On 2005-01-12 10:11:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Isac is just opinions, not facts. Like this board."
ISAC provides some facts. Specifically, when parents dealing with programs, and they have a dispute, ISAC can help provide information for their lawyer about what legal strategies have worked in other courts in the past---which saves their lawyer time, and saves the parents money.
Also, people's personal experiences are not opinions, they're allegations, and they're eyewitness testimony.
Whether a person believes them versus the program's assertions and testimonials or not is his or her decision.
But they're not mere opinions, someone's statements about their own personal experience in particular programs is actual evidence. What weight a person gives that evidence, whether someone personally finds a particular witness credible or not, *is* individual opinion.
And citations to studies and findings of various organizations are facts. Courtroom determinations and citations thereto are facts. Citations to news articles about deaths, prosecutions, and closings of facilities by government authorities are facts.
That you would classify all this different stuff together, higgeldy-piggeldy, as "opinion" tells me that you're either evaluating it on a very shallow level or that you don't have much experience supporting your positions on a subject with evidence and reason.
This isn't a purely black or white issue.
There are people of all ages who need residential care so badly they really need to be involuntarily committed. There are people of all ages who don't absolutely require involuntary commitment, but who would benefit from proper treatment in a residential setting. There are people of all ages who do bad things and deserve incarceration to protect other people and their property from them.
There's good residential treatment and there's bad residential treatment and there's mediocre residential treatment.
There's proper incarceration with due process that respects the prisoner's basic human rights, and there's abusive incarceration that needs improvement. There are variations of severity of abuses.
It's not a black and white issue.
There are shades of gray, and only an absolutely fanatical ideologue would maintain that *all* residential treatment or incarceration should be shut down (and I know of *nobody* here who advocates that), and only an absolutely fanatical ideologue would maintain that the programs *don't* need improvements in certain areas and better oversight to ensure quality of care.
That the programs fight absolutely tooth and nail against the idea that any facility that holds and treats children should have to be licensed by the state and periodically inspected to ensure it meets standards makes them look like irrational, crooked fanatics.
If they don't want to wear the label, then they need to start being *reasonable* about basic licensing and oversight.
Timoclea
You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence.
--Charles Austin Beard