-year-old boy from California, gave mirroring testimony.

Both boys said that Anson Arnett was hit twice with the bat, and after the second hit, Graham and Simmons locked Arnett in a closet.

Jake Truman, who was an employee of Maximum Life Skills Academy at the time of the attack, got involved in the situation when the two witnesses ran to his house for help, once Simmons and Graham had fled in the van.

"When we got the closet door open, I saw his condition ... and called 911," Truman said. "His legs were in the air, and he was propped against the file cabinet. He had difficulty breathing, and he had foam coming from his mouth."

State Medical Examiner Maureen Frikke testified that Arnett's injuries were consistent with a blow to the head, and they could have come from being struck with a bat.

"He was struck from the back, the head accelerated forward and rebounded," she said. "The brain bounced inside of his skull, which resulted in tearing the brain from the skull."

As Arnett's father, Perry, listened to the testimony, the pain he felt for his son's injuries and death was visible.

"It's not easy. It's far more complex then I imagined," Perry Arnett said.

Perry Arnett could not say what he hopes will come as a result of the legal proceedings in his son's death.

"I don't have an answer at this point," he said. "The law has taken so much away from the victims that I can only really stand on the side and watch."

Note: It seems it may have helped if someone had removed him from the closet right away instead of waiting two hours.  Why the wait?  

Our country right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right.
--Carl Schurz, German-born U.S. general and U.S. senator

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
If you lack wisdom ask of God and it shall be given to you.\"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #213 on: May 25, 2004, 09:22:00 PM »
This is really a sad sad situation but it's good to know Anson's brother is concerned about justice and not vengeance.  Also like the fact that the judge is reserving judgment until more evidence is presented on the question of intent.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #214 on: May 26, 2004, 01:10:00 AM »
Will they get a fair trial? I don't know. It seems the judge is being very careful. I still want to know why the staff member just didn't call 911 right away - before he went to check things out. It seems they were trying to cover this all up or perhaps the staff member didn't believe the boys who came to his house.  Why did Anson go back in the house after he went outside? It seems it was the second blow that did the most damage.  There are so many of these escape plans - this happens all of the time because the program kids are severely punished all of the time and they feel trapped.  It seems that the two hour lapse of time may have mad a difference.  This is such a sad situation.
This happened because the authorities in Utah will look the other way when programs are violating laws, codes and ordinances. They do this because they don't want to interfere in the financial viability of these programs. They provide much needed revenue - and it's all about MONEY. This could have been prevented if the facility was not in violation of rules. The same is true for every other death. Still these programs continue to proliferate without governmental oversight, regulation or inspection. When reports of violations and abuse come in - the authorities ignor them.  
So there's been another death. There will be more because nothing has changed. The people of Utah need to take a stand against facilities that are violating laws.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #215 on: May 26, 2004, 01:57:00 AM »
2 staff members should have been on duty that night.  End of story.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #216 on: May 27, 2004, 05:56:00 PM »
I am here today to clear up some things that you people have come up w/.  What wild stories we tell even though we seriously have no clue and go upon what the media and others pretend to know...Although infact that yes, this program was under many violations and frequently we ran away from the licensers whenever there was only one staff on duty, I do have to admit that I myself have been helped in many ways that makes me a better person today.  All the kids yes, knew that this program was a huge money scheme and hated being there, but of course, we always joked about getting out, never once had we thought to go beyond just that, thinking about it.  I knew Sean and Jesse very well infact, and shared many stories and fun times w/ them.  I also considered myself a friend to Anson Arnett, for we would spend many days talking about Art, life, music and anything that ever came up.  He was a beautiful human being and would never have thought to either RAPE, ABUSE, or HARM any of us in any way possible.  What happened was a terible tragedy and something that I will never forget.  All Anson Arnett ever wanted to do, was help, and be able to become friends w/ us all.  You people who think that you can judge such a nice and beautiful person w/o ever knowing him, need to get checked up yourselves.  How dare you think yourself high enough to come up w/ such radical equations as to what happened that night.  I believe in my good mind that Adam was indeed dedicated to helping all of us, and not stocking up on his bank account.  I had a great friendship w/ this man and have no ill feelings about him.  

