General Interest > Tacitus' Realm
Islam’s Invasion Ideology...
Stonewall:
Islam’s Invasion Ideology
Friday, 01 October 2010 06:19 Martel Sobieskey
In the same way that a fake $100 bill is not legitimate currency, Islam is a counterfeit religion and therefore does not qualify for first amendment status. It is extremely incorrect to categorize Islam as a religion when its core literature and bloody track record prove a thousand times over that it is an -- Invasion ideology, a shrewd and cunning predator -- disguising itself as a religion.
Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused.
“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)
The Koran is a Manual of War
It is an error for anyone to call Islam a religion, but for those who insist, it’s best referred to as a “Religion of War” that has arrived on our shore as an enemy invader for the sole purpose of conquering our nation. This point cannot be overemphasized.
The Koran vows to vanquish all religions and nations worldwide. Allah himself is the protagonist who relishes the role of a “hit man” vowing to knock off every person who rejects Islam -- sending them to burn in everlasting hell. For Allah, there is nothing more heinous and loathsome than those infidels (non-believers) who refuse to convert, and there is nothing he will not do to eradicate them.
“I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off their fingers and toes.” (Koran 8:12)
“Allah wished to confirm the truth by his words: Wipe the infidels out to the last.” (Koran: 8:7)
Read the Koran for Yourself
Don’t take my word on it. Read the Koran. By so doing you will be outraged and ask, “Why in heavens name would any person with integrity and intellectual objectivity call such a blood thirsty and homicidally bigoted “tirade” -- a sacred and holy book?”
Below are two sources for authentic passages from the Koran. The first is entitled "Islamic Quotes" taken from prophetofdoom.net . It provides a few hundred quotes organized into 30 different categories and is very “digestible” giving immediate insight into the malevolence of the Koran and related Islamic texts. The second is an article by Citizen Warrior encouraging everyone to read the Koran, especially “An Abridged Koran” by CSPI. The advantage of the abridged version is that it eliminates monotonous repetition and provides commentary giving a comprehensive perspective and meaning to the text.
Neutralizing Islam
One does not need a crystal ball to foretell that Islam will turn America into a living hell if left unchecked. 9/11 was America’s initiation into the so called “religious rites” of Islam. Millions of Americans are outraged that the real culprit in this attack has been given a “free pass” to continue its rampage.
Since 9/11, the religion of peace website has documented 16,124 deadly attacks committed by Islam as mandated by the Koran. These prove that Islam does not deserve the status of a religion and that America has been hoodwinked by so doing. We need to face reality, and implement effective methods if we wish to protect our nation from this religious imposter.
One writer bringing clarity to the situation is Daniel Greenfield. In his article: “Can We Ban Islam? Legal Guidelines for the Criminalization of Islam in the United States” he states in the affirmative that America can legally ban Islam because:
“Organizations aimed at the overthrow of the United States can be banned and membership in them can even be criminalized.”
They key word here is “overthrow”. Any group that wishes to overthrow the United States can be banned. It is well past time for open debate and discussion upon this issue in regards to Islam.
To reiterate, Islam does not qualify for religion status in the USA because it an Invasion Ideology which absolutely mandates the conquest of the United States. Please see my related article entitled "Demoting Islam's Religion Status" it provides the basic elements for discussion and reflection. Also, a must see “you tube” video named "3 Things about Islam" provides a concise summary of the challenge we face. It is imperative for all Americans to learn the truth about Islam or it will eventually destroy us.
Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, and security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included.
Copyright © 2010 Right Side Publications, LLC
http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010100111 ... ology.html
Eliscu2:
:seg:
justonemore:
Well Done, Stony, Well Done!
Perhaps the story of the afghan girl whose nose and ears were cut off by her husband will begin to wake up westerners. Perhaps now we will begin to recognize the horror that we really , truly face. Maybe the 'feminists will come out of their closet and recognize evil for what it is. Maybe. Maybe people will begin to realize just how fragile the 'civiilzed' world really is, and remember the shoot-down on all grumman Ag-cats for four days after 9-11, or that all regional hospitals were on mandatory three- day lockdown, post event Maybe..
J.O.M.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "justonemore" ---Well Done, Stony, Well Done!
Perhaps the story of the afghan girl whose nose and ears were cut off by her husband will begin to wake up westerners.
--- End quote ---
I'm awake and it's deplorable what they do.
--- Quote --- Perhaps now we will begin to recognize the horror that we really , truly face. Maybe the 'feminists will come out of their closet and recognize evil for what it is. Maybe.
--- End quote ---
I think pulling out the 'feminist' card is unfair. The way that women are treated in a lot of Islamic countries is horrible. The way that the Mormoms view women is deplorable, although not as physically violent. The fundamentalist christians who think that women should "submit" to their husbands is deplorable and can lead to severe spousal abuses. I can't imagine having to live under that kind of rule. Thank god I don't have to.
