MR. BEAR, DID YOU FIND ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS BROUGHT AGAINST ME OR TYING ME TO MR. MILLER?
I am getting confused on this deal who is speaking. And what the hell is all this jargon, like what is a thread, screed on so on? One so called guest (another phantom) said I was not opposed to this waserman dude and that I founded a program based on Straight. The Program I founded was based on a model that Yitzhak Bakal of North Eastern Family institute started in Boston (Yitzhak lives in Marblehead Mass) give him a call the program was called Proctor after a program also in Mass in New Bedford Mass. A lot of the programming came from a friend and professor of mine at Colombia University who wrote a book on positive norms, his name was Howard Polsky. Now you can all call Yitzhak and see if I am the terrible monster that the "guest" or whoever the hell is speaking. Howard passed away but I don't have any idea what the hell Straight does other than what I have seen on the news. And I am not part of a fraternity of nefarious evil lockup providers like this Wassman or Steinberg or who ever the hell you are associating me with. It is a lot like a Hitler stigmitization type of deal. This Meacham is one of them and therefore he should not pass go he should go straight to Aushwitz (sp) without first giving him due process. Kind of an Oxbow incident type of deal.
Ursus you and the gang are all talking about your 14th amendment rights to due process before your liberty interests are taken, and yet you stigmatize and black ball me with no evidence whatsoever. You are doing the exact same thing your parents or who ever had custody of you did. Take away your liberty without due process. What due process have you given me Ursus before you libeled me. You still have not offered any evidence e.g., case #-s or whatever to prove that I have ever been sued for abuse. Psy said that you are a solid researcher and he believes you have integrity and I guess would not try to take anyones dignity without the evidence. But you have not listed any cases or other citations regarding this or that I am good buds with this Newton dude. Give me his damn number and I will call him and have him sign an affidavit that we have never met!
It was my understanding that Newton started Kids, not Straight. What-s up with that. I believe that you all have a point about due process before they lock you up, but you never want to offer it to anyone else, before you stigmatize someone. In federal case law that is known as the stigma plus doctrine, but it has to be a state employee acting under the color of state law.
Now if it is come clean time hear from now on lets all admit where we were punished and what the charges were. Psy stated his charge was for political reasons and sexual preferences and Ursus you have not revealed your reasons for institutionalization. You all always say look it up. Where how? What the hell why not just tell us.
Well so much for this site it appears that your detractors like this PURE deal (what a bogus handle that is) and others may have a point that you are just loose cannons making allegations about people that cannot be substantiated. Your'e all just way pissed off about having to endure your PTSD from being denied due process. Hell I have PTSD from Khe Sahn Vietnam, but I don't go around beating up Vietnamese dudes. In fact I love Pho Hoa.
Now then Ursus I have a proposal for you and your followers. Why don't you and I find a radio or television network that we can debate on and record. You can publicly slander me or whatever and I will argue that some sort of programming may be indicated for kids who are blasted to the gills every day on Meth and who are into other types of serious distructive behavior. These will be non straight non Benchmark, CADU, or any of the places you were put in. Will you accept the challenge, how can you turn it down. We can cover the whole spectrum of deinstitutionalization. By the way Psy the C.S. Lewis quote is not applicable as it refers to treatment of SPMI clients (Seriously and Persistently Mentally Ill). I believe Kant's argument on rights is more fitting. Check out Kant on Wikipedia, he argues its ok to bring your kid back physically if he runs away. Ursus wouldn't you stop your four year old from zooming out into the freeway on his hotwheels or would you first demand some procedural and substantive due process before you physically restrained him from colliding with a semi.
MR. BEAR (WYATT) WHERES THE EVIDENCE
Anyhow, lets get a national forum going on this you take the side of radical non intervention regardliess of what the kid does and the PUREE folks can take the Charter or Benchmark Behavior Health lock up approach and I will take the antithesis and you and me and the pure girl can all go on Keith Oberman or a local radio station. Then you can really lay the wood to me with all the language and jargon I have seen on this site. Call Yitzhak first and see if he thinks I am for locking up kids or brutilizing kids. He was Miller's deputy in the late 70's when Miller closed all the reform schools in Mass. While the legislature was out of session.
Can you get me the case numbers tonight or by tomorrow morning. Surely you are not relying on the newpaper, sometimes the newspapers have tended to distort the truth from time to time.
Carry on dude,(an old Neal Cassity saying to Kerouac, only without the Dude)
Oh and the same disclaimer applies about my ADD no gaurantees about spelling or grammer as there is no evidence to support the notion that intelligence and spelling have any relationship (Dr. John Atzet Ph.D., M.D)
Dubuffet [/b](formerly the Anti Defamation Association)