O yea, to finally get this straight, getting Anson Arnett medical attention any sooner then we did, unfortunately would not have helped his survival.  So stop biting our asses, we tryed as hard as we could, and for a boy who has never been put in this situation, and that would never have expected this to ever happen, do you expect me to know what to do, to think and to feel??  Come on, think...Next time you are a witness to a murder case, and are in a diferent state, knowing no one but your gaurdians, and never seeing this before, you tell me what you would do.  Most of you dont have enough drama in your lives, or just have too much time in your boring lives, that you have to try and create more drama for the people who tried there hardest to get help and STAY ALIVE THEMSELVES!!  Next time you want to know about something and don't have all the facts, just wait, they will all be revealed to you in good time...The world we all live in can be beautiful and nasty, people that make more drama for everyone else are the nasty ones and make it harder for us all to live and love.  Hopefully I have changed some of your minds about what happened that terrible night.  As you all should know, I can not under any circumstances discuss this case so please, don't bother to ask.  I do wish things could have gone differently but unfortunately, as we all know, time can not be changed.  I have learned greatly from this experience and will always remember this loving and beautiful human being that was, Anson Arnett.  Thank you for listening...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #217 on: May 27, 2004, 06:36:00 PM »
Well, one thing for certain, there should have been 2 staff members on duty that "terrible night" and there wasn't.  Just Anson, all by himself, fullfilling his duties and responsibilities with no help from his 24 year old employer and the owner of the youth home, Mr. Adam AhQuin.

Tell me, how does AhQuin sleep at night knowing he was in violation of at least 15 DHS licensing rules, including one of the most important (having 2 staff members on duty AT ALL TIMES)?

Why wasn't AhQuin working himself that night? Where was he?????
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #218 on: May 27, 2004, 09:12:00 PM »
It was good to hear from one of the witnesses to this sad situation. There is much more to this story - and we don't have enought information because the authorities in Utah are keeping a lid on everything. There could be many other factors that led to this. One thing is for certain - there were violations of licensing laws and probably other violations that we are not aware of.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #219 on: May 28, 2004, 01:07:00 AM »
Well, one thing for certain, there should have been 2 staff members on duty that "terrible night" and there wasn't. Just Anson, all by himself, fullfilling his duties and responsibilities with no help from his 24 year old employer and the owner of the youth home, Mr. Adam AhQuin.

Tell me, how does AhQuin sleep at night knowing he was in violation of at least 15 DHS licensing rules, including one of the most important (having 2 staff members on duty AT ALL TIMES)?

Why wasn't AhQuin working himself that night? Where was he?????

---------------------

Well?? Where WAS Mr. AhQuin?  Shouldn't somebody be trying to answer this very important question?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #220 on: May 28, 2004, 06:05:00 PM »
The man was murdered and the murderers should be tried as such regardless of their age. There is no excuse for murder unless your life is in danger. This man chose a career that he thought might enable him to help teens and got killed for it. I do not agree with these program and especially not the desert programs but that does not mean the counselors who hire on to try and make a difference in a child's life should be punished.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #221 on: May 28, 2004, 06:18:00 PM »
Anon, you are missing the point. This counselor should NOT have been working alone that night, or any other night.  Why was this allowed to happen?  Where was the owner?  Why wasn't HE or another staff member on duty that night?  Don't you think that might have made a difference?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #222 on: May 28, 2004, 08:06:00 PM »
You're allowed to kill in self-defense if you're in imminent dander of death or serious bodily harm, including rape.

Given the history of the programs, I don't think we should be rushing to judgment.

If it was murder 1, or murder 2, or manslaughter, or justifiable homicide, we just don't know till a jury decides.

I know friends and family who know the deceased say what a great guy he was---but so did the people who knew Ted Bundy or any of a number of other monstrous people---including all the parish priests and church officials who diddled all those boys.  We all heard what great guys they were from people who thought they knew them well, too.

Maybe the deceased was just what the people who were close to him say.  Maybe he was something darker.

So far we're only hearing one side.  We won't hear both sides until it goes before a jury.