--- Quote ---Maybe people will begin to realize just how fragile the 'civiilzed' world really is, and remember the shoot-down on all grumman Ag-cats for four days after 9-11, or that all regional hospitals were on mandatory three- day lockdown, post event Maybe..
J.O.M.
--- End quote ---
I'm not saying that what is being done in the name of that religion is right. Of course it's not. I don't like or agree with ANY religion and think they're ALL oppressive, especially when you read the text - be it the Bible, Koran or whatever. What I can't pretend to be afraid of is that they're going to somehow install their laws here or take over the country. It's just not gonna happen, IMO. It wasn't so long ago in this country that people were scared of Catholics. And I mean literally afraid that they were stockpiling weapons, waiting for a signal from the Pope to take over America.
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns ... cs/1127650
Sharon Davies
When America feared Catholics
By Sharon Davies, Los Angeles Times
In Print: Wednesday, October 13, 2010
The mind-set is all too familiar: A radical religious group, lurking inside the country, owing loyalty to a foreign power, threatens America. No one denies that its members have a right to worship as they please, but good Americans, patriots, feel compelled to call for curbs against the menace they present. Because of the number of Americans sharing these fears, calls for restrictions on the religion are voiced openly and unapologetically, even proudly.
Today this description may bring to mind the flap over the proposed Islamic cultural center near ground zero in New York, or recent calls for greater restrictions on Muslims in America, like banning their service on the Supreme Court or in the Oval Office. But in fact, it describes the year 1920, when the reviled group was Roman Catholics, not Muslims.
In the early 1900s, many Americans were genuinely frightened by the perceived religious threat of the Roman Catholic Church and the suspected imperialistic intentions of its leader, the pope. He was plotting the overthrow of the United States, warned the fearful, to "make America Catholic." His foot soldiers, tens of thousands of Catholic men who called themselves the Knights of Columbus, were busily stockpiling arms and ammunition in the basements of their churches, all in preparation for the day when their papist leader would give the signal for the violent insurrection to begin.
The holders of such beliefs were not just some fringe crazies. A number of state legislatures were persuaded to take steps against the perceived threat as well, mirroring the anti-Catholic fear in their "convent inspection laws." These laws authorized the warrantless searches of Catholic buildings — convents, monasteries, rectories and churches — for weaponry and for young women supposedly seduced into the nunnery by Catholic lies.
Religious fear on this scale had fatal consequences. Eighty-nine years ago in Birmingham, Ala., Father James E. Coyle was brutally slain. Coyle, a native of Ireland, had been sent to the United States to begin his priesthood. When he dared to stand up in defense of his faith, federal agents warned the bishop in Mobile about death threats on Coyle's life and pledges to torch his Birmingham church.
Such threats were not idle. During this same period, the popularity of the Ku Klux Klan exploded after it rebranded itself a "patriotic" fraternal organization dedicated to safeguarding America against the threat of Catholics, Jews and immigrants. This new klan attracted some of "the best men in town" — doctors, lawyers, judges, law enforcement officers, even clergymen.
On Aug. 11, 1921, one of those men — a Methodist minister, the Rev. Edwin R. Stephenson — brought a loaded gun to the porch of Coyle's home and shot him dead in front of a street full of witnesses. About an hour earlier, the priest had committed the apparently unforgivable act of marrying Stephenson's 18-year-old daughter to a practicing Catholic wallpaper hanger of Puerto Rican descent.
The KKK raised funds for Stephenson's defense and hired his lead attorney, a young future Supreme Court justice, Hugo Black. Black, it was hoped, might persuade a Southern jury to see Stephenson as the community's champion rather than a bigoted killer. You can guess the outcome.
Stephenson walked out of the courthouse a free man, and he never so much as apologized. Black joined the klan himself 18 months later and, with its support, was elected to the U.S. Senate. Only years later did he calmly state that he did not share the klan's beliefs and was no longer a member, after a reporter revealed his membership as he prepared to take his seat on the Supreme Court. Black survived the ensuing scandal.
At the time, these men did not consider themselves religious bigots. They believed themselves patriots protecting the nation against a foreign threat they feared was intent on their destruction.
The anti-Catholic fever of the 1920s didn't truly end for another 40 years, when presidential candidate John F. Kennedy felt compelled to say directly that his allegiance was to the United States, not the pope. Today, the worst of the anti-Catholic fervor might simply be an embarrassment, were the consequences less dire and were there not so many signs that we haven't learned from our mistakes.
Sharon Davies is a professor at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and the author of "Rising Road: A True Tale of Love, Race and Religion in America."
© 2010 Los Angeles Times
Eliscu2:
:seg:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version