Maybe i'm missing something here. Apart from the circumstantial, what exactly is the proof that this guy is "theWho".
"It" admits to being Reuben in a thread on the Aspen forum. He mentioned a Who show in Philadelphia, 1973. John Reuben went to Valley Forge Military Academy in PA, and his age at the time jibes with how old the who says he was.
Still. If you read over Who's posts from around Sept. 21, 2008 when Michael Reuben died it does not seem like anything is amiss. Which is kind of scary if he really is Reuben, 'cos that shows a truly desensitized individual.
Even if he isn't the who, this Reuben guy is an ass. The paid death announcements with STICC's web address are worthy of Sue Scheff, and Lon Woodbury's presence on the board speaks for itself. A lot of people think the who is more than one person, and I have to agree after reading the who's first postings and later drivel. There are style changes, one who is prone to being pissy and defensive of Lon Woodbury. Sometimes the who came off as a barely literate.
Maybe STICC is the who and all the board members used "the who" to maintain near constant warfare on Fornits. It would make sense that Lon would take offense at being busted on and log in as the who to defend himself.
What a bunch of pigs in STICC. The who said he had no conflict of interest problems posting on Fornits, and no financial ties to the industry. Lon Woodbury's presence on the board ties STICC to the dirty money. Who wants to set up
sticcexposed.com? Every parent who felt sorry for this guy and his paid obits needs to read his postings as the who. His business associates should read his posts, too, to get a better idea of what kind of dude they are dealing with. Obviously he is ashamed of his postings.