Rushing to judgement would be a bad thing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #223 on: May 29, 2004, 06:31:00 PM »
Legally there are certain conditions that must be met before one can be found guilty of premeditated murder.  To be guilty of this crime there must be the intent to kill - it must be planned out and executed. The big question is this: Did the boys desire to kill and end the life of Anson.  It seems they wanted to knock him unconscious to enable them to escape from this facility that was keeping them there against their will.  They were apparently in a lock-down situation - a private prison that they felt they needed to escape from. It seems, from all I've read, that they wished to escape and part of the plan was to knock Anson out.  If they wanted to actually kill him with the bat they would have continued to beat on him until there was no life left.  Here they hit him twice - when he was knocked out they put him in a closet. Apparently they thought he was still alive and would regain consciouness and foil their escape, so they put him in a closet and locked him in.  If they INTENDED to kill him - they very well could have done that by beating him until he was dead - then they would have had no reason to put him in the closet to prevent him for regaining consciousness and foiling their escape.  

Could this have been prevented with two guard on? Of course.  Obviously these boys knew that there was only one person on at night - this had been going on for quite some time.

Even attempted murder required the intent to actually KILL.  In this case it seems this intent was lacking. In fact, they were shocked when they found out that he had died. It is clear that they did not desire to actually kill him.

The legal requirements for assault are definitely there - but the legal requirements for murder or even attempted murder are not.

They did kill someone - but it is clear they lacked the requisite intent to kill - therefore what they did could not be first degee murder. Escaping from an abusive private youth prison is not a felony.  This was a private home. They stole the vehicle to get away in.  

This was an escape attempt that turned deadly. Some children have died in an attempt to escape.
One need not wonder why they wished to escape. They had been in a lock down for nearly a year and their hopes at getting out were dashed because Ah Quin said they cheated on a test - so they had to stay for months longer (at a combined cost of $10,000 per month). This is common place - all of these programs do this - they do it for financial reasons.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Breaking News Story on Teen Advocates USA
« Reply #224 on: May 29, 2004, 07:43:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-05-29 15:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Legally there are certain conditions that must be met before one can be found guilty of premeditated murder.  To be guilty of this crime there must be the intent to kill - it must be planned out and executed. The big question is this: Did the boys desire to kill and end the life of Anson.  It seems they wanted to knock him unconscious to enable them to escape from this facility that was keeping them there against their will.  They were apparently in a lock-down situation - a private prison that they felt they needed to escape from. It seems, from all I've read, that they wished to escape and part of the plan was to knock Anson out.  If they wanted to actually kill him with the bat they would have continued to beat on him until there was no life left.  Here they hit him twice - when he was knocked out they put him in a closet. Apparently they thought he was still alive and would regain consciouness and foil their escape, so they put him in a closet and locked him in.  If they INTENDED to kill him - they very well could have done that by beating him until he was dead - then they would have had no reason to put him in the closet to prevent him for regaining consciousness and foiling their escape.  



Could this have been prevented with two guard on? Of course.  Obviously these boys knew that there was only one person on at night - this had been going on for quite some time.



Even attempted murder required the intent to actually KILL.  In this case it seems this intent was lacking. In fact, they were shocked when they found out that he had died. It is clear that they did not desire to actually kill him.



The legal requirements for assault are definitely there - but the legal requirements for murder or even attempted murder are not.



They did kill someone - but it is clear they lacked the requisite intent to kill - therefore what they did could not be first degee murder. Escaping from an abusive private youth prison is not a felony.  This was a private home. They stole the vehicle to get away in.  



This was an escape attempt that turned deadly. Some children have died in an attempt to escape.

One need not wonder why they wished to escape. They had been in a lock down for nearly a year and their hopes at getting out were dashed because Ah Quin said they cheated on a test - so they had to stay for months longer (at a combined cost of $10,000 per month). This is common place - all of these programs do this - they do it for financial reasons.  "


Absolutely agree with everything you say, Anon.  What do you think about AhQuin apparently not facing any CRIMINAL charges, himself?  Is this because he violated a STATE licensing rule, not federal or criminal law?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »