A few notes on privacy:
This is not medical information or psychiatric, as CALO is neither of those institutions. This is not intended to expose anything about the kids in question, as these documents do not contain much factual information at all. They are false, and the "No serious incidents" is the biggest and most obvious lie. Any future employer, or private investigator, or whoever is taking notes: Those PDFs contain practically nothing but control-fetishistic make-believe, with diagnoses issued by people who have no business giving them.
One would think that this should be passing-obvious to anyone who reads this board.
The only factual information on those documents is their names and faces. I have unfortunate news for some of you: posting names and faces of people, even children, is not illegal. Similarly the source of information, (and I am loath to give this away, as it breaks some of the super-hacker mystique associated with using proxies), is in fact available to the public, and not protected in any way. CALO has left these documents to be read by anyone who pleases and knows where to look. No hacking or insider information required.
Posting these documents is the equivalent of an Amber Alert, which activates when young children are captured by pedophiles. This system is more limited, and only activates when parents send their children to pedophiles. This is all those documents mean: that the thirty-two children in question are in the custody of people who should not be allowed near children.
(But I'm going to leave Tom's up anyway. If he is apprehended it should go to his defense attorney, assuming he gets one.)
I cannot say what Psy or Ginger may do or what the courts may order them to do, but for me I will ignore all parent/guardian requests for removal as they are clearly not fit to be parents/guardians. The only conditions under which I will voluntarily remove the names and faces are if the victim in question requests that I do so, while not being coerced. Which, in this case, means not in the program or under threat of being sent back. Otherwise, they stay up, to be conveniently re-downloaded by anyone who wants a copy.
(I obviously can't control what the downloaders may do, but I would like to remind them again that the information CALO has issued relating to these three children is so completely false and defamatory that attempts to misuse it against the victims in question is strongly frowned upon by both the legal system and civil society, and may constitute fraud.)
