« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0  (Read 5284 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #30 on: August 07, 2004, 12:59:00 PM »
" And 95%, or "beyond a reasonable doubt" is what you have to prove for a criminal conviction.

Then, even if you have a 95% level of proof that it happened, for criminal court you have to be able to prove not just that it happened, but who did what to whom, and when, and which laws it broke, and that the statute of limitations has not expired on it. "

I'm not a lawyer either - but I think this can be done  -
No problem.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #31 on: August 07, 2004, 01:11:00 PM »
"I was there, and I know what went down, and she has presented a very warped and twisted version of events."

Did she testify?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #32 on: August 07, 2004, 01:16:00 PM »
Er....their.

Sorry.  I was typing too fast.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #33 on: August 07, 2004, 02:33:00 PM »
""I was there, and I know what went down, and she has presented a very warped and twisted version of events."

Did she testify? "

No she didn't. They used a few of her emails they got off her hard drive but that was her total contribution. And I'll tell ya - it turned out to be a huge mistake on their part - IMO - as it allowed a lot of testimony I'm sure they'd rather have kept out, in.

The sentence you quote above was in reference to her behavior on the support group list, and why she was put off.

their/there
I do that all the time.
:wink:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #34 on: August 07, 2004, 02:37:00 PM »
Did the court say that it's okay to post lies all over the internet now?  Or is that out of their jurisdiction? Anyone can take a story and twist it to suit their purposes. My interpretation is that it's a scare site.  It helps the parents be scared into thinking they will get "better" information.

PURE is still making money by using their site to convince parents they are "better."  They are not Educational Consultants, however, I don't see a disclaimer or a note that says they have not taken the course or become certified to tell you what is best for your child in the way of treatment.

Obviously the members of the jury have never had a child in a program.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
P.U.R.E ....1 WWASPS....0
« Reply #35 on: August 07, 2004, 02:48:00 PM »
Obviously the members of the jury have never had a child in a program.

Who says?
Maybe they have had - the sworn testimony that took place would have scarred them shitless.
I know it had them crying.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »