Author Topic: Danny Bennison blows Whooter!  (Read 17032 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #60 on: September 02, 2010, 10:47:31 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
You're still dodging your own actions Whooter. Own up to things quickly. There is no earlier post because you were the original source. There's nothing to reference back because you lied about their being an earlier conversation. You thought by posting anonymously and later referencing your own post logged in you'd be covered. Looks like you slipped up again Whooter. You had a conversation with Function Junction, you claimed he gave you information regarding me including details of my stay at HLA. Take a look:

Quote
by TheWho » Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:59 am

"RobertBruce" wrote:
Now Cindy do you know for a fact I was never abused while at HLA?

If so how?

Actually, I do know you were never abused. Someone gave me the low down on you via a PM. Half the stuff you say is lies, but I knew that first hand from what you have posted here.

Explain yourself Whooter, quickly.

So it was Function junction that was saying that?  I remember him.  He was trolling DJ big time.  So this Function Junction guy PM's me and told me most of what you said was lies?  I sort of remember that.  but I knew already that you were trolling me and making things up.
Thats funny......  Remember Deborah would get made and split the threads off everytime you came along and started trolling me.  I remember that you would always ask people questions but never answered any yourself and then you would hound them.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #61 on: September 02, 2010, 10:57:06 PM »
Function Junction was smarter than you Whooter. He used you to do his dirty work for him. He knew we already had his ip address and that it showed he was posting from HLA. If he gave out personal information regarding a former inmate ORS would have been on him in a second for violating HIPPA laws. Instead he found a stoolie in you to do it for him. He gave you information he claimed concerned me. You readily accepted it and jumped at the opportunity to think you were holding something over my head. Since that time you've made repeated references to information you think you have on me, while crying whenever the same is done to you or your fellow child abuse supporters.


Explain yourself quickly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #62 on: September 02, 2010, 11:05:08 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Function Junction was smarter than you Whooter. He used you to do his dirty work for him. He knew we already had his ip address and that it showed he was posting from HLA. If he gave out personal information regarding a former inmate ORS would have been on him in a second for violating HIPPA laws. Instead he found a stoolie in you to do it for him. He gave you information he claimed concerned me. You readily accepted it and jumped at the opportunity to think you were holding something over my head. Since that time you've made repeated references to information you think you have on me, while crying whenever the same is done to you or your fellow child abuse supporters.


Explain yourself quickly.

Again I think you are drinking, Bruce.  I think if you go back and look at the posts you will see that this Function guy was trolling DJ.  I am not even sure I was involved in that troll session.  



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #63 on: September 02, 2010, 11:10:47 PM »
Your own posts proves that you were Whooter. Everyone here knows that you hate accountability, but luckily you've been blocked from editing any more of your posts. It's right there for anyone to see and you can't do a thing about it. You made the comments to me after you spoke with Function Junction. Don't try and avoid respondsibility Whooter.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #64 on: September 02, 2010, 11:19:46 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Your own posts proves that you were Whooter.

Ahhh, no they dont.  Its all in your mind, Bruce.  All my posts have been linked together, remember?


 
Quote
Everyone here knows that you hate accountability,

Actually it is just the opposite

Quote
but luckily you've been blocked from editing any more of your posts.

No luck involved.  I asked Psy to lock the posts and out of fairness I will refrain from editing any posts I still have control over.


Quote
It's right there for anyone to see and you can't do a thing about it. You made the comments to me after you spoke with Function Junction. Don't try and avoid respondsibility Whooter.

Exactly, Bruce, it is all here for everyone to see and I take responsibility for my words.  



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #65 on: September 02, 2010, 11:34:08 PM »
Quote
Ahhh, no they dont. Its all in your mind, Bruce. All my posts have been linked together, remember?

Which is why the post has your name on the top of it. Are you still of the mindset that if you deny an obvious truth long enough you can make it not so? I know you have trouble with reading comprehension so let me break it down for you:

Event 1) You fully acknowledged receiving a PM with information purported to be about me. You attempted to blackmail me into taking your side regarding an issue and were somehow incapable of understanding my repeated assertions that your information was invalid and your threat was meaningless, and I simply didnt care.

Event 2) You then later claimed anonymously that an earlier conversation had taken place detailing the information you had been given. You did so despite the fact that no such earlier conversation existed, nor was there any previous reference to it.

Event 3) You when logged in began citing yourself as your own source in an effort to avoid respondsibility.

Event 4) You still currently make reference to infomation you believe you have on me and my incarceration at HLA. You refuse to ever back up your claims because doing so would expose your double standard.

Event 5) Your anonymous postings were exposed and you have been proven to be a hypocrit.


Stop avoidigng accountability and explain yourself. Quickly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #66 on: September 02, 2010, 11:40:40 PM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
Quote
Ahhh, no they dont. Its all in your mind, Bruce. All my posts have been linked together, remember?

Which is why the post has your name on the top of it. Are you still of the mindset that if you deny an obvious truth long enough you can make it not so? I know you have trouble with reading comprehension so let me break it down for you:

Event 1) You fully acknowledged receiving a PM with information purported to be about me. You attempted to blackmail me into taking your side regarding an issue and were somehow incapable of understanding my repeated assertions that your information was invalid and your threat was meaningless, and I simply didnt care.

