Ginger makes the point that no paper is entirely "objective" I agree. I was raised in England at a time (before Murdoch) when you knew for sure the type of politics of each national newspaper -- The Telegraph -- Conservative; The Times -- Conservative; the Daily Mirror (working class -- Labour); The Guardian -- Liberal; The Daily Express((working Class - conservative); The Daily Herald (Unofficial voice of the Labour Party); News of the World (Sundays only -- dealt with sex scandals -- prurient interest); The Observer - (now amalgamated with The Guardian was thought of as fairly Conservative); The Daily Worker (Communist -- oh the horror); The point is that back then in the 50's and 60's England had a vast array of points of view to choose from in largely independant newspapers. Pretty free & democratic, I think.
I always had the impression that most US newspapers and TV were pretty conservative -- NYTimes, Wall Street Journal, Herald Tribune. the Randolph Hearst chain
I was amazed, therefore, when CNN was starting up that it had as its premise that the existing media were all left wing and that THEY were the ones who were going to be objective!! Yeah right!
As I see it, the problem with all media is the concentration of ownership in fewer and fewer corporate hands world-wide. This is far more of a problem in Canada than in the US but it still boils down to the same thing -- he who pays the piper calls the tune, and whether individual journalists will admit it or not they all, eventually, tailor their stories to what they think the editorial policies will tolerate. For the gentle, critical reader it is difficult to read between the lines of most stories in the NYT because it purports to be "objective". But when Corporate leaders suggest NYT is left wing, I would submit that is simply because it is not parrotting the corporate agenda as they think it is supposed to. From my position as an outsider, I still see the NYT as slightly to the right of centre -- but then, in today's world, I see most Republicans as extreme right wing and Democrats as right wing. Looking at the US in a global context, I see the US since 9/11 as extremely reactionary and imperialistic -- almost fascistic (& Mel Sembler et al are indicative of this) The media, by and large as tends to foster this. When I see Pat Buchanan on the "socialist" PBS (as CNN supporters like to view it) it makes me want to puke. While I can read the book, I certainly do not see NYT as having any sort of "leftist" agenda. Just that the fulcrum has moved way over to the right.
"Zero tolerance" and the sort of treatment for Adolescents that are the focus of this site are indicative of how far right N. American Society has gone.