- How, exactly, did "Well Proxied" know exactly how to access the personel files on CALO's server?
- If it was an inside job, who did it and what would be the motivation? It's fairly predictable that the files would be published.
- Consider that "well proxied" left no way to contact him/her and it seems as if he/she had no intention of ever editing the posts. If that's the case, the motivation for his/her actions would seem to be to lure CALO into legal action. What for? Who stands to benefit?
What if -- what if "well proxied" is not a "survivor", not a member of fornits, and indeed, not on the "anti-program" side at all. What if his/her actions were that of somebody seeking to see either fornits, CALO, or both out of the picture. What could be the motivation for such an action? Since we can safely assume this was at least a partial inside job, one has to ask why somebody would do it. If it was out of care for the kids with full knowledge the information contained within the treatment profiles were fictional, why ensure they get out into public? That doesn't sound like the action of somebody who truly cares about the wellbeing of the kids.
What if the employee did something bad -- really bad, was fired for it, and decided to portray his/herself as some sort of a "whistleblower" before word of what he/she did spread? If the "whistleblower" label sticks, any accusations come off as revenge and are automatically discarded as desperate attacks on the charachter. What if the "whistleblower" isn't really altruistic at all. Is it possible? Isn't it possible that one of the staff members let go could very well be a bona-fide child abuser trying to get away with what he/she did? If that's the case, is it possible some of the allegations made against CALO are untrue or at the very least exaggerated? Is it possible that sometimes "program-fighters" have had ulterior motives? Consider Sue Scheff.