Event 2) You then later claimed anonymously that an earlier conversation had taken place detailing the information you had been given. You did so despite the fact that no such earlier conversation existed, nor was there any previous reference to it.

Event 3) You when logged in began citing yourself as your own source in an effort to avoid respondsibility.

Event 4) You still currently make reference to infomation you believe you have on me and my incarceration at HLA. You refuse to ever back up your claims because doing so would expose your double standard.

Event 5) Your anonymous postings were exposed and you have been proven to be a hypocrit.


Stop avoidigng accountability and explain yourself. Quickly.


LOL,  The pm I received was from someone telling me not to believe what you say and that you were not being truthful.  If you dont stop this right now I am going to release all your personal information on the open forum... including photographs of your pets, do you hear me?

Oh,no!!!  Is that Blackmail?  

Grow-up Bruce.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #67 on: September 03, 2010, 12:04:10 AM »
Quote
LOL, The pm I received was from someone telling me not to believe what you say and that you were not being truthful. If you dont stop this right now I am going to release all your personal information on the open forum... including photographs of your pets, do you hear me?

Oh,no!!! Is that Blackmail?

Grow-up Bruce.

Knock yourself out Whooter, Pugsley is quite photogenic and would probably be flattered that you cyber stalk him.

You don't have personal information about me, you never did. You never got that not only were you being used, but that the joke was on you.

You've tried to gloat with this information far too much to try your usual back pedaling. There's no where for you to go Whooter, you're nothing more than a sad mess. You've got mud all over your face and there's still nothing you can do about it. Clean yourself up, you're about to be forced to owning up to your actions for the first time in your life. You will acknolwedge your actions or you will deal with the consequences.

You have repeatedly on this forum claimed that I was only locked up in HLA for 'a few weeks' ,cite your source Whooter. You're either making it up, or someone gave you the information. You've made numerous claims to recieving information about me concerning my time in HLA, so it sounds like the latter. Explain yourself.

You openly claimed on this forum and via PM's that I was bisexual. You even went so far as to say you had been given the information via a PM from another poster. Again, explain yourself quickly.


Time to man up son.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #68 on: September 03, 2010, 07:44:46 AM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
You don't have personal information about me, you never did. You never got that not only were you being used, but that the joke was on you.

You've tried to gloat with this information far too much to try your usual back pedaling. There's no where for you to go Whooter, you're nothing more than a sad mess. You've got mud all over your face and there's still nothing you can do about it. Clean yourself up, you're about to be forced to owning up to your actions for the first time in your life. You will acknolwedge your actions or you will deal with the consequences.

So you don’t like it when people gloat?  How about if a person says they have pictures of my kids, my address and phone number and threaten to put it out on the forum.  How about when they actually did place it on the forum.  When all this transpired people like you had a good time.  I have been through this several times myself,  Bruce, you never did so stop your crying.

Quote
You have repeatedly on this forum claimed that I was only locked up in HLA for 'a few weeks' ,cite your source Whooter.

I will say it again, Bruce, You only attended HLA for a few weeks, quit your belly aching.  Many kids were there for over a year.  It was defined earlier on fornits that you need to stay in a program for 30 days or more to be able to claim the classification of survivor.  As always you fell short.

Quote
You're either making it up, or someone gave you the information. You've made numerous claims to recieving information about me concerning my time in HLA, so it sounds like the latter. Explain yourself.

Several people told me.  They also said you lied a lot, Bruce, is this true?

Quote
You openly claimed on this forum and via PM's that I was bisexual. You even went so far as to say you had been given the information via a PM from another poster. Again, explain yourself quickly.

I don’t care if you are bisexual or not.  Why are you so fixated on this topic.  I will PM you telling you that you are bisexual again if you like or I can tell you openly on this forum.  I will bribe you into agreeing with me, or I will release the fact that you didn’t attend a program for very long!!  Lol It doesn’t matter to me.
Again all my posts are linked up.  If there is one or several that bother you then give us all a link to it and we can take a look.
Do you want to see where people put my personal info out on the forum?

Note:  You have a tendency to want to discuss things ad nauseum.  I am not going to continue to entertain you with your problems.  If you have a post where I trolled you then place it up.  No more questions.  Okay Bob?



« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline RobertBruce

  • Posts: 4290
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #69 on: September 03, 2010, 08:03:05 AM »
So what you're saying is, is that you never had anything and are a liar?

Not a surprise there John, everyone already knew this about you. It's not a mystery anymore than the fact that you killed your son and locked the other one way.

I was in HLA for over a year John, I can prove it, and you can't prove anything to the contrary.

While I take no issue with those who are bisexual, I myself am not, nor have I ever been. The fact that you were told this by an HLA staff member is only further testament to the fact that the therapy and diagnosis plans given there were given out by unqualified, unlicensed hacks. In addition to further proving that both you and Buch are fine circumventing the laws, so long as it helps your kiddie abusing industry. It also only goes to highlight your stupidity, bias and naivity. You jumped at the chance to have what you felt was negative information about a anti program poster. You never actually sought out the truth in anything.

