stack is a curious fellow he blusters, he threatens, he is foul in word and i'm sure foul in deed. is he schizophrenic, no i don't think so. schizophrenics are without 'affect', ie; often emotionless, and stack doesn't seem that way. is he psychotic? it would seem so, from the fantasies he presents. is he dangerous, yes, i think so. i think so because a psychotic must render ever more effort to sustain the 'new reality' the one they've created. a psychotic is in fact a coward and cowardice knows no bounds. it will protect the fantasy at any cost. Morality and ethics fly away. he also exhibits 'flights of fancy' and an unending bent toward self-agrandizement. again. characteristic of the psychotic. he also exhibits a homosexual proclivity, which is often accompanied by rage. the rage/shame complex of emotions is, indeed what may be the defining criteria of homosexuality in general. think of the frequent reference to abuse in his letters. Normal men do not think or speak or feel this way. women know that, and stack knows that women know that. what troubles me so much about stack (and others like him) is that he has chosen this venue to serve his own sick fantasy and victimize others. it somehow serves stack to drive others away in disgust. it makes him feel powerful/potent. for one , i've had it up with foul language,and threats. i had enough of that in the seed. that's not how sane people behave, and if people want to act like that then, drive 'em from your midst. I perceive stack as no more and no less than a rabid animal. it's tragic, and i'd just as soon not, but sometimes you have to put 'em down. if it comes to it, i will. to the guest who asked what happened. well soon, i'll answer, for me, it's kind of a hard story.
stack: I'm not a very nice man, i can and i will
