General Interest > Tacitus' Realm
Here, have 91,000 classified Afghan War documents
Pile of Dead Kids:
Eliscu, were you as high as an ANA recruit when you posted that?
Yes, the situation's unwinnable. You'd think someone would have figured that out in 2004. If "victory" means leaving behind a stable country without an insurgency, then we'd have to kill absolutely everyone in Afghanistan, plus some more in Chechenya, Iran, and Pakistan, to achieve that, because these people are simply not going to make the kind of government we want them to make.
Stonewall:
--- Quote from: "Pile of Dead Kids" ---Eliscu, were you as high as an ANA recruit when you posted that?
Yes, the situation's unwinnable. You'd think someone would have figured that out in 2004. If "victory" means leaving behind a stable country without an insurgency, then we'd have to kill absolutely everyone in Afghanistan, plus some more in Chechenya, Iran, and Pakistan, to achieve that, because these people are simply not going to make the kind of government we want them to make.
--- End quote ---
But we won over Serbia when we joined the Jihad... Same over the Soviets.
When we join the Jihad, we win.
wdtony:
I know the US military has been having trouble in Afghanistan, which makes me wonder....
Why was the US military redirected to invade Iraq?
It was something about weapons of mass destruction I think. Were any ever found?
If we hadn't entered into a war in Iraq, the US military could have been successful in defeating the Taliban in Afghanistan before now.
I remember some people comparing the "war on terror" [sic] as being the next Vietnam. I didn't think it would escalate to what it is now.
It seems that the US may be in a state of perpetual warfare. Our economy, which is a mixed economy, (Capitalist/Socialist) cannot sustain these wars.
I hope somebody in our government has the smarts to get us out of this mess.
Back to the focus of eliminating child torture in the US.......
T-Rex:
--- Quote from: "Stonewall" ---
--- Quote from: "Pile of Dead Kids" ---http://wardiary.wikileaks.org
Our military is very good at killing hostiles it sees who are dumb enough to engage in a straight-up fight, but that doesn't stop the Taliban from basically owning the country anyway.
--- End quote ---
The Military is in a no-win situation because their mission is impossible to accomplish. They should not even have this mission. The last thing on peoples minds on 9/11 was how it would be so nice if Afghans could vote. I don't care about that country whatsoever. The government that we call our friend will kill their citizens for leaving Islam. That is what our soldiers are fighting and dying for.
--- End quote ---
thank you...
T-Rex:
--- Quote from: "Pile of Dead Kids" ---Eliscu, were you as high as an ANA recruit when you posted that?
Yes, the situation's unwinnable. You'd think someone would have figured that out in 2004. If "victory" means leaving behind a stable country without an insurgency, then we'd have to kill absolutely everyone in Afghanistan, plus some more in Chechenya, Iran, and Pakistan, to achieve that, because these people are simply not going to make the kind of government we want them to make.
--- End quote ---
Administration for Native Americans (ANA)?????????????????????
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version