You're done John, you've got no evidence to back up any of your claims and you've been forced to eat crow once again. Clean yourself up you slob. The next time you make any unfounded claim about anyone or anything without backing it up I'm going to start dropping info Max shared with me.


Be very careful Johnny. You started this game and then you got what was coming to you. Don't cry about it now.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #70 on: September 03, 2010, 08:13:21 AM »
Quote from: "RobertBruce"
The next time you make any unfounded claim about anyone or anything without backing it up I'm going to start dropping info Max shared with me.


Be very careful Johnny. You started this game and then you got what was coming to you. Don't cry about it now.

Oh No!!  
Claim 1:  You were only in HLA for a few weeks.  You need to have a minimum of 30 days to be able to claim the title of survivor.  These rules were established 7 years ago by a special committee of fornits admins.  You came up short again.

Claim 2: You talk about your sexuality all over the forum and then blame everyone else if they comment on it.  You did this with Function Junction and many others.  No one is really interested, Bob.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Botched Programming

  • Posts: 1197
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #71 on: September 03, 2010, 08:52:09 AM »
Quote from: "Whooter"

Claim 1:  You were only in HLA for a few weeks.  You need to have a minimum of 30 days to be able to claim the title of survivor.  These rules were established 7 years ago by a special committee of fornits admins.  You came up short again.


...

When did you become an authoritive on Survivor status... Please provide link proving your statement on Admins ruling on Survivor status...

Peace
 :peace:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #72 on: September 03, 2010, 08:59:08 AM »
Quote from: "Botched Programming"
Quote from: "Whooter"

Claim 1:  You were only in HLA for a few weeks.  You need to have a minimum of 30 days to be able to claim the title of survivor.  These rules were established 7 years ago by a special committee of fornits admins.  You came up short again.


...

When did you become an authoritive on Survivor status... Pleas provide link proving your statement on Admins ruling on Survivor status...

Peace
 :peace:

It was a secret meeting held in an abandoned burned out gulag on a very stormy night about 7 years ago.  The reason I remember it so well is because I was very upset that night that I was not invited to the meeting.  Only a few select fornits posters and admins attended and (among other definitions) they came up with a 30 day minimum stay to be considered a survivor.  You could still speak about your experiences, but you couldnt claim the title.  They are a very secret society so everyone will deny that they exist, but they do enforce the rules regardless.



...





...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Botched Programming

  • Posts: 1197
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #73 on: September 03, 2010, 09:03:23 AM »
Quote from: "Whooter"
Quote from: "Botched Programming"
Quote from: "Whooter"

Claim 1:  You were only in HLA for a few weeks.  You need to have a minimum of 30 days to be able to claim the title of survivor.  These rules were established 7 years ago by a special committee of fornits admins.  You came up short again.


...

When did you become an authoritive on Survivor status... Pleas provide link proving your statement on Admins ruling on Survivor status...

Peace
 :peace:

It was a secret meeting held in an abandoned burned out gulag on a very stormy night about 7 years ago.  I remember it well because I was upset that I was not invited.  Only a few select fornits posters and admins attended and (among other definitions) they came up with a 30 day minimum stay to be considered a survivor.  You could still speak about your experiences, but you couldnt claim the title.  They are a very secret society so everyone will deny that they exist, but they do enforce the rules regardless.



...





...
:rocker:

No link... No proof... Your words must be taken as here say... which is not evidence proving your point!!!
 :seg:

Peace
 :peace:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Whooter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5513
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: .
« Reply #74 on: September 03, 2010, 09:11:21 AM »
Quote from: "Botched Programming"
Quote from: "Whooter"
Quote from: "Botched Programming"
Quote from: "Whooter"

Claim 1:  You were only in HLA for a few weeks.  You need to have a minimum of 30 days to be able to claim the title of survivor.  These rules were established 7 years ago by a special committee of fornits admins.  You came up short again.


...

When did you become an authoritive on Survivor status... Pleas provide link proving your statement on Admins ruling on Survivor status...

Peace
 :peace:

It was a secret meeting held in an abandoned burned out gulag on a very stormy night about 7 years ago.  I remember it well because I was upset that I was not invited.  Only a few select fornits posters and admins attended and (among other definitions) they came up with a 30 day minimum stay to be considered a survivor.  You could still speak about your experiences, but you couldnt claim the title.  They are a very secret society so everyone will deny that they exist, but they do enforce the rules regardless.



...





...
:rocker:

No link... No proof... Your words must be taken as here say... which is not evidence proving your point!!!
 :seg:

Peace
 :peace:

I take it from your post that you were not invited either,Botched.   Its a sucky feeling I know.  But I see what you are saying.  Maybe we can make an exception and make RobertBruce an honorary survivor by including the time he spends here on fornits abusing and trolling fellow posters as time spent in the field.  If we added 10 days to his time at HLA he would tip the scales at 31 days.

I vote to help the little fellow out.  If no one disagrees or objects then it will become official in 24 hours from this post.



...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »